World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
21506
World Ranking
2916
National Ranking
1676

Mark W. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark W. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Miller is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has an extensive publication record spanning the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research work predominantly focuses on clinical psychology and molecular biology, addressing topics related to neurobiology, trauma, and stress responses.

The scientist's research covers a range of specialized subjects including:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Key recent scientific papers by Mark W. Miller include:

  • Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of PTSD across 10 military and civilian cohorts identifies methylation changes in AHRR, 2020, Nature Communications
  • An epigenome-wide association study of posttraumatic stress disorder in US veterans implicates several new DNA methylation loci, 2020, Clinical Epigenetics
  • Analysis of Genetically Regulated Gene Expression Identifies a Prefrontal PTSD Gene, SNRNP35, Specific to Military Cohorts, 2020, Cell Reports
  • African ancestry GWAS of dementia in a large military cohort identifies significant risk loci, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Persistent Dissociation and Its Neural Correlates in Predicting Outcomes After Trauma Exposure, 2022, American Journal of Psychiatry

Among their frequent coauthors are:

  • Erika J. Wolf
  • Mark W. Logue
  • Karestan C. Koenen
  • Ronald C. Kessler
  • Sarah D. Linnstaedt

In addition to journal publications, Mark W. Miller has contributed to book literature, including a work published by the Water Environment Federation titled Kinetic Considerations for Metabolic Selectors Design for Process Intensification in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety.

    Erika J. Wolf;Kelly M. Harrington;Shaunna L. Clark;Mark W. Miller

  • National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria.

    Dean G. Kilpatrick;Heidi S. Resnick;Melissa E. Milanak;Mark W. Miller;Mark W. Miller

  • Inventory of Complicated Grief: A scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss

    Holly G. Prigerson;Paul K. Maciejewski;Charles F. Reynolds;Andrew J. Bierhals

  • International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci

    Caroline M. Nievergelt;Caroline M. Nievergelt;Adam X. Maihofer;Adam X. Maihofer;Torsten Klengel;Torsten Klengel;Elizabeth G. Atkinson;Elizabeth G. Atkinson

  • Allelic Variation in the Serotonin Transporter Promoter Affects Onset of Paroxetine Treatment Response in Late-Life Depression

    Bruce G Pollock;Robert E Ferrell;Benoit H Mulsant;Sati Mazumdar

  • Smaller Hippocampal Volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Multisite ENIGMA-PGC Study: Subcortical Volumetry Results From Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Consortia

    Mark W. Logue;Sanne J.H. van Rooij;Emily L. Dennis;Sarah L. Davis

  • Largest GWAS of PTSD (N=20 070) yields genetic overlap with schizophrenia and sex differences in heritability

    L. E. Duncan;A. Ratanatharathorn;A. E. Aiello;L. M. Almli

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder in the US veteran population: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study

    Blair E. Wisco;Brian P. Marx;Erika J. Wolf;Mark W. Miller

  • A latent class analysis of dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence for a dissociative subtype.

    Erika J. Wolf;Mark W. Miller;Annemarie F. Reardon;Karen A. Ryabchenko

  • Traumatic stress, oxidative stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: neurodegeneration and the accelerated-aging hypothesis.

    Mark W. Miller;Naomi Sadeh

  • Externalizing and internalizing subtypes of combat-related PTSD: a replication and extension using the PSY-5 scales.

    Mark W. Miller;Danny G. Kaloupek;Amy L. Dillon;Terence M. Keane

  • Personality and the Etiology and Expression of PTSD: A Three‐Factor Model Perspective

    Mark W. Miller

  • THE DISSOCIATIVE SUBTYPE OF PTSD: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION

    Erika J. Wolf;Carole A. Lunney;Mark W. Miller;Mark W. Miller;Patricia A. Resick;Patricia A. Resick

  • The Prevalence and Latent Structure of Proposed DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in U.S. National and Veteran Samples

    Mark W Miller;Erika J. Wolf;Dean G. Kilpatrick;Heidi S Resnick

  • A genome-wide association study of post-traumatic stress disorder identifies the retinoid-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA) gene as a significant risk locus

    Mark W. Logue;Clinton Baldwin;Guia Guffanti;Efi Melista

  • Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire profiles of veterans with traumatic combat exposure: Externalizing and internalizing subtypes.

    Mark W. Miller;Jennifer L. Greif;Alethea A. Smith

  • Traumatic stress and accelerated DNA methylation age: A meta-analysis

    Erika J Wolf;Hannah Maniates;Nicole Nugent;Adam X Maihofer

  • Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Neuroprogression in Chronic PTSD.

    Mark W. Miller;Alex P. Lin;Erika J. Wolf;Danielle R. Miller

  • Genomic predictors of combat stress vulnerability and resilience in U.S. Marines: A genome-wide association study across multiple ancestries implicates PRTFDC1 as a potential PTSD gene.

    Caroline M. Nievergelt;Caroline M. Nievergelt;Adam X. Maihofer;Maja Mustapic;Kate A. Yurgil

  • ICD-11 Complex PTSD in US National and Veteran Samples: Prevalence and Structural Associations with PTSD.

    Erika J. Wolf;Mark W. Miller;Mark W. Miller;Dean Kilpatrick;Heidi S. Resnick

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder: anxiety or traumatic stress disorder?

    Patricia A. Resick;Mark W. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Erika J. Wolf
Erika J. Wolf Boston University
William P. Milberg
William P. Milberg Boston University
Regina E. McGlinchey
Regina E. McGlinchey Boston University
Kerry J. Ressler
Kerry J. Ressler Harvard University
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
Naomi Sadeh
Naomi Sadeh University of Delaware
Caroline M. Nievergelt
Caroline M. Nievergelt University of California, San Diego
Bernhard Wett
Bernhard Wett University of Innsbruck
Dewleen G. Baker
Dewleen G. Baker University of California, San Diego
Sudhir Murthy
Sudhir Murthy Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to various online degree programs and rewarding career pathways, especially in social work. Students interested in becoming licensed social workers should be aware of specific educational requirements, which often differ by state.

For instance, those considering a career in Maryland should review the social worker education requirements in Maryland. In Massachusetts, candidates need to follow the Massachusetts education requirements for social workers to ensure they meet state standards.

Similarly, if you plan to practice in Michigan, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the social worker education requirements in Michigan. Prospective social workers in Minnesota should understand the Minnesota education requirements for social workers as part of their academic preparation.

Choosing the right online degree and understanding state-specific requirements can help streamline your journey toward a fulfilling psychology or social work career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles