World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3401 3136 366 347 309 13191

Cherie Armour publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cherie Armour between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cherie Armour published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 21.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2015. 42 of the 388 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2015. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 22 publications
2008 2025

388 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cherie Armour: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 9
2010 9
2011 17
2012 7
2013 18
2014 30
2015 38
2016 26
2017 23
2018 30
2019 19
2020 21
2021 34
2022 28
2023 35
2024 20
2025 22
Total 388
Download as CSV

Cherie Armour publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cherie Armour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 309 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 309
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cherie Armour D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cherie Armour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cherie Armour is affiliated with Queen's University Belfast in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily within the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology. Their work spans experimental and cognitive psychology, general health professions, social psychology, and health.

The research interests of Cherie Armour cover a range of mental health topics, including posttraumatic stress disorder research, migration, health and trauma, child abuse and trauma, and resilience and mental health. Additionally, they investigate mental health research topics with a particular emphasis on COVID-19 and mental health, as well as intimate partner and family violence.

Recent published papers featuring Cherie Armour include:

  • Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study (2021), published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Clinical characteristics with inflammation profiling of long COVID and association with 1-year recovery following hospitalisation in the UK: a prospective observational study (2022), published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021), published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • Examining temporal interactions between loneliness and depressive symptoms and the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties among UK residents during the COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal results from the COVID-19 psychological wellbeing study (2021), published in Journal of Affective Disorders

Cherie Armour has frequently collaborated with other researchers. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Emily McGlinchey
  • Gerome Breen
  • Thalia C. Eley
  • Andrew M. McIntosh
  • Matthew Hotopf

Their research has appeared in a variety of publication venues, with multiple papers published in:

  • European journal of psychotraumatology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • BMC Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study

    Jenny M. Groarke;Emma Berry;Lisa Graham-Wisener;Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Adult experience of mental health outcomes as a result of intimate partner violence victimisation: a systematic review

    Susan Lagdon;Cherie Armour;Maurice Stringer

  • Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model

    Cherie Armour;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Tory A. Durham;Ruby Charak

  • Replicability and Generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Networks: A Cross-Cultural Multisite Study of PTSD Symptoms in Four Trauma Patient Samples

    Eiko I Fried;Marloes B Eidhof;Sabina Palic;Giulio Costantini

  • A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and correlates in U.S. military veterans

    Cherie Armour;Eiko I. Fried;Marie K. Deserno;Jack Tsai

  • Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms

    Jon D. Elhai;Tracey L. Biehn;Cherie Armour;Cherie Armour;Jessica J. Klopper

  • Personality Trait Level and Change as Predictors of Health Outcomes: Findings From a National Study of Americans (MIDUS)

    Nicholas A. Turiano;Lindsay Pitzer;Cherie Armour;Arun Karlamangla

  • A systematic literature review of PTSD's latent structure in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV to DSM-5.

    Cherie Armour;Jana Műllerová;Jon D. Elhai

  • PTSD-8: A Short PTSD Inventory.

    Maj Hansen;Tonny Elmose Andersen;Cherie Armour;Ask Elklit

  • Evidence for a unique PTSD construct represented by PTSD's D1-D3 symptoms

    Cherie Armour;JD Elhai;TL Biehn;JJ Klopper

  • Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.

    Jack Tsai;Ilan Harpaz-Rotem;Cherie Armour;Steven M. Southwick

  • Functional significance of a novel 7-factor model of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans study.

    Robert H. Pietrzak;Robert H. Pietrzak;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Cherie Armour;Natalie Mota

  • Mental health, behavioural problems and treatment seeking among students commencing university in Northern Ireland.

    Margaret McLafferty;Coral R. Lapsley;Edel Ennis;Cherie Armour

  • Distress tolerance and mindfulness mediate relations between depression and anxiety sensitivity with problematic smartphone use

    Jon D. Elhai;Jason C. Levine;Kelsey D. O’Brien;Cherie Armour

  • Factor Structure of the CES‐D and Measurement Invariance Across Gender in Mainland Chinese Adolescents

    Mengcheng Wang;Cherie Armour;Yan Wu;Fen Ren

  • Towards a chatbot for digital counselling

    Gillian Cameron;David M Cameron;Gavin Megaw;Raymond B Bond

  • DSM-5 PTSD's symptom dimensions and relations with major depression's symptom dimensions in a primary care sample

    Ateka A. Contractor;Tory A. Durham;Julie A. Brennan;Julie A. Brennan;Cherie Armour;Cherie Armour

  • Assessing the underlying dimensionality of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in Chinese adolescents surviving the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.

    Li Wang;Lingmin Zhang;Cherie Armour;Chengqi Cao

  • Evidence of the dissociative PTSD subtype: A systematic literature review of latent class and profile analytic studies of PTSD.

    Maj Hansen;Jana Ross;Cherie Armour

  • Introduction to Qualitative Methods in Psychology. A Book Review

    Cherie Armour

Frequent Co-Authors

Ask Elklit
Ask Elklit University of Southern Denmark
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Mark Shevlin
Mark Shevlin University of Ulster
Ateka A. Contractor
Ateka A. Contractor University of North Texas
Robert H. Pietrzak
Robert H. Pietrzak Yale University
Brendan Bunting
Brendan Bunting University of Ulster
Philip Hyland
Philip Hyland National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Maurice Mulvenna
Maurice Mulvenna University of Ulster
Gary Adamson
Gary Adamson University of Ulster
David Forbes
David Forbes University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and career opportunities in counseling, mental health, and education. Many universities across the USA have developed robust online counseling degrees tailored to meet growing workforce demands.

State-specific trends highlight unique strengths and program options. For instance, you can learn more about the most popular counseling degree programs in Georgia, offering flexible online learning and specialization tracks. Massachusetts, known for its high academic standards, is home to some of the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Massachusetts, preparing graduates for licensure and advanced practice.

The Midwest and Northeast are also strong hubs for counseling education. Students interested in the region should explore popular counseling degrees in Michigan, which offer both flexibility and high employment outcomes. In the tri-state area, popular counseling programs in New Jersey equip students with practical skills for a diverse client base.

As demand for mental health professionals continues to increase, pursuing an online degree provides a pathway to meaningful careers while accommodating busy lifestyles and career changers.

Best Scientists Citing Cherie Armour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles