World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
13747
World Ranking
8166
National Ranking
110

Hirokazu Kato publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hirokazu Kato sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 248 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hirokazu Kato D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hirokazu Kato sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hirokazu Kato is affiliated with the Nara Institute of Science and Technology in Japan. Their academic work spans multiple fields, primarily in Computer Science and Engineering, with a significant focus on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The research topics covered by Hirokazu Kato include:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

Their recent scholarly papers highlight diverse subject matters and publication venues, such as:

  • "Surface Remeshing: A Systematic Literature Review of Methods and Research Directions," 2020, published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Virtual Reality as a Reflection Technique for Public Speaking Training," 2021, published in Applied Sciences
  • "Subseafloor sulphide deposit formed by pumice replacement mineralisation," 2021, published in Scientific Reports
  • "Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Training Systems," 2022, published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Selection framework of visualization methods in designing AR industrial task-support systems," 2022, published in Computers in Industry

Hirokazu Kato frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Yuichiro Fujimoto
  • Masayuki Kanbara
  • Taishi Sawabe
  • Alexander Plopski
  • Isidro Butaslac

Their publications appear across key venues with multiple contributions to the following journals and conferences:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Sensors
  • Computers & Graphics
  • Applied Sciences
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system

    H. Kato;M. Billinghurst

  • The MagicBook - moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality

    M. Billinghurst;H. Kato;I. Poupyrev

  • Virtual object manipulation on a table-top AR environment

    H. Kato;M. Billinghurst;I. Poupyrev;K. Imamoto

  • Collaborative augmented reality

    Mark Billinghurst;Hirokazu Kato

  • The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface

    Mark Billinghurst;Hirokazu Kato;Ivan Poupyrev

  • Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation

    Marc Ericson C. Santos;Angie Chen;Takafumi Taketomi;Goshiro Yamamoto

  • Collaborative Mixed Reality

    Mark Billinghurst;Hirokazu Kato

  • Augmented reality as multimedia: the case for situated vocabulary learning.

    Marc Ericson Chavez Santos;Arno in Wolde Lübke;Takafumi Taketomi;Goshiro Yamamoto

  • Touch-Space: Mixed Reality Game Space Based on Ubiquitous, Tangible, and Social Computing

    Adrian David Cheok;Xubo Yang;Zhou Zhi Ying;Mark Billinghurst

  • Developing a generic augmented-reality interface

    I. Poupyrev;D.S. Tan;M. Billinghurst;H. Kato

  • Tangible augmented reality

    Mark Billinghurst;Hirokazu Kato;Ivan Poupyrev

  • Mixing realities in Shared Space: an augmented reality interface for collaborative computing

    M. Billinghurst;I. Poupyrev;H. Kato;R. May

  • Explorations in the use of augmented reality for geographic visualization

    Nicholas R. Hedley;Mark Billinghurst;Lori Postner;Richard May

  • Augmented Reality versus Virtual Reality for 3D Object Manipulation

    Max Krichenbauer;Goshiro Yamamoto;Takafumi Taketom;Christian Sandor

  • Real world teleconferencing

    M. Billinghurst;A. Cheok;S. Prince;H. Kato

  • The effects of shadow representation of virtual objects in augmented reality

    Natsuki Sugano;Hirokazu Kato;Keihachiro Tachibana

  • MagicBook: transitioning between reality and virtuality

    Mark Billinghurst;Hirokazu Kato;Ivan Poupyrev

  • Tracking a surface in a 3-dimensional scene using natural visual features of the surface

    Mark Nathan Billinghurst;Hirokazu Kato

  • 3D live: real time captured content for mixed reality

    Simon Prince;Adrian David Cheok;Farzam Farbiz;Todd Williamson

  • Communication behaviors of co-located users in collaborative AR interfaces

    K. Kiyokawa;M. Billinghurst;S. E. Hayes;A. Gupta

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Adrian David Cheok
Adrian David Cheok i-University Tokyo
Ivan Poupyrev
Ivan Poupyrev Google (United States)
Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Holger Regenbrecht
Holger Regenbrecht University of Otago
Wataru Sato
Wataru Sato Kyoto University
Didier Stricker
Didier Stricker German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Bruce H. Thomas
Bruce H. Thomas University of South Australia
Steven Feiner
Steven Feiner Columbia University
Kiyoshi Kiyokawa
Kiyoshi Kiyokawa Nara Institute of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to various related fields and career pathways, many of which are available through flexible online learning. If you are considering options beyond traditional computer science, several interdisciplinary and technical fields offer valuable skills and diverse job prospects.

For those interested in sustainability and technology, pursuing an online environmental engineering degree can prepare you for impactful careers addressing global environmental challenges. Similarly, if mechanical systems and engineering innovation excite you, seeking out the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online can make this path more accessible and affordable.

For a deeper understanding of scientific principles and computational methods, you might consider an online physics bachelor's degree. Finally, with the surge in demand for data professionals, following a data science learning path can unlock lucrative roles in data analysis and machine learning.

Each of these pathways supports a range of opportunities and enables you to tailor your studies to your personal interests and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Hirokazu Kato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles