World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
45181
World Ranking
3928
National Ranking
238

Simon Julier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Julier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 232 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Simon Julier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Julier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simon Julier is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and works primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their work covers a range of topics, with notable focus areas such as Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks, Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference, Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications, Augmented Reality Applications, Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques, Spatial Cognition and Navigation, and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis.

Recent publications by Simon Julier include the following papers:

  • Using visual and auditory cues to locate out-of-view objects in head-mounted augmented reality, 2021, published in Displays
  • Directing versus Attracting Attention: Exploring the Effectiveness of Central and Peripheral Cues in Panoramic Videos, 2020, published in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • MDPose: Human Skeletal Motion Reconstruction Using WiFi Micro-Doppler Signatures, 2023, published in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
  • Task-Consistent Path Planning for Mobile 3D Printing, 2021, published in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • Attention-Based Applications in Extended Reality to Support Autistic Users: A Systematic Review, 2022, published in IEEE Access

Simon Julier has frequently published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

Frequent coauthors in Simon Julier's work include Wenda Li, Shelly Vishwakarma, Kevin Chetty, Nisar Ahmed, and Christoffer Heckman, each having collaborated on multiple publications.

Best Publications

  • Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation

    S.J. Julier;J.K. Uhlmann

  • New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems

    Simon J. Julier;Jeffrey K. Uhlmann

  • Recent advances in augmented reality

    R. Azuma;Y. Baillot;R. Behringer;S. Feiner

  • A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators

    S. Julier;J. Uhlmann;H.F. Durrant-Whyte

  • A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems

    S.J. Julier;J.K. Uhlmann;H.F. Durrant-Whyte

  • The scaled unscented transformation

    S.J. Julier

  • A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknown correlations

    S.J. Julier;J.K. Uhlmann

  • Reduced sigma point filters for the propagation of means and covariances through nonlinear transformations

    S.J. Julier;J.K. Uhlmann

  • Sigma-Point Kalman Filters for Nonlinear Estimation and Sensor-Fusion: Applications to Integrated Navigation

    Rudolph van der Merwe;Eric Wan;Simon Julier

  • Sigma-Point Kalman Filters for Nonlinear Estimation and Sensor Fusion: Applications to Integrated Navigation

    R van der Merwe;E Wan;SJ Julier

  • The spherical simplex unscented transformation

    S.J. Julier

  • General Decentralized Data Fusion with Covariance Intersection

    Simon Julier;Jeffrey K. Uhlmann

  • A counter example to the theory of simultaneous localization and map building

    S.J. Julier;J.K. Uhlmann

  • Interpretability of deep learning models: A survey of results

    Supriyo Chakraborty;Richard Tomsett;Ramya Raghavendra;Daniel Harborne

  • On Kalman Filtering With Nonlinear Equality Constraints

    S.J. Julier;J.J. LaViola

  • Information filtering for mobile augmented reality

    S. Julier;M. Lanzagorta;Y. Baillot;L. Rosenblum

  • Which Is Better, an Ensemble of Positive–Negative Pairs or a Centered Spherical Simplex Ensemble?

    Xuguang Wang;Craig H. Bishop;Simon J. Julier

  • Consistent debiased method for converting between polar and Cartesian coordinate systems

    Simon J. Julier;Jeffrey K. Uhlmann

  • Using covariance intersection for SLAM

    Simon J. Julier;Jeffrey K. Uhlmann

  • Distributed Fusion of PHD Filters Via Exponential Mixture Densities

    Murat Uney;Daniel E. Clark;Simon J. Julier

  • Information filtering for mobile augmented reality

    S. Julier;Y. Baillot;D. Brown;M. Lanzagorta

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze University College London
Uwe D. Hanebeck
Uwe D. Hanebeck Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Nicolai Marquardt
Nicolai Marquardt Microsoft (United States)
Joseph L. Gabbard
Joseph L. Gabbard Virginia Tech
Blair MacIntyre
Blair MacIntyre Georgia Institute of Technology
Tobias Höllerer
Tobias Höllerer University of California, Santa Barbara
Steven Feiner
Steven Feiner Columbia University
Hugh Durrant-Whyte
Hugh Durrant-Whyte University of Sydney
Mani Srivastava
Mani Srivastava University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online learning options can help you shape your career in technology and related fields. If you’re interested in expanding beyond computer science, many universities in the USA offer flexible distance programs that allow you to learn at your own pace and on your own schedule.

Many students choose hybrid or fully remote programs, such as a computer science degree online, to balance their studies with work or other responsibilities. These programs can help you access the same quality education as in-person degrees while providing the added convenience of online learning.

If your interests shift toward the environment, you may want to consider what you can do with an environmental studies degree. Careers in environmental science often intersect with technology, data analysis, and engineering.

Engineering is another excellent field to pursue online. For a focus on sustainability, look into the most affordable online environmental engineering degree programs. If you are interested in the intersection of technology, design, and manufacturing, an online degree in mechanical engineering might be a perfect fit.

Best Scientists Citing Simon Julier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles