World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
7107
World Ranking
4834
National Ranking
1776

David W. Rusch publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Rusch sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

David W. Rusch D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Rusch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Rusch is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on physics, astronomy, and chemistry, with a strong interdisciplinary approach that encompasses both physical sciences and chemical processes.

The main fields of study for David W. Rusch include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Chemistry

Within these disciplines, their work delves into specific subfields such as:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Oceanography

The topics covered by their research reveal a blend of space sciences and chemical studies, including:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

David W. Rusch has contributed to several publications. Among their recent papers are:

  • Variations of Lower Thermospheric FUV Emissions Based on GOLD Observations and GLOW Modeling, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Unveiling the multifunctionality of aroma molecules as co-surfactants and hydrotropes in miniemulsion copolymerization, 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • K. Greer
  • R. Eastes
  • S. C. Solomon
  • W. E. McClintock
  • A. G. Burns

David W. Rusch has published in notable academic venues such as:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • The effect of particle precipitation events on the neutral and ion chemistry of the middle atmosphere: II. Odd hydrogen

    D. W. Rusch;Jean-Claude Gérard;S. Solomon;P. J. Crutzen

  • NOx Production in Lightning

    W. L. Chameides;D. H. Stedman;R. R. Dickerson;D. W. Rusch

  • The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) mission: Overview and early science results

    James M. Russell;Scott M. Bailey;Larry L. Gordley;David W. Rusch

  • A numerical response of the middle atmosphere to the 11-year solar cycle

    Rolando R. Garcia;Susan Solomon;Raymond G. Roble;David W. Rusch

  • Solar Mesosphere Explorer Near-Infrared Spectrometer: Measurements of 1.27-μm radiances and the inference of mesospheric ozone

    Ronald J. Thomas;Charles A. Barth;David W. Rusch;Ryan W. Sanders

  • On the chemistry of metastable atomic nitrogen in the F region deduced from Simultaneous satellite measurements of the 5200‐Å airglow and atmospheric composition

    J. E. Frederick;D. W. Rusch

  • Climatology and trends of mesospheric (58–90 km) temperatures based upon 1982–1986 SME Limb scattering profiles

    R. Todd Clancy;David W. Rusch

  • Morphology of the Venus ultraviolet night airglow

    A. I. F. Stewart;Jean-Claude Gérard;D. W. Rusch;S. W. Bougher

  • The O I (6300 Å) airglow

    P. B. Hays;D. W. Rusch;R. G. Roble;J. C. G. Walker

  • Satellite measurements of nitric oxide in the polar region

    D. W. Rusch;C. A. Barth

  • Mesospheric ozone depletion during the Solar Proton Event of July 13, 1982 Part II. Comparison between theory and measurements

    S. Solomon;G. C. Reid;D. W. Rusch;R. J. Thomas

  • Temperature minima in the average thermal structure of the middle mesosphere (70–80 km) from analysis of 40‐ to 92‐km SME global temperature profiles

    R. Todd Clancy;David W. Rusch;Michael T. Callan

  • The O II (7319–7330 Å) dayglow

    D. W. Rusch;D. G. Torr;P. B. Hays;J. C. G. Walker

  • Satellite ultraviolet measurements of nitric oxide fluorescence with a diffusive transport model

    David W. Rusch

  • Solar Mesosphere Explorer: Scientific objectives and results

    C. A. Barth;D. W. Rusch;R. J. Thomas;G. H. Mount

  • Polar mesospheric cloud structures observed from the cloud imaging and particle size experiment on the Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere spacecraft: Atmospheric gravity waves as drivers for longitudinal variability in polar mesospheric cloud occurrence

    A. Chandran;D. W. Rusch;A. W. Merkel;S. E. Palo

  • Solar Mesosphere Explorer Ultraviolet Spectrometer: Measurements of ozone in the 1.0–0.1 mbar region

    David W. Rusch;George H. Mount;Charles A. Barth;Ronald J. Thomas

  • POAM II retrieval algorithm and error analysis

    J. D. Lumpe;R. M. Bevilacqua;K. W. Hoppel;S. S. Krigman

  • Measurements of stratospheric NO2 from the Solar Mesosphere Explorer satellite: 1. An overview of the results

    George H. Mount;David W. Rusch;John F. Noxon;Joseph M. Zawodny

  • The Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement instrument

    W. Glaccum;R. L. Lucke;R. M. Bevilacqua;E. P. Shettle

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary E. Thomas
Gary E. Thomas University of Colorado Boulder
Ronald J. Thomas
Ronald J. Thomas New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Charles A. Barth
Charles A. Barth University of Colorado Boulder
Cora E. Randall
Cora E. Randall University of Colorado Boulder
R. Todd Clancy
R. Todd Clancy Space Science Institute
Gary J. Rottman
Gary J. Rottman University of Colorado Boulder
Paul B. Hays
Paul B. Hays University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William E. McClintock
William E. McClintock University of Colorado Boulder
Scott M. Bailey
Scott M. Bailey Virginia Tech
James M. Russell
James M. Russell Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can broaden career prospects. Many start with an online general studies degree affordable program, which offers flexibility and foundational skills suitable for various environmental roles.

Those seeking a quicker path may consider some of the easiest bachelor degree to get that still build critical thinking and scientific knowledge relevant to environmental fields.

Specialized studies such as geology are integral to understanding earth processes. Enrolling in the best online geology degree programs equips students with essential skills for careers in natural resource management, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Geospatial technologies also play a key role in environmental monitoring. Pursuing one of the best GIS undergraduate programs prepares graduates to analyze spatial data and contribute to sustainable planning and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Rusch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles