World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
8575
World Ranking
5942
National Ranking
40

Tony Gorschek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony Gorschek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 191 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tony Gorschek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony Gorschek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tony Gorschek is affiliated with the Blekinge Institute of Technology in Sweden, with a primary research focus in Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Information Systems, Software, Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research covers several main topics:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Software System Performance and Reliability

Tony Gorschek has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • Information and Software Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Requirements Engineering

Recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by them cover a range of topics in software development and engineering. Examples include:

  • Software Startups -- A Research Agenda (2023), published in Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)
  • The state-of-practice in requirements specification: an extended interview study at 12 companies (2023), published in Requirements Engineering
  • Towards cost-benefit evaluation for continuous software engineering activities (2022), published in Empirical Software Engineering
  • The perspective of Brazilian software developers on data privacy (2022), published in Journal of Systems and Software
  • The role of knowledge-based resources in Agile Software Development contexts (2022), published in Journal of Systems and Software

The scientist has also contributed to book publications such as Requirements Engineering for Safety-Critical Systems (2022), released by River Publishers eBooks.

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Daniel Méndez
  • Niklas Lavesson
  • Eriks Klotins
  • Krzysztof Wnuk
  • Emil Alégroth

Best Publications

  • Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

    Nicolò Paternoster;Carmine Giardino;Michael Unterkalmsteiner;Tony Gorschek

  • Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review

    Darja Šmite;Claes Wohlin;Tony Gorschek;Robert Feldt

  • A Model for Technology Transfer in Practice

    T. Gorschek;C. Wohlin;P. Carre;S. Larsson

  • Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review

    M. Unterkalmsteiner;T. Gorschek;A. K. M. M. Islam;Chow Kian Cheng

  • A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations

    Martin Ivarsson;Tony Gorschek

  • Requirements Abstraction Model

    Tony Gorschek;Claes Wohlin

  • Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

    Carmine Giardino;Nicolo Paternoster;Michael Unterkalmsteiner;Tony Gorschek

  • A systematic review on strategic release planning models

    Mikael Svahnberg;Tony Gorschek;Robert Feldt;Richard Torkar

  • What Do We Know about Software Development in Startups

    Carmine Giardino;Michael Unterkalmsteiner;Nicolo Paternoster;Tony Gorschek

  • The impact of agile principles on market‐driven software product development

    Nina Dzamashvili Fogelström;Tony Gorschek;Mikael Svahnberg;Peo Olsson

  • A practitioner's guide to light weight software process assessment and improvement planning

    F. Pettersson;M. Ivarsson;T. Gorschek;P. Öhman

  • The Success Factors Powering Industry-Academia Collaboration

    Claes Wohlin;A. Aurum;L. Angelis;L. Phillips

  • Software Startups - A Research Agenda

    Michael Unterkalmsteiner;Pekka Kalevi Abrahamsson;Xiaofeng Wang;Anh Nguyen-Duc

  • Challenges and practices in aligning requirements with verification and validation: a case study of six companies

    Elizabeth Bjarnason;Per Runeson;Markus Borg;Michael Unterkalmsteiner

  • The software value map — an exhaustive collection of value aspects for the development of software intensive products

    Mahvish Khurum;Tony Gorschek;Magnus Wilson

  • Software quality attributes and trade-offs

    Patrik Berander;Lars-Ola Damm;Jeanette Eriksson;Tony Gorschek

  • A study of value in agile software development organizations

    Hiva Alahyari;Richard Berntsson Svensson;Tony Gorschek

  • Prioritization of quality requirements: State of practice in eleven companies

    Richard Berntsson Svensson;Tony Gorschek;Bjorn Regnell;Richard Torkar

  • Requirements engineering: In search of the dependent variables

    Tony Gorschek;Alan M. Davis

  • Quality Requirements in Industrial Practice—An Extended Interview Study at Eleven Companies

    Richard Berntsson Svensson;T. Gorschek;B. Regnell;R. Torkar

  • Technology transfer decision support in requirements engineering research: a systematic review of REj

    Martin Ivarsson;Tony Gorschek

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Feldt
Robert Feldt Chalmers University of Technology
Claes Wohlin
Claes Wohlin Blekinge Institute of Technology
Richard Torkar
Richard Torkar University of Gothenburg
Björn Regnell
Björn Regnell Lund University
Kai Petersen
Kai Petersen Blekinge Institute of Technology
Lefteris Angelis
Lefteris Angelis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Pekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson Tampere University
Aybüke Aurum
Aybüke Aurum University of New South Wales
Rafael Prikladnicki
Rafael Prikladnicki Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Tommy Olsson
Tommy Olsson Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science opens up numerous possibilities, especially with today’s flexible online education options. Students seeking cost-effective routes to a CS degree can explore affordable online degree programs—making advanced education accessible without breaking the bank.

Academic requirements vary, and some potential students may be concerned about their previous grades. Fortunately, there are best colleges for low gpa that welcome driven learners with diverse academic backgrounds, providing a second chance to succeed in Computer Science.

Beyond programming and software development, Computer Science skills are valuable in interdisciplinary fields. For instance, they can enhance opportunities for those earning an environmental science degree, opening doors in data analytics, research, and technology-driven environmental solutions.

Many students also prefer a faster path to graduation. If speed is a priority, consider the computer science degree online options designed for rapid completion. These programs offer intensive coursework for quicker entry into the tech workforce and related career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Tony Gorschek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles