World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Björn Regnell

Björn Regnell

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
12711
World Ranking
7411
National Ranking
52

Björn Regnell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Regnell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Björn Regnell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Regnell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Björn Regnell is a researcher affiliated with Lund University in Sweden. Their work primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with focused contributions in the areas of Computer Science Applications, Communication, and Information Systems.

Their main research topics include:

  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Software Engineering Research

Björn Regnell has published in venues such as:

  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • IEEE Software

Notable recent publications include:

  • What to share, when, and where: balancing the objectives and complexities of open source software contributions (2020, Empirical Software Engineering)
  • The Magazine at 40: Viewing Requirements Engineering Through a Ruby Lens (2024, IEEE Software)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Johan Linåker
  • Kristian Sandahl
  • Markus Borg

Best Publications

  • Experimentation in Software Engineering

    Unknown

  • Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples

    Per Runeson;Martin Host;Austen Rainer;Bjorn Regnell

  • Using Students as Subjects—A Comparative Study ofStudents and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment

    Martin Höst;Björn Regnell;Claes Wohlin

  • Att genomföra examensarbete

    Martin Höst;Björn Regnell;Per Runeson

  • An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements

    Joachim Karlsson;Claes Wohlin;Björn Regnell

  • An industrial survey of requirements interdependencies in software product release planning

    P. Carlshamre;K. Sandahl;M. Lindvall;B. Regnell

  • An industrial case study on distributed prioritisation in market-driven requirements engineering for packaged software

    Björn Regnell;Martin Höst;Johan Natt och Dag;Per Beremark

  • Requirements engineering challenges in market-driven software development - An interview study with practitioners

    Lena Karlsson;sa G. Dahlstedt;Björn Regnell;Johan Natt och Dag

  • Market-Driven Requirements Engineering for Software Products

    Björn Regnell;Sjaak Brinkkemper

  • Is a design rationale vital when predicting change impact? A controlled experiment on software architecture evolution

    L. Bratthall;E. Johansson;B. Regnell

  • Improving the use case driven approach to requirements engineering

    B. Regnell;K. Kimbler;A. Wesslen

  • Requirements are slipping through the gaps — A case study on causes & effects of communication gaps in large-scale software development

    Elizabeth Bjarnason;Krzysztof Wnuk;Bjorn Regnell

  • A hierarchical use case model with graphical representation

    B. Regnell;M. Andersson;J. Bergstrand

  • Challenges in Market-Driven Requirements Engineering - an Industrial Interview Study

    Lena Karlsson;Åsa G. Dahlstedt;Johan Natt och Dag;Björn Regnell

  • A linguistic-engineering approach to large-scale requirements management

    J. Natt och Dag;B. Regnell;V. Gervasi;S. Brinkkemper

  • A case study on benefits and side-effects of agile practices in large-scale requirements engineering

    Elizabeth Bjarnason;Krzysztof Wnuk;Björn Regnell

  • Requirements lifecycle management and release planning in market-driven requirements engineering processes

    P. Carlshamre;B. Regnell

  • Are the Perspectives Really Different? – FurtherExperimentation on Scenario-Based Reading of Requirements

    Björn Regnell;Per Runeson;Thomas Thelin

  • Challenges and practices in aligning requirements with verification and validation: a case study of six companies

    Elizabeth Bjarnason;Per Runeson;Markus Borg;Michael Unterkalmsteiner

  • Pair-wise comparisons versus planning game partitioning--experiments on requirements prioritisation techniques

    Lena Karlsson;Thomas Thelin;Björn Regnell;Patrik Berander

  • A market-driven requirements engineering process: Results from an industrial process improvement programme

    Björn Regnell;Per Beremark;Ola Eklundh

  • Analysis and Interpretation

    Claes Wohlin;Per Runeson;Martin Höst;Magnus C. Ohlsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Runeson
Per Runeson Lund University
Martin Höst
Martin Höst Malmö University
Claes Wohlin
Claes Wohlin Blekinge Institute of Technology
Tony Gorschek
Tony Gorschek Blekinge Institute of Technology
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Sjaak Brinkkemper Utrecht University
Robert Feldt
Robert Feldt Chalmers University of Technology
Daniela Damian
Daniela Damian University of Victoria
Tommy Olsson
Tommy Olsson Umeå University
Aybüke Aurum
Aybüke Aurum University of New South Wales
Roel Wieringa
Roel Wieringa University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA offers many exciting options, including flexible online study. If you’re looking to start quickly, consider an online associates degree. These can be completed in as little as six months, helping you enter the tech workforce fast or serve as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s degree.

For those interested in broadening their skills, an affordable online business degree can complement technical expertise with valuable business acumen. Cost is an important factor, and students have access to some of the cheapest online bachelors degree options, making higher education more accessible and budget-friendly.

Finally, if your ambitions are more technical or specialized, pursuing an engineering degree online ensures you won’t miss out on in-demand career pathways while maintaining schedule flexibility. With so many options, aspiring computer science professionals can choose a path that best fits their career goals and financial situation.

Best Scientists Citing Björn Regnell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles