World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
17673
World Ranking
6660
National Ranking
2943

Blair MacIntyre publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blair MacIntyre sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 147 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Blair MacIntyre D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blair MacIntyre sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Blair MacIntyre is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Within this domain, their work focuses extensively on Human-Computer Interaction, alongside research contributions in Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology, and Social Psychology.

The academic contributions of Blair MacIntyre cover a variety of topics related to technology's application and impact. These include:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Conferences and Exhibitions Management
  • Social Media in Health Education
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Recent papers authored by or associated with MacIntyre include:

  • "IEEEVR2020: Exploring the First Steps Toward Standalone Virtual Conferences," 2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • "Social VR: A Promising Platform for Enhancing Mental Wellness among College Students," 2023, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • "RealityMedia: immersive technology and narrative space," 2023, Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • "Social Presence in Virtual Event Spaces," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • "The Acropolis on the Immersive Web," 2021, The Journal of Media Innovations

MacIntyre has coauthored frequently with:

  • Kyle Johnsen
  • John Swan
  • Kiyoshi Kiyokawa
  • Jay David Bolter
  • Maria Engberg

Their publication record includes contributions to several key venues, including:

  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

In addition to journal articles and conference papers, Blair MacIntyre has published books. Notably, they have a book published by The MIT Press titled "Reality Media," released in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in augmented reality

    R. Azuma;Y. Baillot;R. Behringer;S. Feiner

  • Knowledge-based augmented reality

    Steven Feiner;Blair Macintyre;Dorée Seligmann

  • The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research

    Cory D. Kidd;Robert Orr;Gregory D. Abowd;Christopher G. Atkeson

  • A touring machine: prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment

    S. Feiner;B. MacIntyre;T. Hollerer;A. Webster

  • A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom

    Keith R. Bujak;Iulian Radu;Richard Catrambone;Blair Macintyre

  • DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences

    Blair MacIntyre;Maribeth Gandy;Steven Dow;Jay David Bolter

  • Windows on the world: 2D windows for 3D augmented reality

    Steven Feiner;Blair MacIntyre;Marcus Haupt;Eliot Solomon

  • RoomAlive: magical experiences enabled by scalable, adaptive projector-camera units

    Brett Jones;Rajinder Sodhi;Michael Murdock;Ravish Mehra

  • Augmented Reality in Architectural Construction, Inspection, and Renovation

    Anthony Webster;Steven Feiner;Blair MacIntyre;William Massie

  • Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays

    Blair MacIntyre;Elizabeth D. Mynatt;Stephen Voida;Klaus M. Hansen

  • Wizard of Oz support throughout an iterative design process

    S. Dow;B. MacIntyre;J. Lee;C. Oezbek

  • Enveloping users and computers in a collaborative 3D augmented reality

    A. Butz;T. Hollerer;S. Feiner;B. MacIntyre

  • Presence and engagement in an interactive drama

    Steven Dow;Manish Mehta;Ellie Harmon;Blair MacIntyre

  • New Media and the Permanent Crisis of Aura

    Jay David Bolter;Blair MacIntyre;Maribeth Gandy;Petra Schweitzer

  • Exploring spatial narratives and mixed reality experiences in Oakland Cemetery

    Steven Dow;Jaemin Lee;Christopher Oezbek;Blair Maclntyre

  • Integrating virtual and physical context to support knowledge workers

    S. Voida;E.D. Mynatt;B. MacIntyre;G.M. Corso

  • A distributed 3D graphics library

    Blair MacIntyre;Steven Feiner

  • Living laboratories: the future computing environments group at the Georgia Institute of Technology

    Gregory D. Abowd;Christopher G. Atkeson;Aaron F. Bobick;Irfan A. Essa

  • Augmented reality as a new media experience

    B. MacIntyre;J.D. Bolter;E. Moreno;B. Hannigan

  • Art of defense: a collaborative handheld augmented reality board game

    Duy-Nguyen Ta Huynh;Karthik Raveendran;Yan Xu;Kimberly Spreen

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven Dow
Steven Dow University of California, San Diego
Elizabeth D. Mynatt
Elizabeth D. Mynatt Northeastern University
Steven Feiner
Steven Feiner Columbia University
Simon Julier
Simon Julier University College London
Michael Mateas
Michael Mateas University of California, Santa Cruz
Greg Turk
Greg Turk Georgia Institute of Technology
Daniel Wagner
Daniel Wagner University of Pennsylvania
Tobias Höllerer
Tobias Höllerer University of California, Santa Barbara
Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Christopher G. Atkeson
Christopher G. Atkeson Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens various pathways, both for traditional degrees and accelerated online programs. Online options often offer flexibility and lower costs, making them appealing for both working professionals and recent graduates.

If you're interested in analytics, consider pursuing the cheapest data science degree programs to gain high-demand skills without breaking the bank. Alternatively, fields like engineering are also accessible online, with a focus on managing expenses and value – research the electrical engineering online tuition costs to compare top programs.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, 3-month certificate programs that pay well provide a fast-track opportunity into lucrative tech roles. And if you want to boost your qualifications further, many universities offer the quickest masters degree online options, helping you advance your education in less time.

Whatever your goals, there are a variety of flexible, affordable, and accelerated online pathways to launch or grow your computer science career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Blair MacIntyre

Trending Scientists