World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
10075
World Ranking
7472
National Ranking
369

Uwe D. Hanebeck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe D. Hanebeck sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 586 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Uwe D. Hanebeck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe D. Hanebeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to nonlinear estimation and control

Overview

Uwe D. Hanebeck is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research spans a broad range of topics within engineering, with a particular focus on mechanical engineering and related fields.

The main fields of study covered in their publications include:

  • Engineering

Key subfields of study addressed by their work are:

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Aerospace Engineering

Their research topics frequently focus on:

  • Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering
  • Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
  • Industrial Engineering and Technologies
  • Engineering and Environmental Studies
  • Metallurgy and Material Forming
  • Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

Uwe D. Hanebeck has published extensively in various academic venues, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • 2022 25th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Some recent papers by Hanebeck and colleagues include:

  • Towards High-Performance Solid-State-LiDAR-Inertial Odometry and Mapping, 2021, Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Experimental Evaluation of a Novel Sensor-Based Sorting Approach Featuring Predictive Real-Time Multiobject Tracking, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
  • Unscented Dual Quaternion Particle Filter for SE(3) Estimation, 2020, IEEE Control Systems Letters
  • Localization with Magnetic Field Distortions and Simultaneous Magnetometer Calibration, 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal
  • Haptic-Guided Path Generation for Remote Car-Like Vehicles, 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Frequent collaborators in Hanebeck's research include:

  • Georg Maier
  • Harald Kruggel-Emden
  • Thomas Längle
  • Robin Gruna
  • Jürgen Beyerer

In 2017, Uwe D. Hanebeck was awarded the IEEE Fellow distinction for contributions to nonlinear estimation and control.

Best Publications

  • Template Matching using Fast Normalized Cross Correlation

    Kai Briechle;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • On entropy approximation for Gaussian mixture random vectors

    M.F. Huber;T. Bailey;H. Durrant-Whyte;U.D. Hanebeck

  • Towards High-Performance Solid-State-LiDAR-Inertial Odometry and Mapping

    Kailai Li;Meng Li;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Extended Object Tracking with Random Hypersurface Models

    Marcus Baum;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • WLAN-Based Pedestrian Tracking Using Particle Filters and Low-Cost MEMS Sensors

    Hui Wang;H. Lenz;A. Szabo;J. Bamberger

  • Shape tracking of extended objects and group targets with star-convex RHMs

    Marcus Baum;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Decentralized data fusion with inverse covariance intersection

    Benjamin Noack;Joris Sijs;Marc Reinhardt;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Random Hypersurface Models for extended object tracking

    Marcus Baum;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Analytic moment-based Gaussian process filtering

    Marc Peter Deisenroth;Marco F. Huber;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Robust Filtering and Smoothing with Gaussian Processes

    M. P. Deisenroth;R. D. Turner;M. F. Huber;U. D. Hanebeck

  • Progressive Bayes: a new framework for nonlinear state estimation

    Uwe D. Hanebeck;Kai Briechle;Andreas Rauh

  • Extended object and group tracking with Elliptic Random Hypersurface Models

    Marcus Baum;Benjamin Noack;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Motion compression for telepresent walking in large target environments

    Norbert Nitzsche;Uwe D. Hanebeck;Günther Schmidt

  • ROMAN: a mobile robotic assistant for indoor service applications

    U.D. Hanebeck;C. Fischer;G. Schmidt

  • Localization of a mobile robot using relative bearing measurements

    K. Briechle;U.D. Hanebeck

  • Minimum Covariance Bounds for the Fusion under Unknown Correlations

    Marc Reinhardt;Benjamin Noack;Pablo O. Arambel;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • A novel approach to proactive human-robot cooperation

    O.C. Schrempf;U.D. Hanebeck;A.J. Schmid;H. Worn

  • Gaussian Filter based on Deterministic Sampling for High Quality Nonlinear Estimation

    Marco F. Huber;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Set theoretic localization of fast mobile robots using an angle measurement technique

    U.D. Hanebeck;G. Schmidt

  • Unscented Orientation Estimation Based on the Bingham Distribution

    Igor Gilitschenski;Gerhard Kurz;Simon J. Julier;Uwe D. Hanebeck

  • Methods, configuration and computer program having program code means and computer program product for determining a position of a mobile communications device within a communications network

    Joachim Bamberger;Kai Briechle;Marian Grigoras;Uwe Hanebeck

  • Localized Cumulative Distributions and a multivariate generalization of the Cramér-von Mises distance

    U.D. Hanebeck;V. Klumpp

Frequent Co-Authors

Tamim Asfour
Tamim Asfour Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Simon Julier
Simon Julier University College London
Peter Willett
Peter Willett University of Connecticut
Marc Peter Deisenroth
Marc Peter Deisenroth University College London
Tanja Schultz
Tanja Schultz University of Bremen
Hugh Durrant-Whyte
Hugh Durrant-Whyte University of Sydney
Reinhold Haeb-Umbach
Reinhold Haeb-Umbach University of Paderborn
Rainer Stiefelhagen
Rainer Stiefelhagen Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Carl Edward Rasmussen
Carl Edward Rasmussen University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to various flexible online degree options in the USA. For those seeking advanced qualifications, it’s possible to find the cheapest doctorate degree programs online, making higher education more accessible to a wide range of learners. Fast-tracking your career is also achievable with online edd programs affordable, which offer accelerated studies without breaking the bank.

Busy professionals or those wanting to upskill quickly can look into a 6 month degree course—a practical way to gain new credentials in the shortest time possible. For those interested in combining business and tech skills, there are many online business degrees that complement computer science expertise and broaden career opportunities.

Whether you’re looking for affordability, speed, or career flexibility, online programs offer diverse pathways tailored to your goals. Exploring these options can save you time and money while setting you up for a successful career in technology or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Uwe D. Hanebeck

Trending Scientists