World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5678 5273 328 320 276 9610

Leanne Togher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leanne Togher between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leanne Togher published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2016. 19 of the 332 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2016. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 12 publications
1995 2025

332 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leanne Togher: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 4
2006 10
2007 5
2008 13
2009 16
2010 14
2011 14
2012 13
2013 23
2014 14
2015 11
2016 29
2017 20
2018 12
2019 21
2020 18
2021 20
2022 17
2023 21
2024 7
2025 12
Total 332
Download as CSV

Leanne Togher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne Togher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 276 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 276
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Leanne Togher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne Togher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leanne Togher is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and is primarily engaged in research within the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans various subfields, including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Rehabilitation.

The main topics in which Togher specializes include Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare, Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances.

Togher's recent publications include:

  • INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV: Cognitive-Communication and Social Cognition Disorders (2023, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation)
  • Recommendations for the Design and Implementation of Virtual Reality for Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Systematic Review (2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods, Overview, and Principles (2023, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation)
  • Digitally enabled aged care and neurological rehabilitation to enhance outcomes with Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) in Australia: A randomised controlled trial (2020, PLoS Medicine)
  • Improved Conversation Outcomes After Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Communication Partners: A Clinical Trial Investigating In-Person and Telehealth Delivery (2020, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Togher include:

  • Emma Power (33 publications)
  • Rachael Rietdijk (22 publications)
  • Melissa Brunner (21 publications)
  • Elise Elbourn (10 publications)
  • Miranda L. Rose (9 publications)

Togher's work has been published repeatedly in key venues relevant to speech-language pathology and brain injury rehabilitation. These venues include:

  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (12 publications)
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (10 publications)
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (8 publications)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (6 publications)
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement†

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;William Shadish

  • Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale

    Robyn L Tate;Skye McDonald;Michael Perdices;Leanne Togher

  • Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale

    Robyn L Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;Donna Wakim

  • Social Participation for Older People with Aphasia: The Impact of Communication Disability on Friendships

    Bronwyn Davidson;Tami Howe;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;Skye McDonald

  • INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication.

    Leanne Togher;Catherine Wiseman-Hakes;Jacinta M Douglas;Mary Stergiou-Kita

  • Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions

    Miranda Rose;Alison Ferguson;Emma Power;Leanne Togher

  • Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: a multicenter trial.

    Skye McDonald;Robyn Tate;Leanne Togher;Cristina Bornhofen

  • Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism

    David Trembath;Susan Balandin;Leanne Togher;Roger J. Stancliffe

  • Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial

    Leanne Togher;Skye McDonald;Chris Code;Susan Grant

  • Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners

    L Togher;L Hand;C Code

  • INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part II: attention and information processing speed.

    Jennie Louise Ponsford;Mark Theodore Bayley;Catherine Wiseman-Hakes;Leanne Togher

  • Training secondary school teachers in instructional language modification techniques to support adolescents with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial.

    Julia Starling;Natalie Munro;Leanne Togher;Joanne Arciuli

  • Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial.

    Leanne Togher;Skye McDonald;Robyn Tate;Emma Power

  • Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial

    Leanne Hassett;Maayken van den Berg;Richard I. Lindley;Maria Crotty

  • The design, conduct and report of single-case research: resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature.

    Robyn L Tate;Michael Perdices;Skye McDonald;Leanne Togher

  • Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales

    Leanne Togher;Emma Power;Robyn Tate;Skye McDonald

  • Return of Voice for Ventilated Tracheostomy Patients in ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early-Targeted Intervention.

    Amy L. Freeman-Sanderson;Leanne Togher;Mark R. Elkins;Paul R. Phipps

  • Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury

    Skye McDonald;Chris Code;Leanne Togher

  • Social and Communication Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury

    Skye McDonald;Leanne Togher;Chris Code

  • Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication.

    David Trembath;Susan Balandin;Leanne Togher

Frequent Co-Authors

Skye McDonald
Skye McDonald University of New South Wales
Robyn L. Tate
Robyn L. Tate University of Sydney
Susan Balandin
Susan Balandin Deakin University
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Chris Code
Chris Code University of Exeter
Jacinta Douglas
Jacinta Douglas La Trobe University
Linda Worrall
Linda Worrall University of Queensland
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Tamara Ownsworth
Tamara Ownsworth Griffith University
Roger J. Stancliffe
Roger J. Stancliffe University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to diverse and impactful career paths. One of the fastest-growing areas is substance abuse counseling, which requires specialized knowledge and compassion. Requirements, certifications, and licensing standards can vary from city to city, so it’s important to understand what’s needed for your region.

For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis will need to meet specific education and supervised experience criteria. If you are considering a move to Florida, you should review what's required for how to become a substance abuse counselor in St. Petersburg or learn more about substance abuse counselor requirements in Tampa.

The pathway can look different on the West Coast, as well. If California is your destination, researching substance abuse counselor requirements in Stockton is essential. Online psychology degrees can help you gain essential skills while qualifying for licensure in many states, allowing for flexibility and geographic mobility as you plan your counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Leanne Togher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles