World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 78 1607 1439 75 71 382 17604
Neuroscience 79 1713 1560 41 38 390 17752

Linda Worrall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Worrall between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Worrall published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2013. 7 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2013. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Worrall: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 3
1996 9
1997 3
1998 6
1999 10
2000 17
2001 12
2002 6
2003 13
2004 24
2005 9
2006 14
2007 13
2008 26
2009 11
2010 21
2011 24
2012 25
2013 27
2014 23
2015 20
2016 11
2017 13
2018 21
2019 21
2020 9
2021 10
2022 9
2023 3
2024 2
2025 5
Total 425
Download as CSV

Linda Worrall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Worrall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 382 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 382
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Worrall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Worrall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 78
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda Worrall is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their publications emphasize topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and the use of the Delphi technique in research.

Their recent academic papers include the following:

  • Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers (2020, Aphasiology)
  • Friendship matters: a research agenda for aphasia (2021, Aphasiology)
  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing stepped psychological care for people with aphasia: Perspectives of stroke health professionals (2020, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation)
  • Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis (2022, International Journal of Stroke)
  • Many ways of measuring: a scoping review of measurement instruments for use with people with aphasia (2020, Aphasiology)

Worrall's work spans several subfields of study including cognitive neuroscience, rehabilitation, general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

The following are frequent publication venues where Linda Worrall has published multiple works:

  • Aphasiology
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)

Collaborations have been an important aspect of Worrall's research, with frequent co-authors including Nina Simmons-Mackie, Miranda L. Rose, Sarah J. Wallace, Brooke Ryan, and Marian Brady.

The research topics commonly addressed by Worrall include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

This overview highlights Linda Worrall's multidisciplinary contributions at the intersection of language, rehabilitation, and cognitive health, with a focus on aphasia and stroke-related conditions.

Best Publications

  • What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF

    Linda Worrall;Sue Sherratt;Penny Rogers;Tami Howe

  • Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals.

    Tammy Hoffmann;Linda Worrall

  • Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: Social and emotional health, and psychological well-being

    Madeline Cruice;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson;Robert Murison

  • Social Participation for Older People with Aphasia: The Impact of Communication Disability on Friendships

    Bronwyn Davidson;Tami Howe;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson

  • A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment

    Louise Hickson;Linda Worrall;Nerina Scarinci

  • Quantifying aphasic people's social lives in the context of non‐aphasic peers

    Madeline Cruice;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson

  • A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation

    Felicity A S Bright;Nicola M Kayes;Linda Worrall;Kathryn M McPherson

  • Clinical Supervision in Four Mental Health Professions: A Review of the Evidence

    Susan H. Spence;Jill Wilson;David J. Kavanagh;Jenny Strong

  • Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • The effect of hearing impairment in older people on the spouse

    Nerina Scarinci;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson

  • Nursing the patient with complex communication needs: time as a barrier and a facilitator to successful communication in hospital

    Bronwyn Hemsley;Susan Balandin;Linda Worrall

  • Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions

    Miranda Rose;Alison Ferguson;Emma Power;Leanne Togher

  • Aphasia friendly written health information: content and design characteristics.

    Tanya A. Rose;Linda E. Worrall;Louise M. Hickson;Tammy C. Hoffmann

  • Living successfully with aphasia: a qualitative meta-analysis of the perspectives of individuals with aphasia, family members, and speech-language pathologists.

    Kyla Brown;Linda E Worrall;Bronwyn Davidson;Tami Howe

  • A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement:

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia

    Caroline Baker;Linda Worrall;Miranda Rose;Kyla Hudson

  • Factors influencing rehabilitation decisions of adults with acquired hearing impairment

    Ariane Laplante-Lévesque;Louise Hickson;Linda Worrall

  • The effectiveness of aphasia‐friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke

    Tanya A. Rose;Linda E. Worrall;Kryss T. McKenna

  • Interviews with people with aphasia: Environmental factors that influence their community participation

    Tami J. Howe;Linda E. Worrall;Louise M. H. Hickson

  • Feeding problems in infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a controlled study

    B. Mathisen;L. E. Worrall;J. Masel;C. Wall

  • Identifying the communication activities of older people with aphasia: Evidence from naturalistic observation

    Bronwyn Davidson;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson

Frequent Co-Authors

Louise Hickson
Louise Hickson University of Queensland
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Nina Simmons-Mackie
Nina Simmons-Mackie Southeastern Louisiana University
Jennifer Fleming
Jennifer Fleming University of Queensland
Leanne Togher
Leanne Togher University of Sydney
Jenny Strong
Jenny Strong University of Queensland
David A. Copland
David A. Copland University of Queensland
David J. Kavanagh
David J. Kavanagh Queensland University of Technology
Susan H. Spence
Susan H. Spence Griffith University
Leora R. Cherney
Leora R. Cherney Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens up a range of online degree programs that lead to rewarding careers in mental health. Many students choose online bachelor’s or master’s degrees in psychology, counseling, or related fields. These flexible options make it easier to balance education with work or family commitments.

For those interested in counseling, each state has specific requirements. If you’re curious about how to become a mental health counselor in Bakersfield, for example, you’ll find that California has unique licensing steps. Similarly, Baltimore mental health counselor education requirements include supervised clinical experience and state exams.

States like Idaho and Massachusetts have their own standards, too. It’s helpful to research how to become a mental health counselor in Boise or understand the Boston mental health counselor certification requirements for a smooth career path.

No matter where you study, online psychology degrees offer specialized tracks and prepare graduates for licensure and a meaningful career helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Worrall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles