World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
7415
World Ranking
3434
National Ranking
862

Martin O Bohn publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin O Bohn sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 97 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Martin O Bohn D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin O Bohn sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Statistics

His main research concerns Genetics, Genetic diversity, Germplasm, Genetic marker and Allele. Martin O. Bohn regularly links together related areas like Tassel in his Genetics studies. His Genetic diversity research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Microsatellite and Cultivar.

Martin O. Bohn has researched Germplasm in several fields, including Genetic distance, Biotechnology, Hybrid and Plant breeding. His Plant breeding study is concerned with the larger field of Agronomy. His studies deal with areas such as Locus and Backcrossing as well as Genome.

His most cited work include:

  • Adaptation and invasiveness of western corn rootworm: intensifying research on a worsening pest. (331 citations)
  • Adaptation and invasiveness of western corn rootworm: intensifying research on a worsening pest. (331 citations)
  • Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding (291 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Martin O. Bohn mostly deals with Agronomy, Germplasm, Genetics, Quantitative trait locus and Hybrid. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including PEST analysis, European corn borer and Ostrinia. His PEST analysis research focuses on Pest control and how it relates to Diabrotica.

His Germplasm study incorporates themes from Biotechnology, Poaceae, Doubled haploidy and Genetic diversity. His Quantitative trait locus research incorporates elements of Southwestern corn borer, Diatraea saccharalis, Botany and Candidate gene. In general Hybrid study, his work on Heterosis often relates to the realm of Genetically modified maize, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (41.05%)
  • Germplasm (29.47%)
  • Genetics (25.26%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Germplasm (29.47%)
  • Agronomy (41.05%)
  • Gene–environment interaction (5.26%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Germplasm, Agronomy, Gene–environment interaction, Quantitative trait locus and Food science are his primary areas of study. His study in Germplasm is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Gibberellin, Biotechnology, Crop and Plant breeding. His study involves Western corn rootworm and Hybrid, a branch of Agronomy.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Environmental data and Phenology in addition to Gene–environment interaction. His study in the field of Doubled haploidy also crosses realms of Linear model, Diversity and Spurious relationship. His study on Food products is often connected to Product processing, Phenolic acid and Bioavailability as part of broader study in Food science.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Association Mapping of Flowering and Height Traits in Germplasm Enhancement of Maize Doubled Haploid (GEM-DH) Lines (17 citations)
  • Maize Genomes to Fields: 2014 and 2015 field season genotype, phenotype, environment, and inbred ear image datasets (16 citations)
  • Changes in Phenolic Acid Content in Maize during Food Product Processing. (11 citations)

Best Publications

  • Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding

    J C Reif;P Zhang;S Dreisigacker;M L Warburton

  • Adaptation and invasiveness of western corn rootworm: intensifying research on a worsening pest.

    Michael E. Gray;Thomas W. Sappington;Nicholas J. Miller;Joachim Moeser

  • Genetic Similarities among Winter Wheat Cultivars Determined on the Basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and Their Use for Predicting Progeny Variance

    Martin Bohn;H. Friedrich Utz;Albrecht E. Melchinger

  • Comparison of selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing of a gene

    Matthias Frisch;Martin Bohn;Albrecht E. Melchinger

  • Genetic distance based on simple sequence Repeats and Heterosis in Tropical Maize Populations

    J. C. Reif;A. E. Melchinger;X. C. Xia;M. L. Warburton

  • Genetic Characterization of CIMMYT Inbred Maize Lines and Open Pollinated Populations Using Large Scale Fingerprinting Methods

    Marilyn L. Warburton;Xia Xianchun;Jose Crossa;Jorge Franco

  • SSR and Pedigree Analyses of Genetic Diversity among CIMMYT Wheat Lines Targeted to Different Megaenvironments

    S. Dreisigacker;P. Zhang;M.L. Warburton;M. Van Ginkel

  • Minimum Sample Size and Optimal Positioning of Flanking Markers in Marker-Assisted Backcrossing for Transfer of a Target Gene

    Matthias Frisch;Martin Bohn;Albrecht A. Melchinger

  • Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize

    J.C. Reif;A.E. Melchinger;X.C. Xia;M.L. Warburton

  • Genetic Diversity in CIMMYT Nontemperate Maize Germplasm: Landraces, Open Pollinated Varieties, and Inbred Lines

    M.L. Warburton;J.C. Reif;M. Frisch;M. Bohn

  • Genetic and QTL analysis of maize tassel and ear inflorescence architecture

    N. Upadyayula;H. S. Da Silva;Martin O Bohn;T. R. Rocheford

  • Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data

    Martin Heckenberger;Martin O Bohn;Janet S. Ziegle;Larry K. Joe

  • Trends in genetic diversity among European maize cultivars and their parental components during the past 50 years

    Jochen C. Reif;Sonia Hamrit;Martin Heckenberger;Wolfgang Schipprack

  • Grouping of accessions of Mexican races of maize revisited with SSR markers

    J. C. Reif;M. L. Warburton;X. C. Xia;D. A. Hoisington

  • The effect of artificial selection on phenotypic plasticity in maize.

    Joseph L. Gage;Diego Jarquin;Cinta Romay;Aaron Lorenz

  • Genetic structure and diversity of European flint maize populations determined with SSR analyses of individuals and bulks

    Jochen C. Reif;Sonia Hamrit;Martin Heckenberger;Wolfgang Schipprack

  • QTL Mapping in Tropical Maize: I. Genomic Regions Affecting Leaf Feeding Resistance to Sugarcane Borer and Other Traits

    M. Bohn;M. M. Khairallah;D. González-de-León;D. A. Hoisington

  • Genetic Diversity Determined within and among CIMMYT Maize Populations of Tropical, Subtropical, and Temperate Germplasm by SSR Markers

    J.C. Reif;X.C. Xia;A.E. Melchinger;M.L. Warburton

  • Genomic Prediction of Single Crosses in the Early Stages of a Maize Hybrid Breeding Pipeline

    Dnyaneshwar C. Kadam;Sarah M. Potts;Martin O. Bohn;Alexander E. Lipka

  • QTL for Fatty Acid Composition of Maize Kernel Oil in Illinois High Oil × B73 Backcross-Derived Lines

    James J. Wassom;Venugopal Mikkelineni;Martin O. Bohn;Torbert R. Rocheford

  • Molecular mapping of QTL for southwestern corn borer resistance, plant height and flowering in tropical maize

    M. M. Khairallah;M. Bohn;C. Jiang;J. A. Deutsch

  • QTL Mapping in Tropical Maize: III. Genomic Regions for Resistance to Diatraea spp. and Associated Traits in Two RIL Populations

    S. Groh;D. González-de-León;M. M. Khairallah;C. Jiang

  • QTL Associated with Maize Kernel Oil, Protein, and Starch Concentrations; Kernel Mass; and Grain Yield in Illinois High Oil × B73 Backcross-Derived Lines

    James J. Wassom;Jeffrey C. Wong;Edwin Martinez;Joseph J. King

  • QTL Mapping in Tropical Maize: II. Comparison of Genomic Regions for Resistance to Diatraea spp.

    Martin O Bohn;M. M. Khairallah;C. Jiang;D. González-de-León

  • Adaptation and Invasiveness of Western Corn Rootworm: Intensifying Research

    Michael E. Gray;Thomas W. Sappington;Nicholas J. Miller;Joachim Moeser

Frequent Co-Authors

Albrecht E. Melchinger
Albrecht E. Melchinger University of Hohenheim
Sherry Flint-Garcia
Sherry Flint-Garcia United States Department of Agriculture
Matthias Frisch
Matthias Frisch University of Giessen
Torbert R. Rocheford
Torbert R. Rocheford Purdue University West Lafayette
David Hoisington
David Hoisington University of Georgia
Aaron J. Lorenz
Aaron J. Lorenz University of Minnesota
Marilyn L. Warburton
Marilyn L. Warburton United States Department of Agriculture
James B. Holland
James B. Holland North Carolina State University
Jochen C. Reif
Jochen C. Reif Leibniz Association
Edward S. Buckler
Edward S. Buckler Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin O Bohn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles