World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6762
World Ranking
10170
National Ranking
308

Burak Turhan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burak Turhan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 210 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Burak Turhan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burak Turhan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Burak Turhan is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia, specializing in the field of Computer Science. Their work concentrates primarily on software engineering and related subfields, with a particular focus on software engineering research, techniques, and practices.

The subfields of study that Burak Turhan engages with include:

  • Information Systems
  • Software
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Safety Research
  • Health Informatics

Key topics that their research covers are:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Burak Turhan has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn
  • Rashina Hoda
  • Natália Juristo
  • Vladimir Mandić
  • Paul Ralph

Their recent papers demonstrate contributions to both software engineering practices and ethical considerations related to artificial intelligence. Among the publications are:

  • "Pandemic Programming," 2020, Empirical Software Engineering
  • "Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and Challenges," 2023, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • "On the need of preserving order of data when validating within-project defect classifiers," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Pandemic Programming: How COVID-19 affects software developers and how their organizations can help," 2020, PubMed

The venues where Burak Turhan has published regularly include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Burak Turhan was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2020.

Best Publications

  • On the relative value of cross-company and within-company data for defect prediction

    Burak Turhan;Tim Menzies;Ayşe B. Bener;Justin Di Stefano

  • Defect prediction from static code features: current results, limitations, new approaches

    Tim Menzies;Zach Milton;Burak Turhan;Bojan Cukic

  • A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Cross Project Defect Prediction

    Seyedrebvar Hosseini;Burak Turhan;Dimuthu Gunarathna

  • Local versus Global Lessons for Defect Prediction and Effort Estimation

    T. Menzies;A. Butcher;D. Cok;A. Marcus

  • Pandemic programming: How COVID-19 affects software developers and how their organizations can help.

    Paul Ralph;Sebastian Baltes;Gianisa Adisaputri;Richard Torkar;Richard Torkar

  • Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments

    Davide Falessi;Natalia Juristo;Claes Wohlin;Burak Turhan

  • Implications of ceiling effects in defect predictors

    Tim Menzies;Burak Turhan;Ayse Bener

  • Analysis of Naive Bayes' assumptions on software fault data: An empirical study

    Burak Turhan;Ayse Bener

  • On the dataset shift problem in software engineering prediction models

    Burak Turhan

  • Empirical evaluation of the effects of mixed project data on learning defect predictors

    Burak Turhan;Ayşe Tosun Mısırlı;Ayşe Bener

  • Cognitive Biases in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study

    Rahul Mohanani;Iflaah Salman;Burak Turhan;Pilar Rodriguez

  • A benchmark study on the effectiveness of search-based data selection and feature selection for cross project defect prediction

    Seyedrebvar Hosseini;Burak Turhan;Mika Mäntylä

  • A Dissection of the Test-Driven Development Process: Does It Really Matter to Test-First or to Test-Last?

    Davide Fucci;Hakan Erdogmus;Burak Turhan;Markku Oivo

  • Software effort estimation using machine learning methods

    B. Baskeles;B. Turhan;A. Bener

  • Validation of network measures as indicators of defective modules in software systems

    Ayşe Tosun;Burak Turhan;Ayşe Bener

  • What Do We Know about Test-Driven Development?

    F Shull;G Melnik;B Turhan;L Layman

  • Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research

    Paul Ralph;Nauman bin Ali;Sebastian Baltes;Domenico Bianculli

  • Practical considerations in deploying statistical methods for defect prediction: A case study within the Turkish telecommunications industry

    Ayşe Tosun;Ayşe Bener;Burak Turhan;Tim Menzies

  • An industrial case study of classifier ensembles for locating software defects

    Ayşe Tosun Mısırlı;Ayşe Başar Bener;Burak Turhan

  • Data mining source code for locating software bugs

    Burak Turhan;Gozde Kocak;Ayse Bener

  • Ensemble of neural networks with associative memory (ENNA) for estimating software development costs

    Yigit Kultur;Burak Turhan;Ayse Bener

Frequent Co-Authors

Ayse Bener
Ayse Bener Toronto Metropolitan University
Natalia Juristo
Natalia Juristo Technical University of Madrid
Tim Menzies
Tim Menzies North Carolina State University
Leandro L. Minku
Leandro L. Minku University of Birmingham
Giuseppe Scanniello
Giuseppe Scanniello University of Salerno
Markku Oivo
Markku Oivo University of Oulu
Emilia Mendes
Emilia Mendes Aarhus University
Massimiliano Di Penta
Massimiliano Di Penta University of Sannio
Robert Feldt
Robert Feldt Chalmers University of Technology
Jon Whittle
Jon Whittle Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science opens the door to many related online programs and careers in the USA. If you're interested in data-driven roles, a data scientist degree is a popular path, now widely available through affordable online universities. These programs equip you with the skills needed for roles in analytics, AI, and machine learning.

For those who prefer a blend of computer science and engineering, there are several accredited online electrical engineering programs. These degrees prepare graduates for careers in emerging fields like robotics, telecommunications, and hardware design, often offering flexible study options.

Not all careers require a lengthy degree. Many professionals are boosting their employability with certifications that pay well in areas like cybersecurity, network management, or cloud computing—credentials that can lead to quick job entry or advancement.

Finally, if speed matters, you can explore the shortest online masters degree options available in technology and engineering. These programs help you advance your education and career in as little as 12 months, making them ideal for motivated students who want to accelerate their progress.

Best Scientists Citing Burak Turhan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles