World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
25303
World Ranking
14656
National Ranking
610

Psychology

D-Index
86
Citations
25510
World Ranking
1145
National Ranking
54

Ruth A. Lanius publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth A. Lanius sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 299 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ruth A. Lanius D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth A. Lanius sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth A. Lanius is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Psychology, Medicine, and Neuroscience, with significant contributions across Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work has concentrated on key topics including Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Resilience and Mental Health, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ruth A. Lanius include:

  • Margaret C. McKinnon
  • Maria Densmore
  • Andrew A. Nicholson
  • Jean Théberge
  • Rakesh Jetly

Key publication venues where Ruth A. Lanius has published multiple works include:

  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Among recent papers, the selected publications are:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • The sense of self in the aftermath of trauma: lessons from the default mode network in posttraumatic stress disorder, 2020, European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • The brain-body disconnect: A somatic sensory basis for trauma-related disorders, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Classifying heterogeneous presentations of PTSD via the default mode, central executive, and salience networks with machine learning, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience

Ruth A. Lanius has also contributed to academic publishing through book authorship. One notable publication through Oxford University Press is Finding Solid Ground: Overcoming Obstacles in Trauma Treatment, published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Emotion Modulation in PTSD: Clinical and Neurobiological Evidence for a Dissociative Subtype

    Ruth A. Lanius;Eric Vermetten;Richard J. Loewenstein;Bethany Brand

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder

    Unknown

  • Neural Correlates of Traumatic Memories in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Functional MRI Investigation

    Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Maria Densmore;Kristine Boksman

  • Spontaneous Low-Frequency Fluctuations in the BOLD Signal in Schizophrenic Patients: Anomalies in the Default Network

    Robyn L. Bluhm;Jodi Miller;Ruth A. Lanius;Elizabeth A. Osuch

  • Brain activation during script-driven imagery induced dissociative responses in PTSD: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

    Ruth A Lanius;Peter C Williamson;Kristine Boksman;Maria Densmore

  • Neuroimaging studies of psychological interventions for mood and anxiety disorders: Empirical and methodological review

    Paul A Frewen;David J A Dozois;Ruth A Lanius

  • The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder: rationale, clinical and neurobiological evidence, and implications.

    Ruth A. Lanius M.D.;Bethany Brand;Eric Vermetten M.D.;Paul A. Frewen

  • Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: life after Criterion A.

    Chris R. Brewin;Ruth A. Lanius;Andrei Novac;Ulrich Schnyder

  • A review of neuroimaging studies in PTSD: Heterogeneity of response to symptom provocation

    R.A. Lanius;R. Bluhm;U. Lanius;C. Pain;C. Pain

  • Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma.

    Robyn L Bluhm;Peter C Williamson;Elizabeth A Osuch;Paul A Frewen

  • Smaller Hippocampal Volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Multisite ENIGMA-PGC Study: Subcortical Volumetry Results From Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Consortia

    Mark W. Logue;Sanne J.H. van Rooij;Emily L. Dennis;Sarah L. Davis

  • Neural correlates of reexperiencing, avoidance, and dissociation in PTSD: symptom dimensions and emotion dysregulation in responses to script-driven trauma imagery.

    James W. Hopper;Paul A. Frewen;Bessel A. van der Kolk;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Toward a psychobiology of posttraumatic self-dysregulation: reexperiencing, hyperarousal, dissociation, and emotional numbing.

    Paul A. Frewen;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Mindfulness-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: A review of the treatment literature and neurobiological evidence.

    Jenna E. Boyd;Ruth A. Lanius;Margaret C. McKinnon

  • Recall of emotional states in posttraumatic stress disorder: an fMRI investigation.

    Ruth A Lanius;Peter C Williamson;James Hopper;Maria Densmore

  • The Nature of Traumatic Memories: A 4-T fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis

    Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Maria Densmore;Kristine Boksman

  • Functional connectivity of dissociative responses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

    Ruth A. Lanius;Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Robyn L. Bluhm;Maria Densmore

  • Meta-analysis of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Resting state default-mode network connectivity in early depression using a seed region-of-interest analysis: Decreased connectivity with caudate nucleus

    Robyn Bluhm;Peter Williamson;Ruth Lanius;Jean Théberge

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Default mode network connectivity as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity in acutely traumatized subjects

    R. A. Lanius;R. L. Bluhm;N. J. Coupland;K. M. Hegadoren

  • Dissociative disorders in DSM-5.

    David Spiegel;Roberto Lewis-Fernández;Ruth Lanius;Eric Vermetten

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Paul A. Frewen
Paul A. Frewen University of Western Ontario
Maria Densmore
Maria Densmore University of Western Ontario
Jean Théberge
Jean Théberge University of Western Ontario
Richard W. J. Neufeld
Richard W. J. Neufeld University of Western Ontario
Eric Vermetten
Eric Vermetten Leiden University Medical Center
Richard J. Loewenstein
Richard J. Loewenstein University of Maryland, Baltimore
Bethany L. Brand
Bethany L. Brand Towson University
David J. A. Dozois
David J. A. Dozois University of Western Ontario
David Spiegel
David Spiegel Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees open the door to a variety of rewarding careers, especially in counseling and mental health support. One popular pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor, an area with high demand across the United States. Depending on your location, the requirements to pursue this profession can vary significantly.

For example, those interested in Irving can explore Irving substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local licensing and academic expectations. Similarly, if you are considering this career in Florida, review the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Jacksonville.

Each state often has different certification processes. In New Jersey, check out the Jersey City substance abuse counselor certification requirements for specific guidelines, while those in Missouri should read about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Kansas City for helpful insights.

By pursuing an online psychology degree, you’ll gain foundational knowledge and flexibility, making it easier to meet the unique demands of each state and launch a fulfilling career helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth A. Lanius

Trending Scientists