World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
19746
World Ranking
2572
National Ranking
20

Brian J. Hall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Hall sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 362 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian J. Hall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Hall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian J. Hall is affiliated with New York University Shanghai in China. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with substantial contributions in Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Health as subfields.

The thematic focus of their work covers diverse and interconnected topics. These include COVID-19 and Mental Health, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Migration, Health and Trauma, Mental Health Research Topics, Health disparities and outcomes, Employment and Welfare Studies, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

Brian J. Hall has contributed to various academic publication venues, reflecting a broad interdisciplinary reach. Frequent venues include UNC Libraries, Journal of Affective Disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry, European journal of psychotraumatology, and Asian Journal of Psychiatry.

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Brian J. Hall include:

  • Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (2022, The Lancet Public Health)
  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis (2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS))
  • The neglected health of international migrant workers in the COVID-19 epidemic (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Media use and acute psychological outcomes during COVID-19 outbreak in China (2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders)
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis (2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)

Their frequent collaborators span multiple areas of expertise and include Gen Li, Carl A. Latkin, Yu-Tao Xiang, Wen Chen, and Hao Fong Sit, each having co-authored multiple publications with Brian J. Hall. This network of co-authors highlights interdisciplinary cooperation within mental health and social science research domains.

Best Publications

  • Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology.

    Jon D. Elhai;Robert D. Dvorak;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall

  • Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Robert D. Dvorak;Brian J. Hall

  • Refining our Understanding of Traumatic Growth in the Face of Terrorism: Moving from Meaning Cognitions to Doing what is Meaningful

    Stevan E. Hobfoll;Brian J. Hall;Daphna Canetti‐Nisim;Sandro Galea

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Pre-migration and post-migration factors associated with mental health in humanitarian migrants in Australia and the moderation effect of post-migration stressors: findings from the first wave data of the BNLA cohort study

    Wen Chen;Wen Chen;Brian J Hall;Brian J Hall;Brian J Hall;Li Ling;Andre M. N Renzaho

  • The neglected health of international migrant workers in the COVID-19 epidemic.

    Andrian Liem;Cheng Wang;Yosa Wariyanti;Carl A Latkin

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Robert D. Dvorak;Brian J. Hall

  • Association of Depressive Symptoms With Incident Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-Aged and Older Chinese Adults.

    Haibin Li;Deqiang Zheng;Zhiwei Li;Zhiyuan Wu

  • Fear of missing out: Testing relationships with negative affectivity, online social engagement, and problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Ahmad M. Alghraibeh;Ali A. Alafnan

  • The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: A review of the literature and conceptual frameworks.

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall

  • Trajectories of Resilience, Resistance, and Distress During Ongoing Terrorism: The Case of Jews and Arabs in Israel

    Stevan E. Hobfoll;Patrick A. Palmieri;Regina Jones Johnson;Daphna Canetti-Nisim

  • Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese young adults: Fear of missing out as a mediator.

    Jon D. Elhai;Haibo Yang;Jianwen Fang;Xuejun Bai

  • The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall;Jon D. Elhai

  • Media use and acute psychological outcomes during COVID-19 outbreak in China.

    Miao Chao;Dini Xue;Tour Liu;Haibo Yang

  • Global, regional, and national mortality among young people aged 10–24 years, 1950–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Joseph L Ward;Peter S Azzopardi;Kate Louise Francis;John S Santelli

  • Mapping 123 million neonatal, infant and child deaths between 2000 and 2017

    Roy Burstein;Nathaniel J. Henry;Michael L. Collison;Laurie B. Marczak

  • Depression and emotion regulation predict objective smartphone use measured over one week

    Jon D. Elhai;Mojisola F. Tiamiyu;Justin W. Weeks;Jason C. Levine

  • The Limits of Resilience: Distress Following Chronic Political Violence among Palestinians

    Stevan E. Hobfoll;Anthony D. Mancini;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall;Daphna Canetti

  • Prevalence of prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers: A comprehensive meta-analysis of observational surveys

    Wen-Wang Rao;Xiao-Min Zhu;Qian-Qian Zong;Qinge Zhang

  • The psychological impact of impending forced settler disengagement in Gaza: Trauma and posttraumatic growth

    Brian J. Hall;Stevan E. Hobfoll;Patrick A. Palmieri;Daphna Canetti-Nisim

  • Proneness to Boredom Mediates Relationships Between Problematic Smartphone Use With Depression and Anxiety Severity

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Juanita K. Vasquez;Samuel D. Lustgarten;Jason C. Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

Stevan E. Hobfoll
Stevan E. Hobfoll Rush University Medical Center
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Gabor S. Ungvari
Gabor S. Ungvari University of Notre Dame Australia
Carl A. Latkin
Carl A. Latkin Johns Hopkins University
Yu-Tao Xiang
Yu-Tao Xiang University of Macau
Bach Xuan Tran
Bach Xuan Tran Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Joseph D. Tucker
Joseph D. Tucker University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andre M. N. Renzaho
Andre M. N. Renzaho Western Sydney University
Shafiu Mohammed
Shafiu Mohammed Ahmadu Bello University
Simon I. Hay
Simon I. Hay University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up flexible online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students aim to become licensed mental health counselors or pursue specialized roles in behavioral analysis. Requirements for practicing often vary by location and profession. For example, those looking into counseling should be aware of the Washington DC mental health counselor education requirements, as these can differ greatly from region to region.

Some locations may place greater emphasis on certification. Prospective students in Kansas, for instance, should understand the Wichita mental health counselor certification requirements to ensure they meet local standards. Similarly, the Winston Salem mental health counselor education requirements highlight how each state or city might have unique academic and practical prerequisites for licensure.

For those interested in applied behavior analysis, understanding salary trends can inform career decisions. Reviewing data on bcba highest salary by state can help highlight lucrative job markets and show where advanced qualifications may result in higher earnings. Researching these pathways is key to choosing the right online program and building a psychology career that matches your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Brian J. Hall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles