World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2855 2620 168 154 176 14508

Paul A. Frewen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul A. Frewen between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul A. Frewen published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 13 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
2002 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul A. Frewen: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 8
2007 3
2008 7
2009 1
2010 4
2011 5
2012 13
2013 4
2014 15
2015 18
2016 23
2017 19
2018 6
2019 8
2020 20
2021 8
2022 11
2023 15
2024 7
2025 6
Total 203
Download as CSV

Paul A. Frewen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Frewen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul A. Frewen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Frewen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul A. Frewen is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research contributions span psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a concentration on clinical psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Their publications have appeared frequently in several venues, including:

  • European journal of psychotraumatology
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Frewen include:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • Neuroimaging the consciousness of self: Review, and conceptual-methodological framework, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Screening for consequences of trauma - an update on the global collaboration on traumatic stress, 2020, European journal of psychotraumatology
  • Classifying heterogeneous presentations of PTSD via the default mode, central executive, and salience networks with machine learning, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: A preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical

Frequent collaborators in their scientific work include:

  • Ruth A. Lanius
  • Rakesh Jetly
  • Andrew A. Nicholson
  • Maria Densmore
  • Jean Théberge

The main fields of study reflected in Frewen's work are:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their research focuses on subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Their main topics of investigation cover a range of areas, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the Evidence for the Trauma and Fantasy Models of Dissociation

    Constance J. Dalenberg;Bethany L. Brand;David H. Gleaves;Martin J. Dorahy

  • Letting Go: Mindfulness and Negative Automatic Thinking

    Paul A. Frewen;Elspeth M. Evans;Nicholas Maraj;David J. A. Dozois

  • Neuroimaging studies of psychological interventions for mood and anxiety disorders: Empirical and methodological review

    Paul A Frewen;David J A Dozois;Ruth A Lanius

  • The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder: rationale, clinical and neurobiological evidence, and implications.

    Ruth A. Lanius M.D.;Bethany Brand;Eric Vermetten M.D.;Paul A. Frewen

  • Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma.

    Robyn L Bluhm;Peter C Williamson;Elizabeth A Osuch;Paul A Frewen

  • Neural correlates of reexperiencing, avoidance, and dissociation in PTSD: symptom dimensions and emotion dysregulation in responses to script-driven trauma imagery.

    James W. Hopper;Paul A. Frewen;Bessel A. van der Kolk;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Toward a psychobiology of posttraumatic self-dysregulation: reexperiencing, hyperarousal, dissociation, and emotional numbing.

    Paul A. Frewen;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Meta-analysis of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Selective attention to threat versus reward: Meta-analysis and neural-network modeling of the dot-probe task

    Paul A Frewen;David J A Dozois;Marc F Joanisse;Richard W J Neufeld

  • Mind over chatter: Plastic up-regulation of the fMRI salience network directly after EEG neurofeedback

    Tomas Ros;Jean Théberge;Jean Théberge;Paul A. Frewen;Rosemarie Kluetsch;Rosemarie Kluetsch

  • The neurobiology of emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: Amygdala downregulation via real-time fMRI neurofeedback.

    Andrew A. Nicholson;Daniela Rabellino;Maria Densmore;Paul A. Frewen

  • A systematic meta-analysis of the Stroop task in depression.

    Amanda M. Epp;Keith S. Dobson;David J.A. Dozois;Paul A. Frewen

  • Restoring large-scale brain networks in PTSD and related disorders: a proposal for neuroscientifically-informed treatment interventions

    Ruth A. Lanius;Paul A. Frewen;Mischa Tursich;Rakesh Jetly

  • Evidence for a dissociative subtype of PTSD by latent profile and confirmatory factor analyses in a civilian sample.

    Carolin Steuwe;Ruth A. Lanius;Paul A. Frewen

  • Clinical and neural correlates of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;Ruth A. Lanius;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld

  • How understanding the neurobiology of complex post-traumatic stress disorder can inform clinical practice: a social cognitive and affective neuroscience approach

    R. A. Lanius;R. L. Bluhm;P. A. Frewen

  • Association of trauma exposure with proinflammatory activity: a transdiagnostic meta-analysis.

    M Tursich;R W J Neufeld;P A Frewen;S Harricharan

  • Plastic modulation of PTSD resting-state networks and subjective wellbeing by EEG neurofeedback.

    Rosemarie C. Kluetsch;Tomas Ros;Jean Théberge;Paul A. Frewen

  • The Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Unique Resting-State Functional Connectivity of Basolateral and Centromedial Amygdala Complexes

    Andrew A Nicholson;Maria Densmore;Paul A Frewen;Jean Théberge

  • Fear conditioning and early life vulnerabilities: two distinct pathways of emotional dysregulation and brain dysfunction in PTSD

    Ruth A. Lanius;Paul A. Frewen;Eric Vermetten;Rachel Yehuda

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth A. Lanius
Ruth A. Lanius University of Western Ontario
Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Jean Théberge
Jean Théberge University of Western Ontario
Maria Densmore
Maria Densmore University of Western Ontario
Richard W. J. Neufeld
Richard W. J. Neufeld University of Western Ontario
David J. A. Dozois
David J. A. Dozois University of Western Ontario
Christian Schmahl
Christian Schmahl Heidelberg University
Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Bethany L. Brand
Bethany L. Brand Towson University
David Spiegel
David Spiegel Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a wide range of career opportunities in counseling, mental health, and human services. Many programs are now designed to offer flexible, accelerated pathways that let students complete their studies faster and start their careers sooner.

If you are interested in becoming a counselor, you’ll find several expedited options depending on your location and career goals. For those in Indiana, the fastest way to become a counselor in Indiana provides insight into streamlined counselor education and licensing routes. Students in Iowa can refer to the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Iowa for specific state requirements and program shortcuts.

Additionally, some states highlight standout programs for speed and flexibility. Discover Kansas fastest counseling programs for information about online and hybrid offerings. In Kentucky, learn about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Kentucky for an overview of licensing, internships, and educational formats. These resources can help you select a degree or pathway tailored to your timeline and aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Frewen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles