World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
9610
World Ranking
5678
National Ranking
328

Leanne Togher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne Togher sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 276 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leanne Togher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne Togher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leanne Togher is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and is primarily engaged in research within the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans various subfields, including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Rehabilitation.

The main topics in which Togher specializes include Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare, Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances.

Togher's recent publications include:

  • INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV: Cognitive-Communication and Social Cognition Disorders (2023, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation)
  • Recommendations for the Design and Implementation of Virtual Reality for Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Systematic Review (2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods, Overview, and Principles (2023, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation)
  • Digitally enabled aged care and neurological rehabilitation to enhance outcomes with Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) in Australia: A randomised controlled trial (2020, PLoS Medicine)
  • Improved Conversation Outcomes After Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Communication Partners: A Clinical Trial Investigating In-Person and Telehealth Delivery (2020, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Togher include:

  • Emma Power (33 publications)
  • Rachael Rietdijk (22 publications)
  • Melissa Brunner (21 publications)
  • Elise Elbourn (10 publications)
  • Miranda L. Rose (9 publications)

Togher's work has been published repeatedly in key venues relevant to speech-language pathology and brain injury rehabilitation. These venues include:

  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (12 publications)
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (10 publications)
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (8 publications)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (6 publications)
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement†

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;William Shadish

  • Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale

    Robyn L Tate;Skye McDonald;Michael Perdices;Leanne Togher

  • Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale

    Robyn L Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;Donna Wakim

  • Social Participation for Older People with Aphasia: The Impact of Communication Disability on Friendships

    Bronwyn Davidson;Tami Howe;Linda Worrall;Louise Hickson

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;Skye McDonald

  • INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication.

    Leanne Togher;Catherine Wiseman-Hakes;Jacinta M Douglas;Mary Stergiou-Kita

  • Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions

    Miranda Rose;Alison Ferguson;Emma Power;Leanne Togher

  • Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: a multicenter trial.

    Skye McDonald;Robyn Tate;Leanne Togher;Cristina Bornhofen

  • Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism

    David Trembath;Susan Balandin;Leanne Togher;Roger J. Stancliffe

  • Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial

    Leanne Togher;Skye McDonald;Chris Code;Susan Grant

  • Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners

    L Togher;L Hand;C Code

  • INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part II: attention and information processing speed.

    Jennie Louise Ponsford;Mark Theodore Bayley;Catherine Wiseman-Hakes;Leanne Togher

  • Training secondary school teachers in instructional language modification techniques to support adolescents with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial.

    Julia Starling;Natalie Munro;Leanne Togher;Joanne Arciuli

  • Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial.

    Leanne Togher;Skye McDonald;Robyn Tate;Emma Power

  • Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial

    Leanne Hassett;Maayken van den Berg;Richard I. Lindley;Maria Crotty

  • The design, conduct and report of single-case research: resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature.

    Robyn L Tate;Michael Perdices;Skye McDonald;Leanne Togher

  • Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales

    Leanne Togher;Emma Power;Robyn Tate;Skye McDonald

  • Return of Voice for Ventilated Tracheostomy Patients in ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early-Targeted Intervention.

    Amy L. Freeman-Sanderson;Leanne Togher;Mark R. Elkins;Paul R. Phipps

  • Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury

    Skye McDonald;Chris Code;Leanne Togher

  • Social and Communication Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury

    Skye McDonald;Leanne Togher;Chris Code

  • Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication.

    David Trembath;Susan Balandin;Leanne Togher

Frequent Co-Authors

Skye McDonald
Skye McDonald University of New South Wales
Robyn L. Tate
Robyn L. Tate University of Sydney
Susan Balandin
Susan Balandin Deakin University
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Chris Code
Chris Code University of Exeter
Jacinta Douglas
Jacinta Douglas La Trobe University
Linda Worrall
Linda Worrall University of Queensland
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Tamara Ownsworth
Tamara Ownsworth Griffith University
Roger J. Stancliffe
Roger J. Stancliffe University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to diverse and impactful career paths. One of the fastest-growing areas is substance abuse counseling, which requires specialized knowledge and compassion. Requirements, certifications, and licensing standards can vary from city to city, so it’s important to understand what’s needed for your region.

For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis will need to meet specific education and supervised experience criteria. If you are considering a move to Florida, you should review what's required for how to become a substance abuse counselor in St. Petersburg or learn more about substance abuse counselor requirements in Tampa.

The pathway can look different on the West Coast, as well. If California is your destination, researching substance abuse counselor requirements in Stockton is essential. Online psychology degrees can help you gain essential skills while qualifying for licensure in many states, allowing for flexibility and geographic mobility as you plan your counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Leanne Togher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles