World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
133
Citations
89784
World Ranking
146
National Ranking
89

Neuroscience

D-Index
133
Citations
90084
World Ranking
245
National Ranking
152

Daniel Tranel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Tranel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 464 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Tranel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Tranel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Daniel Tranel is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and specializes in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their research primarily focuses on Cognitive Neuroscience, with significant contributions to areas such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of main topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Recent publications by Daniel Tranel include:

  • Removal of high frequency contamination from motion estimates in single-band fMRI saves data without biasing functional connectivity, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Post-stroke outcomes predicted from multivariate lesion-behaviour and lesion network mapping, 2022, Brain
  • A human amygdala site that inhibits respiration and elicits apnea in pediatric epilepsy, 2020, JCI Insight
  • Latent disconnectome prediction of long-term cognitive-behavioural symptoms in stroke, 2023, Brain
  • Cognitive impairment after focal brain lesions is better predicted by damage to structural than functional network hubs, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Aaron D. Boes
  • Joel Bruss
  • Mark Bowren
  • Kenneth Manzel
  • Carolina Deifelt Streese

Daniel Tranel's work has been published most frequently in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Cortex
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Over their career, Daniel Tranel has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1993.

Best Publications

  • Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy

    Antoine Bechara;Hanna Damasio;Daniel Tranel;Antonio R. Damasio

  • Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala.

    R. Adolphs;D. Tranel;H. Damasio;H. Damasio;A. Damasio;A. Damasio

  • Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions.

    Antoine Bechara;Daniel Tranel;Hanna Damasio

  • Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex.

    Steven W. Anderson;Antoine Bechara;Hanna Damasio;Daniel Tranel

  • Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements

    Michael Koenigs;Liane Young;Ralph Adolphs;Ralph Adolphs;Daniel Tranel

  • Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans

    Antoine Bechara;Daniel Tranel;Hanna Damasio;Ralph Adolphs

  • A neural basis for lexical retrieval

    Hanna Damasio;Thomas J. Grabowski;Daniel Tranel;Richard D. Hichwa

  • The human amygdala in social judgment

    Ralph Adolphs;Daniel Tranel;Antonio R. Damasio;Antonio R. Damasio

  • A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage

    Ralph Adolphs;Ralph Adolphs;Frederic Gosselin;Tony W. Buchanan;Daniel Tranel

  • Fear and the human amygdala

    Ralph Adolphs;Daniel Tranel;Hanna Damasio;Antonio R. Damasio

  • Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making

    Ming Hsu;Meghana Bhatt;Meghana Bhatt;Ralph Adolphs;Ralph Adolphs;Daniel Tranel;Daniel Tranel

  • Failure to Respond Autonomically to Anticipated Future Outcomes Following Damage to Prefrontal Cortex

    Antoine Bechara;Daniel Tranel;Hanna Damasio;Antonio R. Damasio

  • Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli

    Antonio R. Damasio;Daniel Tranel;Hanna Damasio

  • A Role for Somatosensory Cortices in the Visual Recognition of Emotion as Revealed by Three-Dimensional Lesion Mapping

    Ralph Adolphs;Hanna Damasio;Hanna Damasio;Daniel Tranel;Greg Cooper

  • Dissociation Of Working Memory from Decision Making within the Human Prefrontal Cortex

    Antoine Bechara;Hanna Damasio;Daniel Tranel;Steven W. Anderson

  • Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage.

    R Adolphs;D Tranel;S Hamann;A.W Young

  • The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers.

    A. Bechara;H. Damasio;D. Tranel;A.R. Damasio

  • Cortical Systems for the Recognition of Emotion in Facial Expressions

    Ralph Adolphs;Hanna Damasio;Hanna Damasio;Daniel Tranel;Antonio R. Damasio;Antonio R. Damasio

  • Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance as a Measure of Frontal Lobe Damage

    Steven W. Anderson;Hanna Damasio;R. Dallas Jones;Daniel Tranel

  • Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems

    Antonio R. Damasio;Daniel Tranel

  • Neuropsychological assessment, 5th ed.

    Muriel Deutsch Lezak;Diane B. Howieson;Erin D. Bigler;Daniel Tranel

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Adolphs
Ralph Adolphs California Institute of Technology
Antonio R. Damasio
Antonio R. Damasio University of Southern California
Hanna Damasio
Hanna Damasio University of Southern California
Antoine Bechara
Antoine Bechara University of Southern California
Melissa C. Duff
Melissa C. Duff Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Natalie L. Denburg
Natalie L. Denburg University of Iowa
Neal J. Cohen
Neal J. Cohen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Steven W. Anderson
Steven W. Anderson University of Iowa
Thomas J. Grabowski
Thomas J. Grabowski University of Washington
David Rudrauf
David Rudrauf University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities, especially in the fast-growing field of substance abuse counseling. Many students choose flexible online programs to balance their studies with work or family commitments, making it easier to gain relevant skills from anywhere.

Requirements for substance abuse counselors can differ significantly depending on the city or state. For example, Seattle substance abuse counselor certification requirements focus on specific state-mandated credentials, while Spokane substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize academic coursework and supervised experience. If you are considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis, you'll need to meet both educational and practical requirements unique to Missouri. Similarly, St. Petersburg substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight different training standards set by Florida.

Researching region-specific qualifications is essential before choosing your degree or career pathway. With the right online education and an understanding of local regulations, you’ll be well-prepared for a rewarding role in mental health and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Tranel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles