D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Engineering and Technology D-index 31 Citations 9,361 101 World Ranking 5816 National Ranking 68

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Software engineering
  • Software development
  • Software development process

Software engineering, Management science, Empirical process, Agile software development and Software development process are his primary areas of study. His Software engineering research incorporates themes from Test, Knowledge management and Reusability. His Management science research incorporates elements of Data science, Relation and Process.

His work in Empirical process tackles topics such as Lean software development which are related to areas like Lean project management, Process management, Personal software process and Software Engineering Process Group. His studies deal with areas such as Agile usability engineering, Global software and Agile Unified Process as well as Agile software development. His Software development process research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Test suite, Test case, Empirical research and Scope.

His most cited work include:

  • Systematic mapping studies in software engineering (1358 citations)
  • Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering : An update (721 citations)
  • Context in industrial software engineering research (205 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Kai Petersen mainly investigates Software engineering, Process management, Agile software development, Process and Management science. Kai Petersen undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Software engineering and Systematic mapping in his work. His Process management research includes elements of Agile practices, Software system and Knowledge management.

Kai Petersen combines subjects such as Software development, Empirical process, Agile usability engineering, Risk analysis and Agile Unified Process with his study of Agile software development. Borrowing concepts from Structure, Kai Petersen weaves in ideas under Process. The various areas that Kai Petersen examines in his Management science study include Relevance, Requirements engineering, Relation, Empirical research and Data science.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Software engineering (25.93%)
  • Process management (24.44%)
  • Agile software development (20.74%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Process management (24.44%)
  • Empirical research (17.04%)
  • Software engineering (25.93%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Process management, Empirical research, Software engineering, Checklist and Process. His Process management study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Agile practices, Key and Taxonomy. His Empirical research research integrates issues from Management science, Sampling, Software walkthrough, Software Engineering Process Group and Social software engineering.

As a part of the same scientific study, Kai Petersen usually deals with the Management science, concentrating on Relevance and frequently concerns with Industrial software and Engineering management. Among his Software engineering studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Systematic mapping and Evidence based decision making. His work in Process addresses subjects such as Software system, which are connected to disciplines such as Behavior-driven development, Software versioning and Component.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A systematic literature review of software requirements reuse approaches (31 citations)
  • Choosing Component Origins for Software Intensive Systems: In-House, COTS, OSS or Outsourcing?—A Case Survey (27 citations)
  • CERSE - Catalog for empirical research in software engineering: A Systematic mapping study (15 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Software engineering
  • Software development
  • Software development process

His scientific interests lie mostly in Empirical research, Process management, Software engineering, Management science and DevOps. His research integrates issues of Sampling, Personal software process, Software Engineering Process Group and Data science in his study of Empirical research. Kai Petersen has researched Process management in several fields, including Agile software development and Agile practices.

His studies in Software engineering integrate themes in fields like Checklist and Social software engineering. His work deals with themes such as Software requirements, Relevance, Process and Reusability, which intersect with Management science. His DevOps research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Key and Software development.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Systematic mapping studies in software engineering

Kai Petersen;Robert Feldt;Shahid Mujtaba;Michael Mattsson.
evaluation and assessment in software engineering (2008)

2911 Citations

Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering : An update

Kai Petersen;Sairam Vakkalanka;Ludwik Kuzniarz.
Information & Software Technology (2015)

1477 Citations

Context in industrial software engineering research

Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin.
empirical software engineering and measurement (2009)

292 Citations

Benefits and limitations of automated software testing: systematic literature review and practitioner survey

Dudekula Mohammad Rafi;Katam Reddy Kiran Moses;Kai Petersen;Mika V. Mantyla.
automation of software test (2012)

271 Citations

A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development between state of the art and an industrial case

Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin.
Journal of Systems and Software (2009)

271 Citations

What is DevOps?: A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices

Ramtin Jabbari;Nauman bin Ali;Kai Petersen;Binish Tanveer.
Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016 (2016)

226 Citations

The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices

Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin.
Empirical Software Engineering (2010)

207 Citations

The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development

Kai Petersen;Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin;Dejan Baca;Dejan Baca.
product focused software process improvement (2009)

200 Citations

Worldviews, Research Methods, and their Relationship to Validity in Empirical Software Engineering Research

Kai Petersen;Cigdem Gencel.
joint conference of international workshop on software measurement and international conference on software process and product measurement (2013)

163 Citations

Measuring the flow in lean software development

K. Petersen;C. Wohlin.
Software - Practice and Experience (2011)

155 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Kai Petersen

Mika V. Mäntylä

Mika V. Mäntylä

University of Oulu

Publications: 44

Robert Feldt

Robert Feldt

Chalmers University of Technology

Publications: 40

Natalia Juristo

Natalia Juristo

Technical University of Madrid

Publications: 36

Tony Gorschek

Tony Gorschek

Blekinge Institute of Technology

Publications: 32

Per Runeson

Per Runeson

Lund University

Publications: 27

Mario Piattini

Mario Piattini

University of Castilla-La Mancha

Publications: 25

Burak Turhan

Burak Turhan

University of Oulu

Publications: 24

Claes Wohlin

Claes Wohlin

Blekinge Institute of Technology

Publications: 24

Dietmar Pfahl

Dietmar Pfahl

University of Tartu

Publications: 23

Xavier Franch

Xavier Franch

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

Publications: 21

Pekka Abrahamsson

Pekka Abrahamsson

University of Jyväskylä

Publications: 18

Jürgen Münch

Jürgen Münch

Reutlingen University

Publications: 17

Ricardo Colomo-Palacios

Ricardo Colomo-Palacios

Østfold University College

Publications: 17

Emilia Mendes

Emilia Mendes

Blekinge Institute of Technology

Publications: 16

Muhammad Ali Babar

Muhammad Ali Babar

University of Adelaide

Publications: 16

Patricia Lago

Patricia Lago

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Publications: 15

Trending Scientists

Stefano Stramigioli

Stefano Stramigioli

University of Twente

Christophe Caucheteur

Christophe Caucheteur

University of Mons

Marco Buongiorno Nardelli

Marco Buongiorno Nardelli

University of North Texas

Hu Ding

Hu Ding

Shanghai University

Helmar Görls

Helmar Görls

Friedrich Schiller University Jena

Patrick Y. S. Lam

Patrick Y. S. Lam

Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany)

Yehoshoa Ben-David

Yehoshoa Ben-David

Weizmann Institute of Science

Masahiro Terada

Masahiro Terada

Tohoku University

Roger C. Newman

Roger C. Newman

University of Toronto

Jianquan Liu

Jianquan Liu

Sichuan University

Hakon Leffler

Hakon Leffler

Lund University

Ann M. Stock

Ann M. Stock

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Erik De Clercq

Erik De Clercq

KU Leuven

Michael J. Russell

Michael J. Russell

California Institute of Technology

Colin R. Thorne

Colin R. Thorne

University of Nottingham

Jacques Cadranel

Jacques Cadranel

Université Paris Cité

Something went wrong. Please try again later.