World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10939 10237 1068 1020 110 4108

Gary Adamson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary Adamson between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary Adamson published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2007. 4 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2007. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1970 2025

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary Adamson: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 5
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 6
2006 4
2007 14
2008 3
2009 14
2010 5
2011 12
2012 13
2013 11
2014 7
2015 4
2016 2
2017 0
2018 4
2019 2
2020 6
2021 4
2022 3
2023 0
2024 1
2025 3
Total 132
Download as CSV

Gary Adamson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Adamson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary Adamson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Adamson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gary Adamson is affiliated with the University of Ulster in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Physiology, Health, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, and Nephrology.

The scientist's research covers multiple main topics, notably:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Corneal surgery and disorders

Gary Adamson has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • Axial growth and refractive change in white European children and young adults: predictive factors for myopia, 2020, published in Scientific Reports
  • Depression trajectories among older community dwelling adults: Results from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), 2021, published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Using a generic definition of cachexia in patients with kidney disease receiving haemodialysis: a longitudinal (pilot) study, 2020, published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Healthcare Utilisation by Older Adults: A Latent Transition Analysis of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, 2021, published in Journal of Aging and Health
  • Esotropia Outcomes and the Influence of Delay to Wearing Full Hypermetropic Correction, 2020, published in Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus

This scientist frequently publishes in several journals. The notable publication venues include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Aging and Health
  • Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Gary Adamson collaborates with various co-authors regularly, including:

  • John Mallett
  • Ann Sinéad Doherty
  • Clare McKeaveney
  • Adrian Slee
  • Andrew Davenport

Best Publications

  • Cumulative Traumas and Psychosis: an Analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey and the British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey

    Mark Shevlin;James E. Houston;Martin J. Dorahy;Gary Adamson

  • Trauma and psychosis: an analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey.

    Mark Shevlin;Martin J. Dorahy;Gary Adamson

  • Subtypes of depression in a nationally representative sample.

    Natacha Carragher;Gary Adamson;Brendan Bunting;Siobhan McCann

  • Childhood traumas and hallucinations: an analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey.

    Mark Shevlin;Martin J. Dorahy;Gary Adamson

  • Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ-12: a large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis.

    Mark Shevlin;Gary Adamson

  • Childhood Sexual Abuse, Early Cannabis Use, and Psychosis: Testing an Interaction Model Based on the National Comorbidity Survey

    James E. Houston;Jamie Murphy;Gary Adamson;Maurice Stringer

  • The distribution of positive psychosis-like symptoms in the population: A latent class analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey

    Mark Shevlin;Jamie Murphy;Martin J. Dorahy;Gary Adamson

  • Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour

    Carol McClenahan;Mark Shevlin;Gary Adamson;Cara Bennett

  • A Population Based Analysis of Subclinical Psychosis and Help-Seeking Behavior

    Jamie Murphy;Mark Shevlin;James Houston;Gary Adamson

  • Bullying in schools: a Northern Ireland study

    Katrina Collins;Gerry McAleavy;Gary Adamson

  • Childhood adversity and hallucinations: a community-based study using the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

    Mark Shevlin;Jamie Murphy;John Read;John Mallett

  • Cannabis use and psychosis: re-visiting the role of childhood trauma

    JE Houston;Jamie Murphy;Mark Shevlin;Gary Adamson

  • A Monte Carlo Examination of an MTMM Model With Planned Incomplete Data Structures

    Brendan P. Bunting;Gary Adamson;Peter K. Mulhall

  • Examining the factor structure and differential functioning of the Eysenck personality questionnaire revised - abbreviated

    Sarah Forrest;Christopher Alan Lewis;Mark Shevlin

  • Axial growth and refractive change in white European children and young adults: predictive factors for myopia.

    Sara McCullough;Gary Adamson;Karen M M Breslin;Julie F McClelland

  • An evaluation of the factor structure and predictive utility of a test anxiety scale with reference to students' past performance and personality indices.

    David McIlroy;Brendan Bunting;Gary Adamson

  • Reconciling the differences between the King et al. (1998) and Simms et al. (2002) factor models of PTSD

    Mark Shevlin;Orla McBride;Cherie Armour;Gary Adamson

  • A latent class analysis of DSM-IV pathological gambling criteria in a nationally representative British sample.

    Orla McBride;Gary Adamson;Mark Shevlin

  • Profiling schoolchildren in pain and associated demographic and behavioural factors: A latent class approach

    Gary Adamson;Sam Murphy;Mark Shevlin;Peter Buckle

  • Modeling the Structure of the Attitudes and Belief Scale 2 using CFA and Bifactor Approaches : Toward the Development of an Abbreviated Version

    Philip Hyland;Mark Shevlin;Gary Adamson;Daniel Boduszek

  • A latent class analysis of trauma based on a nationally representative sample of US adolescents

    Gillian C. McChesney;Gary Adamson;Mark Shevlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Shevlin
Mark Shevlin University of Ulster
Daniel Boduszek
Daniel Boduszek University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Philip Hyland
Philip Hyland National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Brendan Bunting
Brendan Bunting University of Ulster
Orla McBride
Orla McBride University of Ulster
Cherie Armour
Cherie Armour Queen's University Belfast
Andrew Davenport
Andrew Davenport University College London
Denis Fouque
Denis Fouque Hôpital Édouard-Herriot
Martin J. Dorahy
Martin J. Dorahy University of Canterbury
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to numerous online programs and diverse career options. Many students choose online bachelor’s or master’s degrees in psychology, counseling, or mental health, which offer flexibility for working professionals and those seeking career changes. These programs can prepare you for various roles, such as counseling, school psychology, or research.

If you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist, it’s essential to know that requirements vary significantly by state. For example, the Nashville licensed therapist requirements differ from those in other cities. If you’re aiming to practice in Louisiana, you may want to review how to become a licensed therapist in New Orleans. In larger cities, regulations can be even more specific, so exploring how to become a licensed therapist in New York City and licensed therapist requirements in Newark is crucial.

Understanding the educational and licensure steps ensures you choose the most appropriate degree and location for your future career. Online psychology degrees can support you on your journey, but always check local licensure guidelines to maximize your qualifications and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Adamson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles