World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 42 2991 2722 218 197 89 41025

Hitoshi Nakatogawa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hitoshi Nakatogawa between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hitoshi Nakatogawa published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2020. 5 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2020. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hitoshi Nakatogawa: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 7
2009 1
2010 3
2011 2
2012 8
2013 4
2014 6
2015 7
2016 7
2017 4
2018 6
2019 4
2020 9
2021 3
2022 3
2023 9
2024 5
2025 3
2026 2
Total 108
Download as CSV

Hitoshi Nakatogawa publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hitoshi Nakatogawa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 89 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125 89
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Hitoshi Nakatogawa D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hitoshi Nakatogawa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101 42
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Hitoshi Nakatogawa is a researcher affiliated with the Tokyo Institute of Technology in Japan. Their work primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant focus also on medicine. Within these broader disciplines, their research involves epidemiology, cell biology, molecular biology, physiology, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Their main research topics emphasize autophagy in disease and therapy, cellular transport and secretion, endoplasmic reticulum stress and disease, nuclear structure and function, mosquito-borne diseases and control, Toxoplasma gondii research, and RNA interference and gene delivery.

Notable recent publications by Nakatogawa include:

  • Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis, 2020, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
  • Atg9 is a lipid scramblase that mediates autophagosomal membrane expansion, 2020, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • ER -phagy: selective autophagy of the endoplasmic reticulum, 2022, EMBO Reports
  • Membrane perturbation by lipidated Atg8 underlies autophagosome biogenesis, 2021, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • Atg8 family proteins, LIR/AIM motifs and other interaction modes, 2023, Autophagy Reports

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nakatogawa are Tetsuya Kotani, Nobuo N. Noda, Hiromi Kirisako, Keisuke Mochida, and Chika Kakuta.

Their work is often published in established academic venues, with repeated publications in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, The Journal of Cell Biology, Nature Communications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Autophagy.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Kuninori Suzuki;Yoshiaki Kamada;Yoshinori Ohsumi

  • Atg8, a Ubiquitin-like Protein Required for Autophagosome Formation, Mediates Membrane Tethering and Hemifusion

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Yoshinobu Ichimura;Yoshinori Ohsumi

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus

    Keisuke Mochida;Yu Oikawa;Yayoi Kimura;Hiromi Kirisako

  • Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis.

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa

  • The Ribosomal Exit Tunnel Functions as a Discriminating Gate

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Koreaki Ito

  • Structural basis of target recognition by Atg8/LC3 during selective autophagy.

    Nobuo N. Noda;Hiroyuki Kumeta;Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Kenji Satoo

  • Atg9 is a lipid scramblase that mediates autophagosomal membrane expansion

    Kazuaki Matoba;Tetsuya Kotani;Akihisa Tsutsumi;Takuma Tsuji

  • Atg2 mediates direct lipid transfer between membranes for autophagosome formation.

    Takuo Osawa;Tetsuya Kotani;Tatsuya Kawaoka;Eri Hirata

  • Two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems that mediate membrane formation during autophagy

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa

  • The Atg2-Atg18 complex tethers pre-autophagosomal membranes to the endoplasmic reticulum for autophagosome formation

    Tetsuya Kotani;Hiromi Kirisako;Michiko Koizumi;Yoshinori Ohsumi

  • Recruitment of the autophagic machinery to endosomes during infection is mediated by ubiquitin

    Naonobu Fujita;Eiji Morita;Takashi Itoh;Atsushi Tanaka

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Atg4 recycles inappropriately lipidated Atg8 to promote autophagosome biogenesis

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Junko Ishii;Eri Asai;Yoshinori Ohsumi

  • Secretion Monitor, SecM, Undergoes Self-Translation Arrest in the Cytosol

    Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Koreaki Ito

  • Genetically Encoded but Nonpolypeptide Prolyl-tRNA Functions in the A Site for SecM-Mediated Ribosomal Stall

    Hiroki Muto;Hitoshi Nakatogawa;Koreaki Ito

  • Structural basis of Atg8 activation by a homodimeric E1, Atg7.

    Nobuo N. Noda;Kenji Satoo;Yuko Fujioka;Hiroyuki Kumeta

Frequent Co-Authors

Yoshinori Ohsumi
Yoshinori Ohsumi Tokyo Institute of Technology
Koreaki Ito
Koreaki Ito Kyoto Sangyo University
Fuyuhiko Inagaki
Fuyuhiko Inagaki Hokkaido University
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Boris Zhivotovsky
Boris Zhivotovsky Karolinska Institute
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Felix Randow
Felix Randow MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Steven Finkbeiner
Steven Finkbeiner University of California, San Francisco
Philippe Pierre
Philippe Pierre Aix-Marseille University
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in broadening your career opportunities beyond traditional Molecular Biology roles? There are several related online graduate programs that can help you develop specialized skills and explore diverse industries.

For those considering the human and social side of science, pursuing one of the best online msw programs opens doors to meaningful work supporting individuals and communities. If you're fascinated by human behavior and mental processes, an online masters in psychology offers a fast-track to understanding the mind—valuable in clinical, research, or corporate settings.

Combining biology and psychological practice, a online masters in mental health counseling prepares you for direct client work and therapeutic interventions, often integrating knowledge about the biological roots of mental health. Alternatively, exploring high paying jobs in forensic psychology enables you to apply biological science within legal contexts, such as criminal investigations and the justice system.

These online programs offer flexibility for working professionals and can be tailored to your scientific background, making it easier to transition into new and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Hitoshi Nakatogawa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles