World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 31 6133 5739 259 254 61 4526

Claire Damesin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claire Damesin between 1994 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claire Damesin published across 30 years, from 1994 to 2023, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2019. 1 of the 67 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2019. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1994 2023

67 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claire Damesin: publications per year, 1994 to 2023
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 0
2005 4
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 4
2011 3
2012 2
2013 3
2014 0
2015 3
2016 3
2017 2
2018 1
2019 6
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 1
Total 67
Download as CSV

Claire Damesin publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire Damesin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–65 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 61 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107 61
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Claire Damesin D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire Damesin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236 31
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Photosynthesis

Her primary scientific interests are in Botany, Beech, Deciduous, Evergreen and Fagus sylvatica. She is involved in the study of Botany that focuses on Fagaceae in particular. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil water, Ecosystem, Carbon cycle and Respiration.

Her Soil respiration study, which is part of a larger body of work in Respiration, is frequently linked to Atmospheric sciences, bridging the gap between disciplines. Her work investigates the relationship between Deciduous and topics such as Horticulture that intersect with problems in Quercus petraea, Phenology and Scots pine. As part of her studies on Fagus sylvatica, she often connects relevant areas like Temperate forest.

Her most cited work include:

  • The carbon balance of a young Beech forest (258 citations)
  • Mixotrophy in orchids: insights from a comparative study of green individuals and nonphotosynthetic individuals of Cephalanthera damasonium (210 citations)
  • Comparing the intra-annual wood formation of three European species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris) as related to leaf phenology and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics. (191 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of investigation include Botany, Ecology, Fagus sylvatica, Beech and Quercus petraea. Her work carried out in the field of Botany brings together such families of science as δ13C, Carbon dioxide and Horticulture. In her research, Q10 is intimately related to Crown, which falls under the overarching field of Fagus sylvatica.

The various areas that Claire Damesin examines in her Beech study include Biomass, Canopy, Growing season and Respiration. Her Quercus petraea research integrates issues from Temperate forest, Eddy covariance and Phenology. While the research belongs to areas of Deciduous, she spends her time largely on the problem of Evergreen, intersecting her research to questions surrounding Fagaceae.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (72.60%)
  • Ecology (49.32%)
  • Fagus sylvatica (65.75%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Ecology (49.32%)
  • Fagus sylvatica (65.75%)
  • Growing season (54.79%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Claire Damesin mostly deals with Ecology, Fagus sylvatica, Growing season, Agronomy and Beech. Her study in the fields of Ecosystem and Temperate climate under the domain of Ecology overlaps with other disciplines such as Vascular transport, Nitrogen deficiency and Context. Fagus sylvatica is closely attributed to Quercus petraea in her study.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Biomass, Phloem and Xylem in addition to Growing season. Her research brings together the fields of Soil horizon and Beech. Her work deals with themes such as δ18O, δ13C and Horticulture, which intersect with Botany.

Between 2015 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Reduced stem growth, but no reserve depletion or hydraulic impairment in beech suffering from long-term decline (13 citations)
  • Reduced stem growth, but no reserve depletion or hydraulic impairment in beech suffering from long-term decline (13 citations)
  • Reduced stem growth, but no reserve depletion or hydraulic impairment in beech suffering from long-term decline (13 citations)

Best Publications

  • The carbon balance of a young Beech forest

    A. Granier;E. Ceschia;C. Damesin;E. Dufrêne

  • Comparing the intra-annual wood formation of three European species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris) as related to leaf phenology and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics.

    Alice Michelot;Sonia Simard;Cyrille Rathgeber;Eric Dufrêne;Eric Dufrêne;Eric Dufrêne

  • Mixotrophy in orchids: insights from a comparative study of green individuals and nonphotosynthetic individuals of Cephalanthera damasonium

    Thomas Julou;Bastian Burghardt;Gerhard Gebauer;Daniel Berveiller

  • Carbon isotope composition of current‐year shoots from Fagus sylvatica in relation to growth, respiration and use of reserves

    C. Damesin;C. Lelarge

  • Stem and branch respiration of beech: from tree measurements to estimations at the stand level

    C. Damesin;E. Ceschia;N. Le Goff;J-M. Ottorini

  • Differing growth responses to climatic variations and soil water deficits of Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris in a temperate forest

    Alice Michelot;Alice Michelot;Nathalie Bréda;Claire Damesin;Claire Damesin;Eric Dufrêne;Eric Dufrêne

  • The AMMA-CATCH Gourma observatory site in Mali: Relating climatic variations to changes in vegetation, surface hydrology, fluxes and natural resources

    E. Mougin;P. Hiernaux;L. Kergoat;M. Grippa

  • Respiration and photosynthesis characteristics of current‐year stems of Fagus sylvatica: from the seasonal pattern to an annual balance

    C. Damesin

  • Between-tree variations in leaf δ13C of Quercus pubescens and Quercus ilex among Mediterranean habitats with different water availability.

    C. Damesin;S. Rambal;R. Joffre

  • Seasonal and annual changes in leaf δ13C in two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks: relations to leaf growth and drought progression

    C. Damesin;S. Rambal;R. Joffre

  • Co-occurrence of trees with different leaf habit: A functional approach on Mediterranean oaks

    Claire Damesin;Serge Rambal;Richard Joffre

  • Growth duration is a better predictor of stem increment than carbon supply in a Mediterranean oak forest: implications for assessing forest productivity under climate change.

    Morine Lempereur;Nicolas K. Martin‐StPaul;Claire Damesin;Richard Joffre

  • Spatial and seasonal variations in stem respiration of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica)

    Éric Ceschia;Claire Damesin;Stéphanie Lebaube;Jean-Yves Pontailler

  • Interspecific variability of stem photosynthesis among tree species.

    Daniel Berveiller;Daniel Kierzkowski;Claire Damesin

  • Why do mixotrophic plants stay green? A comparison between green and achlorophyllous orchid individuals in situ

    M. Roy;C. Gonneau;Alain Rocheteau;Alain Rocheteau;D. Berveiller;D. Berveiller

  • In situ assessment of the velocity of carbon transfer by tracing 13C in trunk CO2 efflux after pulse labelling: variations among tree species and seasons

    Masako Dannoura;Masako Dannoura;Pascale Maillard;Pascale Maillard;Chantal Fresneau;Chantal Fresneau;Chantal Fresneau;Caroline Plain;Caroline Plain

  • Increase in aboveground fresh litter quantity over-stimulates soil respiration in a temperate deciduous forest

    Nicolas Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré;Nicolas Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré;Kamel Soudani;Claire Damesin;Daniel Berveiller

  • Functional Attributes in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems

    Richard Joffre;Serge Rambal;Claire Damesin

  • Carbon assimilation by tree stems: potential involvement of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase

    Daniel Berveiller;Claire Damesin

  • Seasonal dynamics of the bacterial community in forest soils under different quantities of leaf litter

    Nicolas Chemidlin Prevost-Boure;Nicolas Chemidlin Prevost-Boure;Pierre-Alain Maron;Lionel Ranjard;Virginie Nowak

  • Drought and photosystem II activity in two Mediterranean oaks

    M Méthy;C Damesin;S Rambal

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Dufrêne
Eric Dufrêne University of Paris-Saclay
Serge Rambal
Serge Rambal Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Daniel Epron
Daniel Epron Kyoto University
Richard Joffre
Richard Joffre Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Nicolas Delpierre
Nicolas Delpierre University of Paris-Saclay
Marc-André Selosse
Marc-André Selosse University of Gdańsk
Eric Mougin
Eric Mougin Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Eric Ceschia
Eric Ceschia Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Laurent Kergoat
Laurent Kergoat Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Heikki Hänninen
Heikki Hänninen Zhejiang A & F University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Claire Damesin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles