World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
7671
World Ranking
9719
National Ranking
961

Ruth E. Mann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth E. Mann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ruth E. Mann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth E. Mann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth E. Mann is affiliated with the Government of the United Kingdom, based in the United Kingdom. Their career details and academic contributions reflect a involvement with governmental research or policy, though specific roles or positions are not detailed.

There are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications listed for Ruth E. Mann. Consequently, there is no further information available regarding the extent or nature of their research output or collaborations.

Similarly, no main fields or subfields of study have been documented. This absence of data implies limited public information about their research specializations or academic focus areas.

No specific topics of work or awards have been associated with Ruth E. Mann. Such details are often indicators of recognized contributions or thematic expertise, which are not present here.

Best Publications

  • Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Factors:

    Ruth E. Mann;R. Karl Hanson;David Thornton

  • The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications

    Tony Ward;Ruth E. Mann;Theresa A. Gannon

  • A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions †

    Shadd Maruna;Ruth E. Mann

  • Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent Recidivism

    David Thornton;Ruth E Mann;Steve Webster;Linda Blud

  • Therapist characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: Tentative data on their relationship with indices of behaviour change

    W. L. Marshall;G. A. Serran;Y. M. Fernandez;R. Mulloy

  • Working Positively With Sexual Offenders: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Treatment

    William L. Marshall;Tony Ward;Ruth E. Mann;Heather Moulden

  • An Exploration of Protective Factors Supporting Desistance From Sexual Offending

    Michiel de Vries Robbé;Ruth E. Mann;Shadd Maruna;David Thornton

  • Therapist features in sexual offender treatment: their reliable identification and influence on behaviour change

    W. L. Marshall;G. Serran;H. Moulden;R. Mulloy

  • Evaluation of a National Prison-based Treatment Program for Sexual Offenders in England and Wales

    Caroline Friendship;Ruth E. Mann;Anthony R. Beech

  • Attitudes Supportive of Sexual Offending Predict Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis

    Leslie Helmus;R. Karl Hanson;Kelly M. Babchishin;Kelly M. Babchishin;Ruth E. Mann

  • Cognitive Distortions, Schemas, and Implicit Theories

    Ruth E. Mann;Anthony R. Beech

  • Approach versus avoidance goals in relapse prevention with sexual offenders.

    Ruth E. Mann;Stephen D. Webster;Caroline Schofield;William L. Marshall

  • Process issues in treatment: Application to sexual offender programs.

    G. Serran;Y. Fernandez;W. L. Marshall;R. E. Mann

  • Sexual offenders' explanations for their offending

    Ruth E. Mann;Clive R. Hollin

  • Treatment of sexual offenders who are in categorical denial: a pilot project.

    W. L. Marshall;David Thornton;Liam E. Marshall;Yolanda M. Fernandez

  • Empathy deficits and sexual offending: A model of obstacles to empathy

    Georgia Barnett;Ruth E. Mann

  • How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs?

    Jayson Ware;Ruth E. Mann

  • Victim Empathy Intervention With Sexual Offenders: Rehabilitation, Punishment, or Correctional Quackery?

    Ruth E. Mann;Georgia D. Barnett

  • The measurement and influence of child sexual abuse supportive beliefs

    Ruth Mann;Stephen Webster;Helen Wakeling;William Marshall

  • Inter-rater reliability of dynamic risk assessment with sexual offenders

    Stephen D. Webster;Ruth E. Mann;Adam J. Carter;Julia Long

Frequent Co-Authors

William L. Marshall
William L. Marshall Queen's University
David Thornton
David Thornton Haukeland University Hospital
Clive R. Hollin
Clive R. Hollin University of Leicester
Shadd Maruna
Shadd Maruna Queen's University Belfast
Tony Ward
Tony Ward Victoria University of Wellington
Anthony R. Beech
Anthony R. Beech University of Birmingham
R. Karl Hanson
R. Karl Hanson Carleton University
Rainer Banse
Rainer Banse University of Bonn
Theresa A. Gannon
Theresa A. Gannon University of Kent

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse career pathways, including the fast-growing fields of social work and counseling. Many students opt for online psychology or social work degrees to gain the necessary knowledge and flexibility, especially when balancing work or family commitments. Online degrees can also help prepare you for state licensing requirements and specialized careers.

Each state sets its own requirements for becoming a social worker. For example, the requirements to be a social worker in Pennsylvania vary in coursework and clinical experience compared to other locations. Similarly, you can learn more about how to become a social worker in Rhode Island, where policies and degree requirements are unique.

In the Southeast, South Carolina social work education requirements highlight specific academic pathways and fieldwork needed for licensure. Those interested in the Midwest should review guidelines for becoming a social worker in South Dakota, which combine degree credentials and state-approved supervised practice.

Choosing the right degree and understanding these state-specific regulations is vital. Be sure to research online program accreditation and connect your educational path to your desired career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth E. Mann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles