World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6082 5656 3306 3002 125 11952

Amanda E. Guyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda E. Guyer between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda E. Guyer published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2023. 21 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2023. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
2004 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda E. Guyer: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 6
2007 4
2008 6
2009 9
2010 2
2011 3
2012 5
2013 3
2014 8
2015 8
2016 9
2017 4
2018 13
2019 6
2020 7
2021 10
2022 11
2023 14
2024 10
2025 11
Total 152
Download as CSV

Amanda E. Guyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda E. Guyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda E. Guyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda E. Guyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda E. Guyer is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, medicine, and neuroscience, with a particular focus on clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry, and mental health. Their scholarly output includes work on child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, functional brain connectivity studies, and topics related to anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Their recent research contributions include the following papers:

  • Research Review: Brain network connectivity and the heterogeneity of depression in adolescence - a precision mental health perspective (2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry)
  • Adolescent Psychopathology: The Role of Brain-Based Diatheses, Sensitivities, and Susceptibilities (2020, Child Development Perspectives)
  • The longitudinal stability of fMRI activation during reward processing in adolescents and young adults (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Prospective associations between emotion regulation and depressive symptoms among Mexican-origin adolescents (2022, Emotion)
  • Conceptualizing the Influence of Social and Structural Determinants of Neurobiology and Mental Health: Why and How Biological Psychiatry Can Do Better at Addressing the Consequences of Inequity (2022, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Amanda E. Guyer include:

  • Paul D. Hastings
  • Richard W. Robins
  • Seth Adu-Afarwuah
  • Charles D. Arnold
  • Brietta M. Oaks

The venues where Amanda E. Guyer most frequently publishes are:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Emotion
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Developmental Psychology

Research topics that feature prominently across Amanda E. Guyer's work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Best Publications

  • Prevalence, Clinical Correlates, and Longitudinal Course of Severe Mood Dysregulation in Children

    Melissa A. Brotman;Mariana Schmajuk;Brendan A. Rich;Daniel P. Dickstein

  • Attention bias to threat in maltreated children: implications for vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology.

    Daniel S. Pine;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Lee Anne Montgomery

  • Are infant-toddler social-emotional and behavioral problems transient?

    Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan;Alice S. Carter;Joan Bosson-Heenan;Amanda E. Guyer

  • A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions

    Amanda E. Guyer;Christopher S. Monk;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Eric E. Nelson

  • Amygdala and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex function during anticipated peer evaluation in pediatric social anxiety

    Amanda E. Guyer;Jennifer Y. F. Lau;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Jessica Parrish

  • Social re-orientation and brain development: An expanded and updated view.

    Eric E. Nelson;Johanna M. Jarcho;Amanda E. Guyer

  • Behavioral Assessment of Emotion Discrimination, Emotion Regulation, and Cognitive Control in Childhood, Adolescence, and Adulthood

    Nim Tottenham;Nim Tottenham;Todd A Hare;B.J. Casey

  • Amygdala Activation During Emotion Processing of Neutral Faces in Children With Severe Mood Dysregulation Versus ADHD or Bipolar Disorder

    Melissa A. Brotman;Brendan A. Rich;Amanda E. Guyer;Jessica R. Lunsford

  • Peer victimization, cue interpretation, and internalizing symptoms: preliminary concurrent and longitudinal findings for children and adolescents.

    Mitchell J. Prinstein;Charissa S. L. Cheah;Amanda E. Guyer

  • Specificity of facial expression labeling deficits in childhood psychopathology

    Amanda E. Guyer;Erin B. McClure;Abby D. Adler;Melissa A. Brotman

  • The neurobiology of the emotional adolescent: From the inside out.

    Amanda E. Guyer;Jennifer S. Silk;Eric E. Nelson

  • Recognition of facial emotions among maltreated children with high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder

    Carrie L. Masten;Amanda E. Guyer;Hilary B. Hodgdon;Erin B. McClure

  • Common and Distinct Amygdala-Function Perturbations in Depressed vs Anxious Adolescents

    Katja Beesdo;Jennifer Y.F. Lau;Amanda E. Guyer;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Erin B. McClure-Tone

  • A preliminary study of medial temporal lobe function in youths with a history of caregiver deprivation and emotional neglect

    Françoise S. Maheu;Mary Dozier;Amanda E. Guyer;Darcy Mandell

  • Probing the Neural Correlates of Anticipated Peer Evaluation in Adolescence

    Amanda E. Guyer;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Nina D. Shiffrin;Daniel S. Pine

  • Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context.

    Roberta A. Schriber;Amanda E. Guyer

  • Neural circuitry underlying affective response to peer feedback in adolescence

    Amanda E. Guyer;Victoria R. Choate;Daniel S. Pine;Eric E. Nelson

  • Striatal Functional Alteration in Adolescents Characterized by Early Childhood Behavioral Inhibition

    Amanda E. Guyer;Eric E. Nelson;Koraly Perez-Edgar;Koraly Perez-Edgar;Michael G. Hardin;Michael G. Hardin

  • Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS-PL) for the assessment of preschool children – A preliminary psychometric study

    Boris Birmaher;Mary Ehmann;David A. Axelson;Benjamin I. Goldstein

  • Attention Alters Neural Responses to Evocative Faces in Behaviorally Inhibited Adolescents

    Koraly Pérez-Edgar;Roxann Roberson-Nay;Michael G. Hardin;Michael G. Hardin;Kaitlin Poeth

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Monique Ernst
Monique Ernst National Institutes of Health
Eric E. Nelson
Eric E. Nelson The Ohio State University
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Erika E. Forbes
Erika E. Forbes University of Pittsburgh
Alison E. Hipwell
Alison E. Hipwell University of Pittsburgh
Kate Keenan
Kate Keenan University of Chicago
Koraly Pérez-Edgar
Koraly Pérez-Edgar Pennsylvania State University
Richard W. Robins
Richard W. Robins University of California, Davis
Paul D. Hastings
Paul D. Hastings University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career pathways, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students pursue online degrees for greater flexibility, allowing them to balance education, work, and family life.

Social work is a particularly popular career route among psychology graduates. However, the degree needed to be a social worker in Delaware may differ from those required in other states. For instance, understanding the social worker education requirements in Florida is key if you plan to practice there. Typically, social workers require at least a bachelor's degree in social work or a related field, but some states have specific mandates.

Requirements can vary further—those looking to practice in Georgia should research the social worker degree requirements in Georgia. Similarly, meeting the Hawaii minimum degree requirement for social workers is essential for licensure there. Carefully review your state’s regulations to ensure your education pathway aligns with local career expectations.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda E. Guyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles