World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Regina E. McGlinchey

Regina E. McGlinchey

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6175 5740 3358 3045 217 9000

Regina E. McGlinchey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Regina E. McGlinchey between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Regina E. McGlinchey published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2021. 1 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Regina E. McGlinchey: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 3
2006 4
2007 0
2008 9
2009 5
2010 6
2011 9
2012 5
2013 12
2014 10
2015 11
2016 15
2017 21
2018 14
2019 24
2020 18
2021 26
2022 21
2023 15
2024 2
2025 0
2026 1
Total 234
Download as CSV

Regina E. McGlinchey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina E. McGlinchey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 217 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 217
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Regina E. McGlinchey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina E. McGlinchey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Regina E. McGlinchey is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research spans several fields of study, primarily Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience, with notable work in subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

McGlinchey has contributed articles to several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues encompass:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • William Milberg
  • Catherine B. Fortier
  • Jennifer R. Fonda
  • Michael Esterman
  • Joseph DeGutis

Among recent published papers, several illustrate the range and focus of their research:

  • Test-retest reliability of FreeSurfer automated hippocampal subfield segmentation within and across scanners, 2020, NeuroImage
  • An epigenome-wide association study of posttraumatic stress disorder in US veterans implicates several new DNA methylation loci, 2020, Clinical Epigenetics
  • MemAID: Memory advancement with intranasal insulin vs. placebo in type 2 diabetes and control participants: a randomized clinical trial, 2022, Journal of Neurology
  • Mild traumatic brain injury impacts associations between limbic system microstructure and post-traumatic stress disorder symptomatology, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • PTSD is associated with increased DNA methylation across regions of HLA-DPB1 and SPATC1L, 2020, Brain Behavior and Immunity

Best Publications

  • The anticholinergic risk scale and anticholinergic adverse effects in older persons.

    James L. Rudolph;Marci J. Salow;Michael C. Angelini;Regina E. McGlinchey

  • International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci

    Caroline M. Nievergelt;Caroline M. Nievergelt;Adam X. Maihofer;Adam X. Maihofer;Torsten Klengel;Torsten Klengel;Elizabeth G. Atkinson;Elizabeth G. Atkinson

  • Smaller Hippocampal Volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Multisite ENIGMA-PGC Study: Subcortical Volumetry Results From Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Consortia

    Mark W. Logue;Sanne J.H. van Rooij;Emily L. Dennis;Sarah L. Davis

  • Measurement of post-operative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

    James L. Rudolph;Kimberly A. Schreiber;Deborah J. Culley;Regina E. McGlinchey

  • Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Cognition in the Elderly.

    Elizabeth C. Leritz;Regina E. McGlinchey;Regina E. McGlinchey;Regina E. McGlinchey;Ida Kellison;James L. Rudolph;James L. Rudolph;James L. Rudolph

  • The Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (BAT-L) semistructured interview: evidence of research utility and validity.

    Catherine Brawn Fortier;Melissa M. Amick;Laura Grande;Susan McGlynn

  • Deployment-related psychiatric and behavioral conditions and their association with functional disability in OEF/OIF/OND veterans.

    Sara M. Lippa;Sara M. Lippa;Jennifer R. Fonda;Jennifer R. Fonda;Catherine B. Fortier;Catherine B. Fortier;Melissa A. Amick;Melissa A. Amick

  • ASSOCIATION BETWEEN WHITE MATTER MICROSTRUCTURE, EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS AND PROCESSING SPEED IN OLDER ADULTS: THE IMPACT OF VASCULAR HEALTH

    Heidi I.L. Jacobs;Heidi I.L. Jacobs;Elizabeth C. Leritz;Victoria J. Williams;Martin P.J. Van Boxtel

  • Accelerated DNA methylation age: Associations with PTSD and neural integrity.

    Erika J. Wolf;Erika J. Wolf;Mark W. Logue;Jasmeet P. Hayes;Naomi Sadeh;Naomi Sadeh

  • Thickness of the human cerebral cortex is associated with metrics of cerebrovascular health in a normative sample of community dwelling older adults.

    Elizabeth C. Leritz;David H. Salat;David H. Salat;Victoria J. Williams;Victoria J. Williams;Victoria J. Williams;David M. Schnyer

  • Brain network disturbance related to posttraumatic stress and traumatic brain injury in veterans.

    Jeffrey M. Spielberg;Regina E. McGlinchey;William P. Milberg;David H. Salat

  • The correlation of methylation levels measured using Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood samples.

    Mark W Logue;Alicia K Smith;Erika J Wolf;Erika J Wolf;Hannah Maniates

  • A methodology for assessing deployment trauma and its consequences in OEF/OIF/OND veterans: The TRACTS longitudinal prospective cohort study.

    Regina E. McGlinchey;Regina E. McGlinchey;William P. Milberg;William P. Milberg;Jennifer R. Fonda;Catherine Brawn Fortier;Catherine Brawn Fortier

  • Reduced cortical thickness with increased lifetime burden of PTSD in OEF/OIF Veterans and the impact of comorbid TBI☆

    Emily R. Lindemer;David H. Salat;Elizabeth C. Leritz;Elizabeth C. Leritz;Regina E. McGlinchey;Regina E. McGlinchey

  • Inter-individual variation in blood pressure is associated with regional white matter integrity in generally healthy older adults

    David H. Salat;Victoria J. Williams;Elizabeth C. Leritz;David M. Schnyer

  • SKA2 methylation is associated with decreased prefrontal cortical thickness and greater PTSD severity among trauma-exposed veterans.

    Naomi Sadeh;Jeffrey M. Spielberg;Jeffrey M. Spielberg;Mark W. Logue;Erika J. Wolf;Erika J. Wolf

  • Reduced Cortical Thickness in Abstinent Alcoholics and Association with Alcoholic Behavior

    Catherine B. Fortier;Elizabeth C. Leritz;David H. Salat;Jonathan R. Venne

  • Mild traumatic brain injury is associated with reduced cortical thickness in those at risk for Alzheimer’s disease

    Jasmeet P. Hayes;Mark W. Logue;Mark W. Logue;Naomi Sadeh;Naomi Sadeh;Jeffrey M. Spielberg

  • Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention: A robust replication and extension.

    Francesca C. Fortenbaugh;David Rothlein;Regina McGlinchey;Joseph DeGutis

  • Test-retest reliability of FreeSurfer automated hippocampal subfield segmentation within and across scanners.

    Emma M. Brown;Meghan E. Pierce;Dustin C. Clark;Bruce R. Fischl

  • Posttraumatic Psychological Symptoms are Associated with Reduced Inhibitory Control, not General Executive Dysfunction.

    Joseph DeGutis;Michael Esterman;Bay McCulloch;Andrew Rosenblatt

  • Altered white matter microstructural organization in posttraumatic stress disorder across 3047 adults: results from the PGC-ENIGMA PTSD consortium

    Emily L Dennis;Seth G Disner;Seth G Disner;Negar Fani;Lauren E Salminen

  • Complicating factors associated with mild traumatic brain injury: impact on pain and posttraumatic stress disorder treatment.

    John D. Otis;John D. Otis;Regina McGlinchey;Regina McGlinchey;Jennifer J. Vasterling;Jennifer J. Vasterling;Robert D. Kerns

Frequent Co-Authors

William P. Milberg
William P. Milberg Boston University
David H. Salat
David H. Salat Harvard University
Mark W. Miller
Mark W. Miller Boston University
Erika J. Wolf
Erika J. Wolf Boston University
Michael Esterman
Michael Esterman Boston University
Naomi Sadeh
Naomi Sadeh University of Delaware
Jeffrey M. Spielberg
Jeffrey M. Spielberg University of Delaware
Kerry J. Ressler
Kerry J. Ressler Harvard University
Mieke Verfaellie
Mieke Verfaellie Boston University
Lewis A. Lipsitz
Lewis A. Lipsitz Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a wide range of career pathways. Many students decide to pursue roles as mental health counselors, a profession seeing growing demand across the United States. Understanding the steps to become a counselor can vary by location, so it’s essential to know the local education and licensure requirements.

For example, those interested in working in Indiana can review the Indianapolis mental health counselor education requirements to learn about local guidelines. Similarly, if you’re considering California, take a look at the Irvine mental health counselor education requirements. Students aspiring to practice in Texas should review how to become a mental health counselor in Irving.

Each path shares core steps—completing a relevant degree, gaining supervised experience, and passing certification exams. However, regional differences exist. For instance, the mental health counselor requirements in Jacksonville may require specific coursework or internship hours.

Exploring your options and understanding the steps in your chosen city will help ensure a smooth pathway from online study to successful licensure and impactful work in mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Regina E. McGlinchey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles