World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
10684
World Ranking
3140
National Ranking
1216

Gary E. Thomas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary E. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 200 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gary E. Thomas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary E. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary E. Thomas is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Physics and Astronomy, Environmental Science, and Earth and Planetary Sciences, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to complex scientific questions.

The main subfields of study associated with Gary E. Thomas include Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Mathematical Physics. These areas suggest a broad engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of natural sciences.

The scientist's work encompasses several key topics, such as Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Climate variability and models, Nonlinear Waves and Solitons, and Nonlinear Photonic Systems. This diverse range illustrates a focus on atmospheric processes, climate interactions, and nonlinear physical phenomena.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Gary E. Thomas include:

  • Modeling Responses of Polar Mesospheric Clouds to Gravity Wave and Instability Dynamics and Induced Large-Scale Motions, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Assimilation of Ground-Based Microwave Radiometer Temperature Observations Into a Convective-Scale NWP Model for Fog Forecast Improvement, 2024, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
  • Bright and dark sinks-type solitons for the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation in polynomial potential in the presence of external source, 2024, The European Physical Journal Plus

Gary E. Thomas has collaborated frequently with colleagues including Wenjun Dong, David C. Fritts, Thomas Lund, Pauline Martinet, and Pierre Brousseau. This network of coauthors reflects a multidisciplinary team working on atmospheric and physical sciences topics.

Publication venues where Gary E. Thomas has contributed are:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
  • The European Physical Journal Plus

The variety of journals indicates engagement with both specialized atmospheric research communities and broader physical sciences audiences. The research outputs demonstrate a balance between empirical studies and theoretical modeling, supporting a comprehensive view of natural phenomena.

Best Publications

  • Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean

    Gary E. Thomas;Knut Stamnes

  • Mesospheric clouds and the physics of the mesopause region

    Gary E. Thomas

  • Modeling the microphysics of mesospheric ice particles: Assessment of current capabilities and basic sensitivities

    Markus Rapp;Gary E. Thomas

  • Relation between increasing methane and the presence of ice clouds at the mesopause

    Gary E. Thomas;John J. Olivero;Eric J. Jensen;Wilfred Schroeder

  • Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean: List of Illustrations

    Gary E. Thomas;Knut Stamnes

  • The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) mission: Overview and early science results

    James M. Russell;Scott M. Bailey;Larry L. Gordley;David W. Rusch

  • The Interstellar Wind and its Influence on the Interplanetary Environment

    Unknown

  • Small‐scale temperature variations in the vicinity of NLC: Experimental and model results

    M. Rapp;F.-J. Lübken;A. Müllemann;G. E. Thomas

  • Solar backscattered ultraviolet (SBUV) observations of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) over two solar cycles

    Matthew T. DeLand;Eric P. Shettle;Gary E. Thomas;John J. Olivero

  • Solar cycle study of interplanetary Lyman-alpha variations: Pioneer venus orbiter sky background results

    J. M. Ajello;A. I. Stewart;G. E. Thomas;A. Graps

  • A quarter-century of satellite polar mesospheric cloud observations

    Matthew T. DeLand;Eric P. Shettle;Gary E. Thomas;John J. Olivero

  • Mariner 6: ultraviolet spectrum of Mars upper atmosphere.

    C. A. Barth;W. G. Fastie;C. W. Hord;J. B. Pearce

  • Is the polar mesosphere the miner's canary of global change?

    G.E. Thomas

  • A growth‐sedimentation model of polar mesospheric clouds: Comparison with SME measurements

    Eric Jensen;Gary E. Thomas

  • On the mean particle size and water content of polar mesospheric clouds

    Gary E. Thomas;Christopher P. McKay

  • Climatology of Polar Mesospheric Clouds

    John J. Olivero;Gary E. Thomas

  • Latitude‐dependent long‐term variations in polar mesospheric clouds from SBUV version 3 PMC data

    Matthew T. DeLand;Eric P. Shettle;Gary E. Thomas;John J. Olivero

  • Wave breaking signatures in noctilucent clouds

    David C. Fritts;Joseph R. Isler;Gary E. Thomas;Øyvind Andreassen

  • Global change in the mesosphere-lower thermosphere region: has it already arrived?

    G.E. Thomas

  • Noctilucent clouds as possible indicators of global change in the mesosphere

    G.E. Thomas;J. Olivero

  • Small Scale Temperature Variations in the Vicinity of NLC: Experimental and Model Results

    M. Rapp;F. Luebken;A. Muellemann;G. E. Thomas

  • Solar backscattered ultraviolet (SBUV) observations of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCS) over two solar cycles : Layered Phenomenoa in the mesopause region (LPMR)

    Matthew T. Deland;Eric P. Shettle;Gary E. Thomas;John J. Olivero

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott M. Bailey
Scott M. Bailey Virginia Tech
James M. Russell
James M. Russell Brown University
Cora E. Randall
Cora E. Randall University of Colorado Boulder
Knut Stamnes
Knut Stamnes Stevens Institute of Technology
David W. Rusch
David W. Rusch University of Colorado Boulder
William E. McClintock
William E. McClintock University of Colorado Boulder
Matthew T. DeLand
Matthew T. DeLand Science Systems and Applications (United States)
Charles A. Barth
Charles A. Barth University of Colorado Boulder
Mark E. Hervig
Mark E. Hervig University of Wyoming
Scott Palo
Scott Palo University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but many students also consider complementary degrees to broaden their expertise. For those seeking cost-effective options, exploring affordable online general studies degree programs can provide flexibility and foundational knowledge that supports environmental careers without heavy financial burdens.

Some learners prefer a smoother academic journey and may be interested in the easiest bachelor's degree to get while still aligning their studies with environmental interests. This can help maintain motivation and ensure successful degree completion.

Specific technical skills are also highly valued in the environmental field. For example, a geology degree online can deepen your understanding of Earth's processes, which is crucial for roles in environmental consulting or resource management.

Similarly, expertise in geospatial data is increasingly important. Choosing from the best GIS programs in the US can equip you with skills to analyze spatial data, which is vital for environmental planning and conservation initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Gary E. Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles