World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
68
Citations
36943
World Ranking
2022
National Ranking
7

Claes Wohlin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claes Wohlin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 269 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Claes Wohlin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claes Wohlin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Claes Wohlin is affiliated with the Blekinge Institute of Technology in Sweden and focuses their research in the field of computer science, particularly software engineering. They have contributed extensively to several subfields including information systems, artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, computer science applications, and software.

Their research topics encompass a broad range of subjects within software engineering and related domains. These include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management

Wohlin has published multiple papers, many appearing in the journal Information and Software Technology. Notable recent publications include:

  • Successful combination of database search and snowballing for identification of primary studies in systematic literature studies, 2022, Information and Software Technology
  • Guidelines for the search strategy to update systematic literature reviews in software engineering, 2020, Information and Software Technology
  • Case Study Research in Software Engineering-It is a Case, and it is a Study, but is it a Case Study?, 2021, Information and Software Technology
  • Guiding the selection of research methodology in industry-academia collaboration in software engineering, 2021, Information and Software Technology

Other frequent venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal

Their research collaborations often involve several scholars in the software engineering field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Austen Rainer
  • Marcos Kalinowski
  • Emília Mendes
  • Katia Romero Felizardo
  • Nauman bin Ali

Best Publications

  • Experimentation in Software Engineering

    Claes Wohlin;Per Runeson;Martin Hst;Magnus C. Ohlsson

  • Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering

    Claes Wohlin

  • Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction

    Claes Wohlin;Per Runeson;Martin Höst;Magnus C. Ohlsson

  • Experimentation in Software Engineering

    Unknown

  • Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing

    Samireh Jalali;Claes Wohlin

  • Using Students as Subjects—A Comparative Study ofStudents and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment

    Martin Höst;Björn Regnell;Claes Wohlin

  • An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements

    Joachim Karlsson;Claes Wohlin;Björn Regnell

  • Engineering and Managing Software Requirements

    Aybüke Aurum;Claes Wohlin

  • Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review

    Darja Šmite;Claes Wohlin;Tony Gorschek;Robert Feldt

  • A Model for Technology Transfer in Practice

    T. Gorschek;C. Wohlin;P. Carre;S. Larsson

  • Empirical research methods in software engineering

    Claes Wohlin;Martin Höst;Kennet Henningsson

  • Context in industrial software engineering research

    Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin

  • Successful combination of database search and snowballing for identification of primary studies in systematic literature studies

    Unknown

  • State-of-the-art: software inspections after 25 years

    Aybuke Aurum;Håkan Petersson;Claes Wohlin

  • A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development between state of the art and an industrial case

    Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin

  • The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development

    Kai Petersen;Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin;Dejan Baca;Dejan Baca

  • Requirements Abstraction Model

    Tony Gorschek;Claes Wohlin

  • The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices

    Kai Petersen;Claes Wohlin

  • Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments

    Davide Falessi;Natalia Juristo;Claes Wohlin;Burak Turhan

  • The fundamental nature of requirements engineering activities as a decision-making process

    Aybüke Aurum;Claes Wohlin

  • Towards a decision-making structure for selecting a research design in empirical software engineering

    Claes Wohlin;Aybüke Aurum

  • On the Reliability of Mapping Studies in Software Engineering

    Claes Wohlin;Per Runeson;Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto;Emelie Engström

  • Agile Practices in Global Software Engineering - A Systematic Map

    Samireh Jalali;Claes Wohlin

  • Analysis and Interpretation

    Claes Wohlin;Per Runeson;Martin Höst;Magnus C. Ohlsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Aybüke Aurum
Aybüke Aurum University of New South Wales
Per Runeson
Per Runeson Lund University
Martin Höst
Martin Höst Malmö University
Tony Gorschek
Tony Gorschek Blekinge Institute of Technology
Björn Regnell
Björn Regnell Lund University
Kai Petersen
Kai Petersen Blekinge Institute of Technology
Emilia Mendes
Emilia Mendes Aarhus University
Lefteris Angelis
Lefteris Angelis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Min Xie
Min Xie City University of Hong Kong
Miroslaw Staron
Miroslaw Staron University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA often opens doors to a wide variety of related online degrees and career pathways. If you’re considering how to expand your academic foundation or increase your job prospects, choosing one of the best majors for the future can be a strategic move. Fields related to Computer Science often rank highly, thanks to ongoing demand for tech-savvy professionals.

For those interested in advancing quickly, some students opt for the easiest online masters degree programs, which offer flexible study options and can be completed in less time. This is a practical route for busy professionals looking to upskill or shift careers.

If affordability is a concern, seeking out the cheapest doctorate degree online may make advanced study more accessible. These programs provide opportunities for specialization without a heavy financial burden.

Additionally, those interested in education leadership may consider online edd programs, which can offer accelerated, research-focused paths into administrative or academic roles.

Best Scientists Citing Claes Wohlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles