World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
14747
World Ranking
3230
National Ranking
1569

Tobias Höllerer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Höllerer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 277 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tobias Höllerer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Höllerer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Tobias Höllerer is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science, focusing on areas such as computer vision, artificial intelligence, and human-computer interaction. Their body of work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience and aerospace engineering.

The researcher has published notable papers including:

  • Investigating Search Among Physical and Virtual Objects Under Different Lighting Conditions, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • A Tangible Spherical Proxy for Object Manipulation in Augmented Reality, 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • Impact of Annotator Demographics on Sentiment Dataset Labeling, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labels, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Tangible Spherical Proxy for Object Manipulation in Augmented Reality, 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)

Their frequent collaborators include Pradeep Sen, Noah Stier, Radha Kumaran, Alex Rich, and Misha Sra.

The venues in which Tobias Höllerer has most frequently published are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)

Their research topics cover:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Tobias Höllerer received the ACM Distinguished Member award in 2013.

Best Publications

  • A touring machine: prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment

    S. Feiner;B. MacIntyre;T. Hollerer;A. Webster

  • Exploring MARS: Developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system

    Tobias Höllerer;Steven Feiner;Tachio Terauchi;Gus Rashid

  • Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors and Feature Descriptors for Visual Tracking

    Steffen Gauglitz;Tobias Höllerer;Matthew Turk

  • View management for virtual and augmented reality

    Blaine Bell;Steven Feiner;Tobias Höllerer

  • Augmented Reality: Principles and Practice

    Dieter Schmalsteig;Tobias Hollerer

  • Handy AR: Markerless Inspection of Augmented Reality Objects Using Fingertip Tracking

    Taehee Lee;T. Hollerer

  • Information filtering for mobile augmented reality

    S. Julier;M. Lanzagorta;Y. Baillot;L. Rosenblum

  • Augmented reality: Principles and practice

    Dieter Schmalstieg;Tobias Hollerer

  • TasteWeights: a visual interactive hybrid recommender system

    Svetlin Bostandjiev;John O'Donovan;Tobias Höllerer

  • Situated documentaries: embedding multimedia presentations in the real world

    T. Hollerer;S. Feiner;J. Pavlik

  • World-stabilized annotations and virtual scene navigation for remote collaboration

    Steffen Gauglitz;Benjamin Nuernberger;Matthew Turk;Tobias Höllerer

  • TopicNets: Visual Analysis of Large Text Corpora with Topic Modeling

    Brynjar Gretarsson;John O’Donovan;Svetlin Bostandjiev;Tobias Höllerer

  • Enveloping users and computers in a collaborative 3D augmented reality

    A. Butz;T. Hollerer;S. Feiner;B. MacIntyre

  • User Interface Management Techniques for Collaborative Mobile Augmented Reality

    Tobias Höllerer;Steven Feiner;Drexel Hallaway;Blaine Bell

  • Resolving multiple occluded layers in augmented reality

    Unknown

  • PeerChooser: visual interactive recommendation

    John O'Donovan;Barry Smyth;Brynjar Gretarsson;Svetlin Bostandjiev

  • Resolving multiple occluded layers in augmented reality

    Mark A. Livingston;J. Edward Swan;Joseph L. Gabbard;Tobias H. Höllerer

  • Technical Section: Annotation in outdoor augmented reality

    Jason Wither;Stephen DiVerdi;Tobias Höllerer

  • Interactive Tools for Virtual X-Ray Vision in Mobile Augmented Reality

    Ryan Bane;Tobias Hollerer

  • Botivist: Calling Volunteers to Action using Online Bots

    Saiph Savage;Andres Monroy-Hernandez;Tobias Höllerer

  • I’m feeling LoCo: A Location Based Context Aware Recommendation System

    Norma Saiph Savage;Maciej Baranski;Norma Elva Chavez;Tobias Höllerer

  • Information filtering for mobile augmented reality

    S. Julier;Y. Baillot;D. Brown;M. Lanzagorta

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Turk
Matthew Turk Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Steven Feiner
Steven Feiner Columbia University
Doug A. Bowman
Doug A. Bowman Virginia Tech
Alex Olwal
Alex Olwal Google (United States)
Dieter Schmalstieg
Dieter Schmalstieg University of Stuttgart
Andreas Butz
Andreas Butz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Cleotilde Gonzalez
Cleotilde Gonzalez Carnegie Mellon University
Simon Julier
Simon Julier University College London
Joseph L. Gabbard
Joseph L. Gabbard Virginia Tech
Haruo Takemura
Haruo Takemura Osaka University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA can open the door to a wide array of specialized online degrees and potential career pathways. Today, it's easier than ever to gain advanced credentials from the comfort of your home, tailored to fit evolving industry needs.

For those considering leadership or management roles, online emba programs offer technical professionals the business acumen needed to move into executive positions. If your interests lean towards digital information, data curation, or library management, pursuing a masters in library science may provide the specialized expertise you need.

Budget-conscious learners can also search for an affordable master degree online without sacrificing academic quality or career advancement. For those eyeing high-level leadership, research, or academic roles, a phd in leadership online could be the next step.

Each of these flexible online options helps you customize your academic journey to your career ambitions—wherever your path in computer science may lead.

Best Scientists Citing Tobias Höllerer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles