World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
83
Citations
26486
World Ranking
1267
National Ranking
65

Brian Levine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Levine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 220 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian Levine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Levine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Levine is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research addresses numerous topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment research, memory processes and influences, memory and neural mechanisms, identity, memory, and therapy, functional brain connectivity studies, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, and cognitive functions and memory.

Brian Levine has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Cognition
  • Brain Communications

Some of their recent papers include:

  • The Truth Is Out There: Accuracy in Recall of Verifiable Real-World Events, 2020, Psychological Science
  • Linking Detail to Temporal Structure in Naturalistic-Event Recall, 2020, Psychological Science
  • Classification of General and Personal Semantic Details in the Autobiographical Interview, 2020, Neuropsychologia
  • When I'm 64: Age-Related Variability in Over 40,000 Online Cognitive Test Takers, 2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • On the Relationship Between Trait Autobiographical Episodic Memory and Spatial Navigation, 2020, Memory & Cognition

Brian Levine collaborates regularly with multiple researchers, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Angela K. Troyer
  • Donna Kwan
  • Malcolm A. Binns
  • Kelly M. Sunderland
  • J. B. Orange

The body of their published work contributes to understanding complex aspects of cognitive function, memory, and neurological health, particularly in relation to aging and dementia-related conditions. Their research output comprises over fifty publications in medicine and neuroscience, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to studying the brain and cognition.

Best Publications

  • Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval.

    Brian Levine;Eva Svoboda;Janine F. Hay;Gordon Winocur

  • The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis.

    Eva Svoboda;Margaret C. McKinnon;Brian Levine

  • Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes.

    Donald T. Stuss;Brian Levine

  • The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures

    R. Nathan Spreng;Margaret C. McKinnon;Raymond A. Mar;Brian Levine

  • Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory

    Morris Moscovitch;R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Asaf Gilboa;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis

  • Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of goal management training.

    Brian Levine;Ian H. Robertson;Linda Clare;Gina Carter

  • Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes.

    D.T. Stuss;B. Levine;M.P. Alexander;M.P. Alexander;M.P. Alexander;J. Hong

  • Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location.

    D.T Stuss;D Floden;M.P Alexander;M.P Alexander;M.P Alexander;B Levine

  • Episodic memory and the self in a case of isolated retrograde amnesia.

    B Levine;S E Black;R Cabeza;M Sinden

  • The effects of focal anterior and posterior brain lesions on verbal fluency

    Donald Thomas Stuss;Michael Paxson Alexander;Lisa Hamer;Carole Palumbo

  • Personal semantics: at the crossroads of semantic and episodic memory

    Louis Renoult;Patrick S.R. Davidson;Daniela J. Palombo;Morris Moscovitch

  • The Trail Making Test: a study in focal lesion patients.

    Donald T. Stuss;Sean M. Bisschop;Michael P. Alexander;Brian Levine

  • Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training.

    Brian Levine;Tom A. Schweizer;Tom A. Schweizer;Charlene O'Connor;Gary Turner;Gary Turner

  • Medial temporal lobe structures are needed to re-experience remote autobiographical memories: evidence from H.M. and W.R.

    Sarah Steinvorth;Brian Levine;Suzanne Corkin

  • The Functional Neuroanatomy of Episodic and Semantic Autobiographical Remembering: A Prospective Functional MRI Study

    Brian Levine;Gary R. Turner;Danielle Tisserand;Stephanie J. Hevenor

  • Cognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: effects on strategic behavior in relation to goal management.

    Brian Levine;Donald T. Stuss;Gordon Winocur;Malcolm A. Binns

  • Autobiographical memory and the self in time: brain lesion effects, functional neuroanatomy, and lifespan development.

    Brian Levine

  • The temporal distribution of past and future autobiographical events across the lifespan.

    R. Nathan Spreng;Brian Levine

  • Treating Working Memory Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Review of the Neurobiology

    Tristram A. Lett;Aristotle N. Voineskos;James L. Kennedy;Brian Levine

  • The Toronto traumatic brain injury study: Injury severity and quantified MRI

    B. Levine;N. Kovacevic;E. I. Nica;G. Cheung

  • Consciousness of subjective time in the brain.

    Lars Nyberg;Alice S. N. Kim;Reza Habib;Brian Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Donald T. Stuss
Donald T. Stuss University of Toronto
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Malcolm A. Binns
Malcolm A. Binns University of Toronto
Michael P. Alexander
Michael P. Alexander Harvard University
Fergus I. M. Craik
Fergus I. M. Craik University of Toronto
Michael L. Schwartz
Michael L. Schwartz Yale University
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
Angela K. Troyer
Angela K. Troyer University of Toronto
Gordon Winocur
Gordon Winocur University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online offers flexibility and access to some of the nation’s top programs. Whether you want to study in Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, or California, you’ll find that each state has a range of respected institutions providing quality education at a distance.

For instance, you can explore the best online bachelor's in psychology degree programs ranking in Illinois to find options recognized for their academic rigor and student support. Similarly, those interested in the Northeast can review the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in New York and best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in Pennsylvania to compare curricula, tuition rates, and career support services.

In the West, students may consider the best online psychology degree rankings in California for programs that balance flexible scheduling with real-world learning experiences.

With a psychology degree, graduates can pursue careers in counseling, human resources, social work, marketing, and more. Online degrees are increasingly recognized by employers, making this educational path a viable and valuable option for many aspiring professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Levine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles