World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4264
World Ranking
9954
National Ranking
12

Daniel Boduszek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Boduszek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Boduszek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Boduszek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Boduszek is affiliated with the University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland. Their research spans multiple domains within Psychology and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology as well as intersections with General Health Professions, Health, Sociology, and Political Science. Their published work comprises 41 contributions in Psychology and 20 in Social Sciences.

Their research topics include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Daniel Boduszek's frequent coauthors are:

  • Agata Debowska
  • Dominic Willmott
  • Beata Horeczy
  • George K. Hales
  • Dariusz Doliński

Their work has been published in venues where they have multiple papers, including:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Mental Health and Social Inclusion
  • European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Daniel Boduszek include:

  • A repeated cross-sectional survey assessing university students' stress, depression, anxiety, and suicidality in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland (2020, Psychological Medicine)
  • What works to change identity? A rapid evidence assessment of interventions (2021, Journal of Applied Social Psychology)
  • Prevalence and correlates of non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt among children and adolescents: Findings from Uganda and Jamaica (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Emotion regulation difficulties and psychopathology among Pakistani adolescents (2020, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry)
  • Psychopathic Personality Traits Scale- Revised (PPTS-R): Empirical Investigation of Construct Validity and Dimensionality in a Forensic and Non-Forensic Sample (2021, Deviant Behavior)

Best Publications

  • A repeated cross-sectional survey assessing university students' stress, depression, anxiety, and suicidality in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland

    Agata Debowska;Agata Debowska;Beata Horeczy;Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Dariusz Dolinski

  • What do we know about child abuse and neglect patterns of co-occurrence? A systematic review of profiling studies and recommendations for future research.

    Agata Debowska;Dominic Willmott;Daniel Boduszek;Adele D. Jones

  • Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, self-esteem, and job stress as determinants of job satisfaction

    Eithne Reilly;Katie Dhingra;Daniel Boduszek

  • Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators using the Integrated Motivational–Volitional model of suicidal behaviour

    Katie Dhingra;Daniel Boduszek;Rory C O’Connor

  • The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A Bifactor Answer to a Two-Factor Question?

    Michael T. McKay;Daniel Boduszek;Séamus A. Harvey

  • The factor structure and composite reliability of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among ex-prisoners

    Daniel Boduszek;Philip Hyland;Katie Dhingra;John Mallett

  • Child abuse and neglect profiles and their psychosocial consequences in a large sample of incarcerated males

    Agata Debowska;Daniel Boduszek

  • Critical evaluation of psychopathy measurement (PCL-R and SRP-III/SF) and recommendations for future research

    Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Agata Debowska

  • A structural test of the Integrated Motivational-Volitional model of suicidal behaviour

    Katie Dhingra;Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Rory C. O'Connor

  • Psychopathy and criminal behaviour: a psychosocial research perspective

    Katie Dhingra;Daniel Boduszek

  • Introduction and validation of Psychopathic Personality Traits Scale (PPTS) in a large prison sample

    Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Agata Debowska;Katie Dhingra;Matthew DeLisi

  • A bifactor approach to modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

    Philip Hyland;Daniel Boduszek;Katie Dhingra;Mark Shevlin

  • The Theoretical Model of Criminal Social Identity: Psycho-social Perspective

    Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Philip Hyland;Philip Hyland

  • The Role of Psychopathy and Exposure to Violence in Rape Myth Acceptance

    Agata Debowska;Daniel Boduszek;Katie Dhingra;Susanna Kola

  • Are Prisoners More Psychopathic than Non-forensic Populations? Profiling Psychopathic Traits among Prisoners, Community Adults, University Students, and Adolescents

    Daniel Boduszek;Agata Debowska;Nicole Sherretts;Dominic Willmott

  • Victim, perpetrator, and offense characteristics in filicide and filicide–suicide

    Agata Debowska;Daniel Boduszek;Katie Dhingra

  • Introduction and validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS): An empirical investigation of the Story Model

    Dominic Willmott;Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Agata Debowska;Russell Woodfield

  • Prosocial video game as an intimate partner violence prevention tool among youth: A randomised controlled trial

    Daniel Boduszek;Daniel Boduszek;Agata Debowska;Adele D. Jones;Minhua Ma

  • Modeling the Structure of the Attitudes and Belief Scale 2 using CFA and Bifactor Approaches : Toward the Development of an Abbreviated Version

    Philip Hyland;Mark Shevlin;Gary Adamson;Daniel Boduszek

  • Resolving a difference between cognitive therapy and rational emotive behaviour therapy: towards the development of an integrated CBT model of psychopathology

    Philip Hyland;Daniel Boduszek

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Hyland
Philip Hyland National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Mark Shevlin
Mark Shevlin University of Ulster
Gary Adamson
Gary Adamson University of Ulster
Orla McBride
Orla McBride University of Ulster
Matt DeLisi
Matt DeLisi Iowa State University
Rory C. O'Connor
Rory C. O'Connor University of Glasgow
Thanos Karatzias
Thanos Karatzias Edinburgh Napier University
Richard P. Bentall
Richard P. Bentall University of Sheffield
Michael J. Boulton
Michael J. Boulton University of Chester
Frédérique Vallières
Frédérique Vallières Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in psychology, pursuing related online degrees can open doors to various rewarding career pathways, such as counseling, social work, or marriage and family therapy. Many students explore becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) due to the growing demand for mental health professionals across the United States.

Requirements to become an MFT can vary by location. For example, the Boston mft education requirements focus on obtaining a master's degree in a relevant field, accumulating supervised clinical hours, and successfully passing state licensing exams. Likewise, understanding the Buffalo mft education requirements will help you navigate the necessary steps in New York.

For those considering working in other regions, it’s essential to review details such as the Chandler mft education requirements or learn how to become an mft in Charlotte. These resources offer helpful insights into the academic credentials, practical training, and licensure needed for MFTs in different cities. Researching specific state requirements is crucial when planning your psychology career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Boduszek

Trending Scientists