World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mieke Verfaellie

Mieke Verfaellie

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2090 1899 1211 1074 213 15761

Mieke Verfaellie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mieke Verfaellie between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mieke Verfaellie published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2024. 17 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2024. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mieke Verfaellie: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 5
1989 2
1990 5
1991 7
1992 2
1993 5
1994 3
1995 7
1996 9
1997 5
1998 2
1999 2
2000 7
2001 6
2002 7
2003 4
2004 7
2005 5
2006 10
2007 3
2008 6
2009 9
2010 8
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 4
2015 11
2016 8
2017 11
2018 5
2019 8
2020 7
2021 8
2022 3
2023 11
2024 15
2025 2
Total 237
Download as CSV

Mieke Verfaellie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mieke Verfaellie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 213
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mieke Verfaellie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mieke Verfaellie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mieke Verfaellie is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, and molecular biology.

The main topics of their work include memory and neural mechanisms, memory processes and influences, identity, memory and therapy, face recognition and perception, epigenetics and DNA methylation, face recognition and analysis, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Frequent venues for publication include Cortex, Neuropsychologia, UNC Libraries, Journal of Neuroscience, and Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience.

Recent papers by Mieke Verfaellie encompass the following:

  • An epigenome-wide association study of posttraumatic stress disorder in US veterans implicates several new DNA methylation loci (2020, Clinical Epigenetics)
  • Characterizing developmental prosopagnosia beyond face perception: Impaired recollection but intact familiarity recognition (2020, Cortex)
  • Maintenance of Procedural Motor Memory across Brief Rest Periods Requires the Hippocampus (2024, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Evidence for normal novel object recognition abilities in developmental prosopagnosia (2020, Royal Society Open Science)
  • Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task (2021, PLoS ONE)

Mieke Verfaellie has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Virginie Patt, William Milberg, Joseph DeGutis, Erika J. Wolf, and Elbert Geuze.

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 2008.

Best Publications

  • Working Memory for Conjunctions Relies on the Medial Temporal Lobe

    Ingrid R. Olson;Katie Page;Katherine Sledge Moore;Anjan Chatterjee

  • The Neuropsychology of Memory Illusions: False Recall and Recognition in Amnesic Patients

    Daniel L. Schacter;Daniel L. Schacter;Mieke Verfaellie;Mieke Verfaellie;Dan Pradere

  • Interdependence of episodic and semantic memory: evidence from neuropsychology.

    Daniel L. Greenberg;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Medial Temporal Lobe Damage Causes Deficits in Episodic Memory and Episodic Future Thinking Not Attributable to Deficits in Narrative Construction

    Elizabeth Race;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning.

    Ian G. Dobbins;David M. Schnyer;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder in returning veterans: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience.

    Jennifer J. Vasterling;Mieke Verfaellie;Mieke Verfaellie;Karen D. Sullivan

  • A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: Evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition

    Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;David M. Schnyer;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie

  • The neurological and cognitive sequelae of cardiac arrest

    Chun Lim;M. P. Alexander;M. P. Alexander;G. LaFleche;David Schnyer

  • Semantic processing in the neglected visual field: Evidence from a lexical decision task

    Regina McGlinchey-berroth;William P. Milberg;Mieke Verfaellie;Michael Alexander

  • Traumatic Brain Injury as a Disorder of Brain Connectivity.

    Jasmeet P. Hayes;Erin D. Bigler;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Patterns of autobiographical memory loss in medial-temporal lobe amnesic patients.

    R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Morris Moscovitch;Jonathan K. Foster;David M. Schnyer

  • A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex

    David M Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie;Michael P Alexander;Michael P Alexander;Ginette LaFleche

  • Illusory memories in amnesic patients: conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

    D.L. Schacter;M. Verfaellie;Anes

  • Status of recognition memory in amnesia.

    Mieke Verfaellie;Jonathan R. Treadwell

  • Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident

    Susan E Fasoli;Catherine A Trombly;Linda Tickle-Degnen;Mieke H Verfaellie

  • Working memory and long‐term memory for faces: Evidence from fMRI and global amnesia for involvement of the medial temporal lobes

    Elizabeth A. Nichols;Yun-Ching Kao;Mieke Verfaellie;John D.E. Gabrieli

  • Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury: Recommendations From the Interagency Working Group on Demographics and Clinical Assessment

    Andrew I. R. Maas;Cynthia L. Harrison-Felix;David Menon;P. David Adelson

  • Fear recognition deficits after focal brain damage A cautionary note

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;S. R. Galper;J. F. Comer;S. L. Reminger

  • Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory

    Anthony D. Wagner;John D. E. Gabrieli;Mieke Verfaellie

  • The medial temporal lobes are critical for reward-based decision making under conditions that promote episodic future thinking.

    Daniela J. Palombo;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie;Mieke Verfaellie

  • RAPID COMMUNICATION A Critical Role for the Anterior Hippocampus in Relational Memory: Evidence From an fMRI Study Comparing Associative and Item Recognition

    Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret M. Keane
Margaret M. Keane Boston University
William P. Milberg
William P. Milberg Boston University
David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
Michael P. Alexander
Michael P. Alexander Harvard University
Laird S. Cermak
Laird S. Cermak Boston University
Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Kenneth M. Heilman
Kenneth M. Heilman University of Florida
David H. Salat
David H. Salat Harvard University
Regina E. McGlinchey
Regina E. McGlinchey Boston University
Dawn Bowers
Dawn Bowers University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to diverse and rewarding career pathways, with mental health counseling being one of the most popular options. Online degrees offer flexible learning opportunities, making it easier to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

It's important to understand that becoming a mental health counselor involves meeting specific educational requirements and gaining practical experience. The path can vary by location. For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in New Orleans must complete state-approved programs and supervised practice hours.

Aspiring professionals in New York can learn about the steps to become a mental health counselor in New York City, while those interested in New Jersey should review Newark mental health counselor education requirements. Virginia residents can explore how to become a mental health counselor in Norfolk.

Researching local licensing criteria and online degree options can help you find the right pathway. Each state may have unique requirements, so staying informed is key to a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Mieke Verfaellie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles