World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
49
Citations
8363
World Ranking
2286
National Ranking
575

Jude W. Grosser publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jude W. Grosser sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 239 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Jude W. Grosser D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jude W. Grosser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genome

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Protoplast, Somatic fusion, Citrus × sinensis and Rutaceae. His Botany study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Orange. His Protoplast research incorporates themes from Rootstock, Plant breeding and Callus.

His study in Somatic fusion is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Citrus rootstock, Ploidy, Hybrid and Cultivar. His Citrus × sinensis study incorporates themes from Transformation and Somatic embryogenesis. His Rutaceae research integrates issues from Shoot and Germination.

His most cited work include:

  • Protoplast Fusion and Citrus Improvement (246 citations)
  • Somatic hybridization in citrus: An effective tool to facilitate variety improvement (161 citations)
  • Intergeneric somatic hybrid plants from sexually incompatible woody species: Citrus sinensis and Severinia disticha (96 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jude W. Grosser mostly deals with Botany, Horticulture, Rootstock, Somatic fusion and Protoplast. His work deals with themes such as Citrus × sinensis, Ploidy and Somatic embryogenesis, which intersect with Botany. His study looks at the relationship between Horticulture and topics such as Transformation, which overlap with Transgene, Epicotyl and Explant culture.

His work in the fields of Citrus rootstock overlaps with other areas such as Selection. As part of his studies on Somatic fusion, Jude W. Grosser often connects relevant subjects like Hybrid. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Hybrid, focusing on Biotechnology and, on occasion, Crop.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (39.33%)
  • Horticulture (35.96%)
  • Rootstock (26.97%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Horticulture (35.96%)
  • Rootstock (26.97%)
  • Orange (22.47%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Horticulture, Rootstock, Orange, Genetics and Plant disease resistance. His work on Cultivar, Hybrid and Citrus × sinensis as part of general Horticulture research is frequently linked to Salinity and Metabolomics, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Hybrid research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ploidy and Genomics.

His Rootstock research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Agroforestry, Plant defense against herbivory and Germplasm. His work carried out in the field of Orange brings together such families of science as Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, Greenhouse and Orange juice. In his study, Protoplast is strongly linked to Somatic fusion, which falls under the umbrella field of Cell biology.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Potential use of the DREB/ERF, MYB, NAC and WRKY transcription factors to improve abiotic and biotic stress in transgenic plants (53 citations)
  • Enhanced resistance to citrus canker in transgenic mandarin expressing Xa21 from rice. (21 citations)
  • Development of Improved Fruit, Vegetable, and Ornamental Crops Using the CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technique (16 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genome

His main research concerns Horticulture, Genetics, Transformation, Plant disease resistance and Citrus × sinensis. His study in Orange, Cultivar, Rootstock and Grand Nain are all subfields of Horticulture. The study of Rootstock is intertwined with the study of Orange juice in a number of ways.

His research on Genetics frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Rutaceae. He interconnects Somatic embryogenesis, Protoplast and Callus in the investigation of issues within Transformation. His Citrus × sinensis study combines topics in areas such as Promoter, Gene, Transgene and Regulatory sequence.

Best Publications

  • Protoplast Fusion and Citrus Improvement

    Jude W. Grosser;Frederick G. Gmitter

  • Potential use of the DREB/ERF, MYB, NAC and WRKY transcription factors to improve abiotic and biotic stress in transgenic plants

    Ligia Erpen;Ligia Erpen;H. Sunitibala Devi;Jude W. Grosser;Manjul Dutt

  • Somatic hybridization in citrus: An effective tool to facilitate variety improvement

    Jude W. Grosser;Patrick Ollitrault;O. Olivares-Fuster

  • Protoplast fusion for production of tetraploids and triploids: applications for scion and rootstock breeding in citrus

    Jude W. Grosser;Fred G. Gmitter

  • Transgenic Citrus Expressing an Arabidopsis NPR1 Gene Exhibit Enhanced Resistance against Huanglongbing (HLB; Citrus Greening).

    Manjul Dutt;Gary Barthe;Michael Irey;Jude Grosser

  • Silicon nanoparticles mitigate oxidative stress of in vitro-derived banana (Musa acuminata ‘Grand Nain’) under simulated water deficit or salinity stress

    Lamiaa M. Mahmoud;Lamiaa M. Mahmoud;Manjul Dutt;Ameer M. Shalan;Mahmoud E. El-Kady

  • Intergeneric somatic hybrid plants from sexually incompatible woody species: Citrus sinensis and Severinia disticha

    J. W. Grosser;F. G. Gmitter;J. L. Chandler

  • Evaluation of parameters affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrus.

    M. Dutt;J. W. Grosser

  • Intergeneric somatic hybrid plants of Citrus sinensis cv. Hamlin and Poncirus trifoliata cv. Flying Dragon.

    J. W. Grosser;F. G. Gmitter;J. L. Chandler

  • Leaf Characteristics and Net Gas Exchange of Diploid and Autotetraploid Citrus

    R Romero-Aranda;B.R Bondada;J.P Syvertsen;J.W Grosser

  • Targeted cybridization in citrus: transfer of Satsuma cytoplasm to seedy cultivars for potential seedlessness.

    W. W. Guo;D. Prasad;Y. J. Cheng;P. Serrano

  • Temporal and spatial control of gene expression in horticultural crops.

    Manjul Dutt;Sadanand A Dhekney;Leonardo Soriano;Raju Kandel

  • Allotetraploid hybrids between citrus and seven related genera produced by somatic hybridization

    J. W. Grosser;F. A. A. Mourao-Fo;F. G. Gmitter;E. S. Louzada

  • Somatic Hybridization of Citrus with Wild Relatives for Germplasm Enhancement and Cultivar Development

    Jude W. Grosser;Frederick G. Gmitter

  • An alternative method for the genetic transformation of sweet orange.

    G. H. Fleming;O. Olivares-Fuster;S. Fatta Del-Bosco;J. W. Grosser

  • Plant Regeneration of `Valencia' Sweet Orange, `Femminello' Lemon, and the Interspecific Somatic Hybrid following Protoplasm Fusion

    N. Tusa;J.W. Grosser;F.G. Gmitter

  • Further evidence of a cybridization requirement for plant regeneration from citrus leaf protoplasts following somatic fusion

    J. W. Grosser;F. G. Gmitter;N. Tusa;G. Reforgiato Recupero

  • Intergeneric somatichhybrid plants from protoplast fusion of Fortunella crassifolia cultivar ‘Meiwa’ with Citrus sinensis cultivar ‘Valencia’☆

    Xiu Xin Deng;Jude W. Grosser;Frederick G. Gmitter

  • Somatic hybrid plants from sexually incompatible woody species: Citrus reticulata and Citropsis gilletiana.

    J. W. Grosser;F. G. Gmitter;N. Tusa;J. L. Chandler

  • 2004 SIVB CONGRESS SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS “THINKING OUTSIDE THE CELL”: APPLICATIONS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION AND CYBRIDIZATION IN CROP IMPROVEMENT, WITH CITRUS AS A MODEL

    J. W. Grosser;F. G. Gmitter

  • Comparative transcript profiling of a male sterile cybrid pummelo and its fertile type revealed altered gene expression related to flower development.

    Bei-Bei Zheng;Xiao-Meng Wu;Xiao-Xia Ge;Xiu-Xin Deng

  • Protoplast transformation and regeneration of transgenic Valencia sweet orange plants containing a juice quality-related pectin methylesterase gene.

    Wenwu Guo;Yanxin Duan;Oscar Olivares-Fuster;Zhencai Wu

  • iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis revealed alterations of carbohydrate metabolism pathways and mitochondrial proteins in a male sterile cybrid pummelo.

    Bei-Bei Zheng;Yan-Ni Fang;Zhi-Yong Pan;Li Sun

  • An embryogenic suspension cell culture system for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrus.

    M. Dutt;J. W. Grosser

  • Six New Somatic Citrus Hybrids and Their Potential for Cultivar Improvement

    Jude W. Grosser;Frederick G. Gmitter;Franca Sesto;Xiu Xin Deng

  • Non-random inheritance of mitochondrial genomes in Citrus hybrids produced by protoplast fusion

    C.M. Cabasson;François Luro;Patrick Ollitrault;Jude W. Grosser

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick G. Gmitter
Frederick G. Gmitter University of Florida
Xiuxin Deng
Xiuxin Deng Huazhong Agricultural University
James H. Graham
James H. Graham University of Florida
Ed Stover
Ed Stover United States Department of Agriculture
Nabil Killiny
Nabil Killiny University of Florida
Nian Wang
Nian Wang University of Florida
Chad E. Finn
Chad E. Finn Agricultural Research Service
Alan L. Wright
Alan L. Wright University of Florida
Charles A. Leslie
Charles A. Leslie University of California, Davis
Xinnian Dong
Xinnian Dong Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jude W. Grosser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles