World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
101
Citations
40359
World Ranking
594
National Ranking
378

Neuroscience

D-Index
101
Citations
40445
World Ranking
731
National Ranking
410

Monique Ernst publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monique Ernst sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 349 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Monique Ernst D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monique Ernst sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Monique Ernst is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and focuses their research primarily on neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and public health, environmental and occupational health. The breadth of these fields reflects a multidisciplinary approach to understanding brain function and behavior.

Their published research includes 49 publications in neuroscience and 36 in psychology, with consistent contributions to multiple topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology, anxiety and depression psychometrics and treatment, eating disorders, memory and neural mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, and mental health research.

The following papers are notable within their recent contributions:

  • <scp>Mega-analysis</scp> methods in <scp>ENIGMA</scp>: The experience of the generalized anxiety disorder working group (2020, Human Brain Mapping)
  • Cortical and subcortical brain structure in generalized anxiety disorder: findings from 28 research sites in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group (2021, Translational Psychiatry)
  • A generalized workflow for conducting electric field-optimized, fMRI-guided, transcranial magnetic stimulation (2020, Nature Protocols)
  • A way forward for anxiolytic drug development: Testing candidate anxiolytics with anxiety-potentiated startle in healthy humans (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Low-frequency parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces fear and anxiety (2020, Translational Psychiatry)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Christian Grillon, Nicholas L. Balderston, Adam X. Gorka, and Daniel S. Pine.

Their research has been published prominently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry, and Psychopharmacology.

Best Publications

  • Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Bharat B. Biswal;Maarten Mennes;Xi Nian Zuo;Suril Gohel

  • Attention Bias Modification Treatment: A Meta-Analysis Toward the Establishment of Novel Treatment for Anxiety

    Yuko Hakamata;Shmuel Lissek;Yair Bar-Haim;Jennifer C. Britton

  • Triadic model of the neurobiology of motivated behavior in adolescence

    Monique Ernst;Daniel S. Pine;Michael Hardin

  • Amygdala and Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation to Masked Angry Faces in Children and Adolescents with Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Christopher S. Monk;Eva H. Telzer;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Amygdala and nucleus accumbens in responses to receipt and omission of gains in adults and adolescents

    Monique Ernst;Eric E. Nelson;Sandra Jazbec;Erin B. McClure

  • Neurobiology of decision making: a selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective.

    Monique Ernst;Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus

  • Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task

    Karen I. Bolla;Dana A. Eldreth;Edythe D. London;Kent A. Kiehl;Kent A. Kiehl

  • Behavioral and neural consequences of prenatal exposure to nicotine.

    Monique Ernst;Eric T. Moolchan;Miqun L. Robinson

  • Adolescent immaturity in attention-related brain engagement to emotional facial expressions

    Christopher S Monk;Erin B McClure;Eric E Nelson;Eric Zarahn

  • Neural systems and cue-induced cocaine craving.

    Katherine R Bonson;Steven J Grant;Carlo S Contoreggi;Jonathan M Links

  • Attention bias to threat in maltreated children: implications for vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology.

    Daniel S. Pine;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Lee Anne Montgomery

  • Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation and Attentional Bias in Response to Angry Faces in Adolescents With Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Christopher S Monk;Eric E Nelson;Erin B McClure;Karin Mogg

  • Abnormal Attention Modulation of Fear Circuit Function in Pediatric Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Erin B. McClure;Christopher S. Monk;Eric E. Nelson;Jessica M. Parrish

  • Decision-making in a Risk-taking Task: A PET Study

    Monique Ernst;Karen Bolla;Maria Mouratidis;Carlo Contoreggi

  • Orbitofrontal Cortex and Human Drug Abuse: Functional Imaging

    Edythe D. London;Monique Ernst;Steven Grant;Katherine Bonson

  • Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study.

    Monique Ernst;Eric E. Nelson;Erin B. McClure;Christopher S. Monk

  • Neural substrates of choice selection in adults and adolescents: Development of the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices

    Neir Eshel;Eric E. Nelson;R. James Blair;Daniel S. Pine

  • DOPA Decarboxylase Activity in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Adults. A [Fluorine-18]Fluorodopa Positron Emission Tomographic Study

    Monique Ernst;Alan J. Zametkin;John A. Matochik;Peter H. Jons

  • A developmental neurobiological model of motivated behavior: Anatomy, connectivity and ontogeny of the triadic nodes

    Monique Ernst;Julie L. Fudge

  • A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions

    Amanda E. Guyer;Christopher S. Monk;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Eric E. Nelson

  • Amygdala and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex function during anticipated peer evaluation in pediatric social anxiety

    Amanda E. Guyer;Jennifer Y. F. Lau;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Jessica Parrish

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Christian Grillon
Christian Grillon National Institutes of Health
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Eric E. Nelson
Eric E. Nelson The Ohio State University
Edythe D. London
Edythe D. London University of California, Los Angeles
Nicholas L. Balderston
Nicholas L. Balderston University of Pennsylvania
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Christopher S. Monk
Christopher S. Monk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amanda E. Guyer
Amanda E. Guyer University of California, Davis
Brenda E. Benson
Brenda E. Benson National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree opens a range of flexible options for students seeking to balance education with work or family responsibilities. Many U.S. universities now offer reputable accelerated programs, allowing learners to complete their degrees faster than in traditional settings. For instance, students interested in advanced studies can consider accelerated online psychology master's degrees in Virginia, which are designed to help professionals advance their careers quickly.

In addition, regional differences can shape the experience and opportunities available. Programs like accelerated online psychology programs in Texas and accelerated online psychology degrees in Washington cater to both in-state and out-of-state students, offering specialized courses in areas such as counseling, industrial-organizational psychology, or clinical practice.

Choosing an accredited, accelerated program—like those found among the accelerated online psychology degrees in Wisconsin—can also help graduates qualify for roles in human services, social work, research, and education. As the demand for psychology professionals grows, these online pathways provide efficient entry points into rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Monique Ernst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles