World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 60 3230 3136 1569 1511 277 14747

Tobias Höllerer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tobias Höllerer between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tobias Höllerer published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2009. 27 of the 318 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2009. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications
1993 2025

318 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tobias Höllerer: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 3
1998 0
1999 3
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 8
2005 7
2006 11
2007 10
2008 17
2009 22
2010 7
2011 13
2012 18
2013 15
2014 16
2015 20
2016 20
2017 17
2018 13
2019 14
2020 7
2021 11
2022 7
2023 14
2024 15
2025 12
Total 318
Download as CSV

Tobias Höllerer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Höllerer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 272–281 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 277 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335 277
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Tobias Höllerer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Höllerer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337 60
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Tobias Höllerer is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science, focusing on areas such as computer vision, artificial intelligence, and human-computer interaction. Their body of work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience and aerospace engineering.

The researcher has published notable papers including:

  • Investigating Search Among Physical and Virtual Objects Under Different Lighting Conditions, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • A Tangible Spherical Proxy for Object Manipulation in Augmented Reality, 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • Impact of Annotator Demographics on Sentiment Dataset Labeling, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labels, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Tangible Spherical Proxy for Object Manipulation in Augmented Reality, 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)

Their frequent collaborators include Pradeep Sen, Noah Stier, Radha Kumaran, Alex Rich, and Misha Sra.

The venues in which Tobias Höllerer has most frequently published are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)

Their research topics cover:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Tobias Höllerer received the ACM Distinguished Member award in 2013.

Best Publications

  • A touring machine: prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment

    S. Feiner;B. MacIntyre;T. Hollerer;A. Webster

  • Exploring MARS: Developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system

    Tobias Höllerer;Steven Feiner;Tachio Terauchi;Gus Rashid

  • Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors and Feature Descriptors for Visual Tracking

    Steffen Gauglitz;Tobias Höllerer;Matthew Turk

  • View management for virtual and augmented reality

    Blaine Bell;Steven Feiner;Tobias Höllerer

  • Augmented Reality: Principles and Practice

    Dieter Schmalsteig;Tobias Hollerer

  • Handy AR: Markerless Inspection of Augmented Reality Objects Using Fingertip Tracking

    Taehee Lee;T. Hollerer

  • Information filtering for mobile augmented reality

    S. Julier;M. Lanzagorta;Y. Baillot;L. Rosenblum

  • Augmented reality: Principles and practice

    Dieter Schmalstieg;Tobias Hollerer

  • TasteWeights: a visual interactive hybrid recommender system

    Svetlin Bostandjiev;John O'Donovan;Tobias Höllerer

  • Situated documentaries: embedding multimedia presentations in the real world

    T. Hollerer;S. Feiner;J. Pavlik

  • World-stabilized annotations and virtual scene navigation for remote collaboration

    Steffen Gauglitz;Benjamin Nuernberger;Matthew Turk;Tobias Höllerer

  • TopicNets: Visual Analysis of Large Text Corpora with Topic Modeling

    Brynjar Gretarsson;John O’Donovan;Svetlin Bostandjiev;Tobias Höllerer

  • Enveloping users and computers in a collaborative 3D augmented reality

    A. Butz;T. Hollerer;S. Feiner;B. MacIntyre

  • User Interface Management Techniques for Collaborative Mobile Augmented Reality

    Tobias Höllerer;Steven Feiner;Drexel Hallaway;Blaine Bell

  • Resolving multiple occluded layers in augmented reality

    Unknown

  • PeerChooser: visual interactive recommendation

    John O'Donovan;Barry Smyth;Brynjar Gretarsson;Svetlin Bostandjiev

  • Resolving multiple occluded layers in augmented reality

    Mark A. Livingston;J. Edward Swan;Joseph L. Gabbard;Tobias H. Höllerer

  • Technical Section: Annotation in outdoor augmented reality

    Jason Wither;Stephen DiVerdi;Tobias Höllerer

  • Interactive Tools for Virtual X-Ray Vision in Mobile Augmented Reality

    Ryan Bane;Tobias Hollerer

  • Botivist: Calling Volunteers to Action using Online Bots

    Saiph Savage;Andres Monroy-Hernandez;Tobias Höllerer

  • I’m feeling LoCo: A Location Based Context Aware Recommendation System

    Norma Saiph Savage;Maciej Baranski;Norma Elva Chavez;Tobias Höllerer

  • Information filtering for mobile augmented reality

    S. Julier;Y. Baillot;D. Brown;M. Lanzagorta

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Turk
Matthew Turk Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Steven Feiner
Steven Feiner Columbia University
Doug A. Bowman
Doug A. Bowman Virginia Tech
Alex Olwal
Alex Olwal Google (United States)
Dieter Schmalstieg
Dieter Schmalstieg University of Stuttgart
Andreas Butz
Andreas Butz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Cleotilde Gonzalez
Cleotilde Gonzalez Carnegie Mellon University
Simon Julier
Simon Julier University College London
Joseph L. Gabbard
Joseph L. Gabbard Virginia Tech
Haruo Takemura
Haruo Takemura Osaka University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA can open the door to a wide array of specialized online degrees and potential career pathways. Today, it's easier than ever to gain advanced credentials from the comfort of your home, tailored to fit evolving industry needs.

For those considering leadership or management roles, online emba programs offer technical professionals the business acumen needed to move into executive positions. If your interests lean towards digital information, data curation, or library management, pursuing a masters in library science may provide the specialized expertise you need.

Budget-conscious learners can also search for an affordable master degree online without sacrificing academic quality or career advancement. For those eyeing high-level leadership, research, or academic roles, a phd in leadership online could be the next step.

Each of these flexible online options helps you customize your academic journey to your career ambitions—wherever your path in computer science may lead.

Best Scientists Citing Tobias Höllerer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles