World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 85 1174 1031 729 624 339 33606

K. Luan Phan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by K. Luan Phan between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. K. Luan Phan published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2017. 29 of the 375 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2017. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 44 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 11 publications
1998 2025

375 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
K. Luan Phan: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 3
2003 9
2004 7
2005 9
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 7
2010 7
2011 7
2012 7
2013 21
2014 24
2015 14
2016 27
2017 44
2018 36
2019 16
2020 27
2021 34
2022 16
2023 9
2024 18
2025 11
Total 375
Download as CSV

K. Luan Phan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Luan Phan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 339 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 339
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

K. Luan Phan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Luan Phan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 85
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

K. Luan Phan is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

Their work concentrates on several main topics including anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes, as well as functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research topics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, neural and behavioral psychology studies, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) research, and traumatic brain injury research.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Depression and Anxiety

K. Luan Phan has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Olusola Ajilore
  • Stephanie M. Gorka
  • Heide Klumpp
  • Katie L. Burkhouse
  • Scott A. Langenecker

Representative recent publications include:

  • "Cortical volume abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder: an ENIGMA-psychiatric genomics consortium PTSD workgroup mega-analysis" (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • "Mega-analysis methods in ENIGMA: The experience of the generalized anxiety disorder working group" (2020, Human Brain Mapping)
  • "Cortical and subcortical brain structure in generalized anxiety disorder: findings from 28 research sites in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group" (2021, Translational Psychiatry)
  • "Resting state functional connectivity correlates of rumination and worry in internalizing psychopathologies" (2021, Depression and Anxiety)
  • "Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groups" (2021, Brain and Behavior)

Best Publications

  • Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI.

    K. Luan Phan;Tor D. Wager;Stephan F. Taylor;Israel Liberzon

  • The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology

    Stephen Maren;K. Luan Phan;Israel Liberzon

  • Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging.

    Tor D Wager;K.Luan Phan;Israel Liberzon;Stephan F Taylor

  • Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation

    Sarah J. Banks;Kamryn T. Eddy;Mike Angstadt;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Pradeep J. Nathan;Gregory J. Moore

  • Amygdala and orbitofrontal reactivity to social threat in individuals with impulsive aggression.

    Emil F. Coccaro;Michael S. McCloskey;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;K. Luan Phan

  • Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods

    Satoru Hayasaka;K. Luan Phan;Israel Liberzon;Keith J. Worsley

  • Effects of childhood poverty and chronic stress on emotion regulatory brain function in adulthood

    Pilyoung Kim;Gary W. Evans;Michael Angstadt;S. Shaun Ho

  • Association between Amygdala Hyperactivity to Harsh Faces and Severity of Social Anxiety in Generalized Social Phobia

    K. Luan Phan;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Pradeep J. Nathan;Manuel E. Tancer

  • Oxytocin attenuates amygdala reactivity to fear in generalized social anxiety disorder.

    Izelle Labuschagne;K Luan Phan;Amanda Wood;Mike Angstadt

  • Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Human Emotions

    K. Luan Phan;Tor D. Wager;Stephan F. Taylor;Israel Liberzon

  • Beyond threat: Amygdala reactivity across multiple expressions of facial affect

    Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Mike Angstadt;Laura M. Jelsone;Pradeep J. Nathan

  • Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: a trial-related fMRI study

    K. Luan Phan;K. Luan Phan;Stephan F. Taylor;Robert C. Welsh;Shao Hsuan Ho

  • Subjective rating of emotionally salient stimuli modulates neural activity

    Stephan F Taylor;K.Luan Phan;Laura R Decker;Israel Liberzon;Israel Liberzon

  • Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: An fMRI study

    Jennifer C. Britton;K. Luan Phan;Stephan F. Taylor;Robert C. Welsh

  • Corticolimbic blood flow in posttraumatic stress disorder during script-driven imagery

    Jennifer C. Britton;K. Luan Phan;Stephan F. Taylor;Lorraine M. Fig

  • A functional neuroimaging study of motivation and executive function.

    Stephan F. Taylor;Robert C. Welsh;Tor D. Wager;K. Luan Phan

  • The role of glutamate in anxiety and related disorders.

    Bernadette M Cortese;K Luan Phan

  • Cannabinoid Modulation of Amygdala Reactivity to Social Signals of Threat in Humans

    K. Luan Phan;Mike Angstadt;Jamie Golden;Ikechukwu Onyewuenyi

  • Corticolimbic function in impulsive aggressive behavior.

    Emil F. Coccaro;Chandra Sekhar Sripada;Rachel N. Yanowitch;K. Luan Phan

Frequent Co-Authors

Israel Liberzon
Israel Liberzon Texas A&M University
Pradeep J. Nathan
Pradeep J. Nathan University of Cambridge
Mike Angstadt
Mike Angstadt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott A. Langenecker
Scott A. Langenecker University of Utah
Daniel A. Fitzgerald
Daniel A. Fitzgerald University of Illinois at Chicago
Christopher S. Monk
Christopher S. Monk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kate D. Fitzgerald
Kate D. Fitzgerald Columbia University
Stewart A. Shankman
Stewart A. Shankman Northwestern University
Annmarie MacNamara
Annmarie MacNamara Texas A&M University
Autumn Kujawa
Autumn Kujawa Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online educational and career opportunities. One promising pathway is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a field closely related to psychology and communication sciences.

If you’re curious about how to become a speech language pathologist in Missouri, you’ll find that a background in psychology provides the foundation for many SLP graduate programs. Requirements may differ by state, so it’s essential to research specific licensing standards.

For anyone interested in SLP careers in other regions, it's worth examining the slp requirements in Montana, or learning about Nebraska speech pathologist certification requirements. Understanding these state-specific regulations helps you plan your educational path accordingly.

Additionally, if you’d like to know more about the process for other states, you can explore how to become a speech language pathologist in Nevada. These resources can help you align your psychology studies with the unique requirements of your desired SLP career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing K. Luan Phan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles