World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
32763
World Ranking
9696
National Ranking
384

Robert Teasell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Teasell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 444 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert Teasell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Teasell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Teasell is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has a significant body of research primarily in the field of medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including rehabilitation, epidemiology, neurology, emergency medicine, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics of their research cover various aspects of neurological conditions and recovery, with a focus on:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Teasell's recent publications include:

  • Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th Edition Update 2019, 2020, International Journal of Stroke
  • Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part Two: Transitions and Community Participation Following Stroke, 2020, International Journal of Stroke
  • INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV: Cognitive-Communication and Social Cognition Disorders, 2023, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part III: Executive Functions, 2023, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Exoskeleton for post-stroke recovery of ambulation (ExStRA): study protocol for a mixed-methods study investigating the efficacy and acceptance of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program during stroke inpatient rehabilitation, 2020, BMC Neurology

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Mark Bayley
  • Amanda McIntyre
  • Swati Mehta
  • Shannon Janzen
  • Amber Harnett

Robert Teasell has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Dysphagia After Stroke Incidence, Diagnosis, and Pulmonary Complications

    Rosemary Martino;Norine Foley;Sanjit Bhogal;Nicholas Diamant

  • Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery

    Sanjit K. Bhogal;Robert Teasell;Mark Speechley

  • Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Using Wii Gaming Technology in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial and Proof of Principle

    Gustavo Saposnik;Robert Teasell;Muhammad Mamdani;Judith Hall

  • Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury

    Robert W. Teasell;J.Malcolm O. Arnold;Andrei Krassioukov;Gail A. Delaney

  • Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015

    Debbie Hebert;M Patrice Lindsay;M Patrice Lindsay;Amanda McIntyre;Adam Kirton

  • The Role of Task-Specific Training in Rehabilitation Therapies

    Nestor A. Bayona;Jamie Bitensky;Katherine Salter;Robert Teasell

  • Stroke: Working toward a prioritized world agenda

    Vladimir Hachinski;Geoffrey A. Donnan;Philip B. Gorelick;Werner Hacke

  • Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain.

    David M Walton;Joy C Macdermid;Warren Nielson;Robert W Teasell

  • Lesion Location and Poststroke Depression: Systematic Review of the Methodological Limitations in the Literature

    Sanjit K. Bhogal;Robert Teasell;Norine Foley;Mark Speechley

  • A systematic review of the management of autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury.

    Andrei Krassioukov;Darren E. Warburton;Robert Teasell;Janice J. Eng

  • An Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation

    Robert W. Teasell;Norine C. Foley;Sanjit K. Bhogal;Mark R. Speechley

  • The Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST): development and validation of a dysphagia screening tool for patients with stroke.

    Rosemary Martino;Frank L. Silver;Robert Teasell;Mark Bayley

  • Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial

    Gustavo Saposnik;Gustavo Saposnik;Leonardo G Cohen;Muhammad Mamdani;Sepideth Pooyania

  • Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: Prevalence and predictors

    Hillel M. Finestone;Linda S. Greene-Finestone;Elizabeth S. Wilson;Robert W. Teasell

  • A review of the relationship between dysphagia and malnutrition following stroke.

    Norine C Foley;Ruth E Martin;Katherine L Salter;Robert W Teasell

  • The incidence and consequences of falls in stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation: Factors associated with high risk

    Robert Teasell;Marc McRae;Norine Foley;Asha Bhardwaj

  • The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

    Katherine Salter;Chelsea Hellings;Norine Foley;Robert Teasell

  • Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review: Methodology

    Norine C. Foley;Robert W. Teasell;Sanjit K. Bhogal;Mark R. Speechley

  • Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 1: Musculoskeletal and cardiovascular complications.

    D K Dittmer;R Teasell

  • Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation.

    K Salter;JW Jutai;R Teasell;NC Foley

Frequent Co-Authors

Janice J. Eng
Janice J. Eng University of British Columbia
Janet E. Pope
Janet E. Pope University of Western Ontario
Joy C. MacDermid
Joy C. MacDermid University of Western Ontario
Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Nanna B. Finnerup
Nanna B. Finnerup Aarhus University
Eva Widerström-Noga
Eva Widerström-Noga University of Miami
Lalit Kalra
Lalit Kalra King's College London
Gustavo Saposnik
Gustavo Saposnik University of Toronto
Philip J. Siddall
Philip J. Siddall University of Sydney
Leonardo G. Cohen
Leonardo G. Cohen National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of related fields and online degree options. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, pursuing a health administration degree can lead to roles in hospital management, clinic operations, and healthcare leadership. These programs are designed to fast-track students into essential, non-clinical positions in the health sector.

Nurses looking to advance their qualifications may consider adn to msn bridge programs. These programs offer a streamlined pathway from an associate degree in nursing to a Master of Science in Nursing, unlocking opportunities in advanced practice or leadership.

Nutrition also plays a key role in preventive medicine. Students can prepare for careers as dietitians or wellness coaches by enrolling in an online bachelor's degree in nutrition. These programs combine science and health, equipping graduates for diverse job prospects in both clinical and community settings.

For advancing into top-level management, many choose cahme accredited online mha programs list to find fully accredited health administration programs. These degrees are highly valued by employers and help graduates stand out in the competitive healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Teasell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles