World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
12872
World Ranking
6350
National Ranking
42

Robert Feldt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Feldt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert Feldt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Feldt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Feldt is affiliated with Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with substantial contributions in Information Systems, Software, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Health Informatics.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis

Robert Feldt has a number of frequent co-authors collaborating on multiple projects. These include:

  • Shin Yoo
  • Kristian Samuelsson
  • Daniel Graziotin
  • Bálint Zsidai
  • Per Lenberg

The scientist's publications are frequently found in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communities (2020), published in Artificial Life
  • Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information (2023), Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
  • Why many challenges with GUI test automation (will) remain (2021), Information and Software Technology
  • Similarity-based Web Element Localization for Robust Test Automation (2022), ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Best Publications

  • Systematic mapping studies in software engineering

    Kai Petersen;Robert Feldt;Shahid Mujtaba;Michael Mattsson

  • A systematic review of search-based testing for non-functional system properties

    Wasif Afzal;Richard Torkar;Robert Feldt

  • Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review

    Darja Šmite;Claes Wohlin;Tony Gorschek;Robert Feldt

  • Guiding deep learning system testing using surprise adequacy

    Jinhan Kim;Robert Feldt;Shin Yoo

  • Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review

    M. Unterkalmsteiner;T. Gorschek;A. K. M. M. Islam;Chow Kian Cheng

  • Validity threats in empirical software engineering research - An initial survey

    Robert Feldt;Ana Magazinius

  • Behavioral software engineering

    Per Lenberg;Robert Feldt;Lars Göran Wallgren

  • The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communities

    Joel Lehman;Jeff Clune;Dusan Misevic;Christoph Adami

  • A systematic review on strategic release planning models

    Mikael Svahnberg;Tony Gorschek;Robert Feldt;Richard Torkar

  • The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communities

    Joel Lehman;Jeff Clune;Dusan Misevic;Christoph Adami

  • Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers

    Robert Feldt;Lefteris Angelis;Richard Torkar;Maria Samuelsson

  • Challenges and practices in aligning requirements with verification and validation: a case study of six companies

    Elizabeth Bjarnason;Per Runeson;Markus Borg;Michael Unterkalmsteiner

  • Automated System Testing Using Visual GUI Testing Tools: A Comparative Study in Industry

    Emil Borjesson;Robert Feldt

  • Test Set Diameter: Quantifying the Diversity of Sets of Test Cases

    Robert Feldt;Simon Poulding;David Clark;Shin Yoo

  • Prioritization of quality requirements: State of practice in eleven companies

    Richard Berntsson Svensson;Tony Gorschek;Bjorn Regnell;Richard Torkar

  • Quality Requirements in Industrial Practice—An Extended Interview Study at Eleven Companies

    Richard Berntsson Svensson;T. Gorschek;B. Regnell;R. Torkar

  • Towards individualized software engineering: empirical studies should collect psychometrics

    Robert Feldt;Richard Torkar;Lefteris Angelis;Maria Samuelsson

  • REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND INDUSTRY CASE STUDY

    Richard Torkar;Tony Gorschek;Robert Feldt;Mikael Svahnberg

  • A systematic review of software robustness

    Ali Shahrokni;Robert Feldt

  • Personality, emotional intelligence and work preferences in software engineering: An empirical study

    Makrina Viola Kosti;Robert Feldt;Robert Feldt;Lefteris Angelis

  • Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies

    Lucas Gren;Richard Torkar;Robert Feldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Torkar
Richard Torkar University of Gothenburg
Tony Gorschek
Tony Gorschek Blekinge Institute of Technology
Shin Yoo
Shin Yoo Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Lefteris Angelis
Lefteris Angelis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Kai Petersen
Kai Petersen Blekinge Institute of Technology
Björn Regnell
Björn Regnell Lund University
Miroslaw Staron
Miroslaw Staron University of Gothenburg
Michael Felderer
Michael Felderer University of Cologne
Per Runeson
Per Runeson Lund University
David M. Clark
David M. Clark University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a wide range of career pathways. Many students also consider specialized areas or complementary degrees, which can be pursued flexibly through online programs. These options allow you to tailor your expertise to meet industry demand while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in the growing field of information security, earning a cyber security online degree can lead to high-demand roles protecting digital infrastructure for businesses and governments. Alternatively, if you are drawn to leadership roles in building and design, a construction management degree online offers skills in project oversight and technology integration.

Careers in law enforcement and legal technology are also evolving alongside advances in computer science. An criminal justice degree online accredited can prepare you for roles in digital forensics, cybercrime, or public service. Likewise, if you are interested in data and financial systems, an accounting degree can increase your versatility and open up roles in analytics, auditing, or information systems management.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Feldt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles