World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
5470
World Ranking
7829
National Ranking
2777

Mark E. Hervig publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Hervig sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark E. Hervig D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Hervig sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Hervig is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their research spans several fields within physics and earth sciences, particularly focusing on atmospheric and space environments.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, Hervig's subfields of study emphasize:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Oceanography

The primary research topics Hervig has contributed to are:

  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements

Mark E. Hervig has published notable recent scientific papers, including:

  • "NRLMSIS 2.0: A Whole-Atmosphere Empirical Model of Temperature and Neutral Species Densities," 2020, Earth and Space Science
  • "NRLMSIS 2.1: An Empirical Model of Nitric Oxide Incorporated Into MSIS," 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "Trends in the polar summer mesosphere temperature and pressure altitude from satellite observations," 2021, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • "The Role of Vertically and Obliquely Propagating Gravity Waves in Influencing the Polar Summer Mesosphere," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Decadal and Annual Variations in Meteoric Flux From Ulysses, Wind, and SOFIE Observations," 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Frequently, Hervig has collaborated with researchers including:

  • S. M. Bailey
  • D. E. Siskind
  • B. Thurairajah
  • J. M. C. Plane
  • Wuhu Feng

Hervig's work is commonly featured in publication venues such as:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Earth and Space Science
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Best Publications

  • NRLMSIS 2.0: A Whole-Atmosphere Empirical Model of Temperature and Neutral Species Densities

    J. T. Emmert;D. P. Drob;J. M. Picone;D. E. Siskind

  • Thirty years of in situ stratospheric aerosol size distribution measurements from Laramie, Wyoming (41°N), using balloon-borne instruments

    T. Deshler;M. E. Hervig;D. J. Hofmann;J. M. Rosen

  • First confirmation that water ice is the primary component of polar mesospheric clouds

    Mark Hervig;Robert E. Thompson;Martin McHugh;Larry L. Gordley

  • The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) mission: Overview and early science results

    James M. Russell;Scott M. Bailey;Larry L. Gordley;David W. Rusch

  • The solar occultation for ice experiment

    Larry L. Gordley;Mark E. Hervig;Chad Fish;James M. Russell

  • High-altitude data assimilation system experiments for the northern summer mesosphere season of 2007

    Stephen D. Eckermann;Karl W. Hoppel;Lawrence Coy;John P. McCormack

  • Decadal and inter-hemispheric variability in polar mesospheric clouds, water vapor, and temperature

    Mark Hervig;Dave Siskind

  • Interpretation of SOFIE PMC measurements: Cloud identification and derivation of mass density, particle shape, and particle size

    Mark E. Hervig;Larry L. Gordley;Michael H. Stevens;James M. Russell

  • First Satellite Observations of Meteoric Smoke in the Middle Atmosphere

    Mark E. Hervig;Larry L. Gordley;Lance E. Deaver;David E. Siskind

  • The content and composition of meteoric smoke in mesospheric ice particles from SOFIE observations

    Mark E. Hervig;Lance E. Deaver;Charles G. Bardeen;James M. Russell

  • Relationships between polar mesospheric clouds, temperature, and water vapor from Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment (SOFIE) observations

    Mark E. Hervig;Michael H. Stevens;Larry L. Gordley;Lance E. Deaver

  • Validation of temperature measurements from the Halogen Occultation Experiment

    M. E. Hervig;J. M. Russell;L. L. Gordley;S. R. Drayson

  • Satellite observations of ozone in the upper mesosphere

    A. K. Smith;V. L. Harvey;Martin G. Mlynczak;B. Funke

  • Numerical simulations of the three‐dimensional distribution of polar mesospheric clouds and comparisons with Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) experiment and the Solar Occultation For Ice Experiment (SOFIE) observations

    C. G. Bardeen;C. G. Bardeen;O. B. Toon;E. J. Jensen;M. E. Hervig

  • Aerosol effects and corrections in the Halogen Occultation Experiment

    Mark E. Hervig;James M. Russell;Larry L. Gordley;John Daniels

  • NRLMSIS 2.1: An Empirical Model of Nitric Oxide Incorporated Into MSIS

    Unknown

  • Tidally induced variations of polar mesospheric cloud altitudes and ice water content using a data assimilation system

    Michael H. Stevens;David E. Siskind;Stephen D. Eckermann;Lawrence Coy

  • Water vapor enhancement in the polar summer mesosphere and its relationship to polar mesospheric clouds

    Mark Hervig;Marty McHugh;Michael E. Summers

  • Decadal variability in PMCs and implications for changing temperature and water vapor in the upper mesosphere

    Mark E. Hervig;Uwe Berger;David E. Siskind

  • Evaluation of aerosol measurements from SAGE II, HALOE, and balloonborne optical particle counters

    Mark Hervig;Terry Deshler

  • Mass analysis of charged aerosol particles in NLC and PMSE during the ECOMA/MASS campaign

    Scott Robertson;Mihály Horányi;Scott Knappmiller;Zoltan Sternovsky

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Russell
James M. Russell Brown University
Larry L. Gordley
Larry L. Gordley Langley Research Center
Scott M. Bailey
Scott M. Bailey Virginia Tech
David E. Siskind
David E. Siskind United States Naval Research Laboratory
Cora E. Randall
Cora E. Randall University of Colorado Boulder
Gary E. Thomas
Gary E. Thomas University of Colorado Boulder
Terry Deshler
Terry Deshler University of Wyoming
Daniel R. Marsh
Daniel R. Marsh National Center for Atmospheric Research
Kaley A. Walker
Kaley A. Walker University of Toronto
Karl W. Hoppel
Karl W. Hoppel United States Naval Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many accredited programs offer flexible learning options that balance quality and convenience. For those aiming to advance in education leadership or research, accredited eds to edd programs provide a strong academic foundation with robust online platforms.

Career paths in environmental policy or social work also benefit from specialized degrees. The cheapest dsw program allows students to gain expertise in social issues related to the environment without a hefty price tag, making it an accessible choice for many.

Additionally, some may prefer a broad academic base before specializing. The budget friendly online general studies degree offers a well-rounded education that supports diverse job roles in environmental fields while remaining affordable.

For those new to higher education or seeking a quick pathway, one of the easiest bachelor degree to get can be a stepping stone into environmental careers, providing essential knowledge without overwhelming complexity.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Hervig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles