World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
84
Citations
45171
World Ranking
1207
National Ranking
742

Neuroscience

D-Index
84
Citations
45649
World Ranking
1363
National Ranking
686

Neal J. Cohen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal J. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 231 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neal J. Cohen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal J. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Neal J. Cohen is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research contributions focus predominantly on neuroscience and medicine, with particular attention to cognitive neuroscience and related subfields.

The primary areas of study in which they have published include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their subfield specializations involve:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Biochemistry

Their main research topics cover a range of subjects including:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling

Neal J. Cohen's recent publications illustrate the breadth of their scientific interests and the scope of their expertise. Some examples include:

  • Semantic Memory and the Hippocampus: Revisiting, Reaffirming, and Extending the Reach of Their Critical Relationship (2020), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain (2020), published in Human Brain Mapping
  • Mitigation of SARS-CoV-2 transmission at a large public university (2022), published in Nature Communications
  • Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Human Hippocampal Subfields: CA3-Dentate Gyrus Viscoelasticity Predicts Relational Memory Accuracy (2020), published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Relational Memory at Short and Long Delays in Individuals With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (2020), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Frequently appearing publication venues associated with their work include:

  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Nature Communications

Neal J. Cohen has collaborated extensively with a number of researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Hillary Schwarb
  • Charles H. Hillman
  • Arthur F. Kramer
  • Michael R. Dulas
  • Melissa C. Duff

In recognition of their contributions to the scientific community, Neal J. Cohen was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: the sequential learning problem

    Michael McCloskey;Neal J. Cohen

  • Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that

    Neal J. Cohen;Larry R. Squire;Larry R. Squire

  • Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system

    Neal J. Cohen;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging

    Stanley J. Colcombe;Arthur F. Kramer;Kirk I. Erickson;Paige Scalf

  • Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function.

    Arthur F. Kramer;Sowon Hahn;Neal J. Cohen;Marie T. Banich

  • From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection

    Howard Eichenbaum;Neal J. Cohen

  • Aerobic Fitness Reduces Brain Tissue Loss in Aging Humans

    Stanley J. Colcombe;Kirk I. Erickson;Naftali Raz;Andrew G. Webb

  • Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system

    Howard Eichenbaum;Tim Otto;Neal J. Cohen

  • The hippocampus—what does it do?

    Howard Eichenbaum;Tim Otto;Neal J. Cohen

  • Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding

    William M Kelley;Francis M Miezin;Kathleen B McDermott;Randy L Buckner

  • A neuroimaging investigation of the association between aerobic fitness, hippocampal volume, and memory performance in preadolescent children

    Laura Chaddock;Kirk I. Erickson;Ruchika Shaurya Prakash;Jennifer S. Kim

  • Attentional control in the aging brain: insights from an fMRI study of the stroop task.

    Michael P. Milham;Kirk I. Erickson;Marie T. Banich;Arthur F. Kramer

  • Can We Reconcile the Declarative Memory and Spatial Navigation Views on Hippocampal Function

    Howard Eichenbaum;Neal J. Cohen

  • The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.

    M.P Milham;M.T Banich;A Webb;V Barad

  • Amnesia is a Deficit in Relational Memory

    Jennifer D. Ryan;Robert R. Althoff;Stephen Whitlow;Neal J. Cohen

  • fMRI Studies of Stroop Tasks Reveal Unique Roles of Anterior and Posterior Brain Systems in Attentional Selection

    Marie T. Banich;Michael P. Milham;Ruthann Atchley;Neal J. Cohen

  • Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

    Robert R. Althoff;Neal J. Cohen

  • The Long and the Short of It: Relational Memory Impairments in Amnesia, Even at Short Lags

    Deborah E. Hannula;Daniel Tranel;Neal J. Cohen;Neal J. Cohen

  • Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: Summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies

    Neal J. Cohen;Jennifer Ryan;Caroline Hunt;Lorene Romine

  • The role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior.

    Rachael D Rubin;Patrick Dk Watson;Melissa C Duff;Neal J Cohen

  • Learning and memory

    Daniel L. Alkon;David G. Amaral;Mark F. Bear;Joel Black

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Charles H. Hillman
Charles H. Hillman Northeastern University
Howard Eichenbaum
Howard Eichenbaum Boston University
Daniel Tranel
Daniel Tranel University of Iowa
Melissa C. Duff
Melissa C. Duff Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Aron K. Barbey
Aron K. Barbey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Larry R. Squire
Larry R. Squire University of California, San Diego
Marie T. Banich
Marie T. Banich University of Colorado Boulder
Lauren B. Raine
Lauren B. Raine Northeastern University
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology offers diverse online study options, each leading to unique career opportunities. Pursuing online degrees for psychology can provide flexibility for students at all stages, whether starting a career or seeking advanced specialization.

Specialized pathways, such as the online forensic psychology masters psychology program, prepare graduates for roles in criminal justice, legal consulting, and mental health assessment within the legal system. Similarly, an online masters degree in organizational psychology supports careers helping businesses improve workplace dynamics, employee well-being, and organizational effectiveness.

For those aiming to become licensed clinical psychologists or practice at the highest level, the best psyd programs online offer doctoral-level training. These programs provide a blend of theoretical knowledge and practical skills necessary for clinical, counseling, or academic roles.

Online psychology programs can open doors to various sectors, but it is crucial to consider accreditation, state licensing requirements, and the program's alignment with your career goals. Exploring these pathways ensures you find an education best suited to your ambitions in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Neal J. Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles