World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Xavier Vekemans

Xavier Vekemans

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
14697
World Ranking
16481
National Ranking
692

Xavier Vekemans publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xavier Vekemans sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 140 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Xavier Vekemans D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xavier Vekemans sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Xavier Vekemans is affiliated with the University of Lille in France and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans various subfields, including molecular biology, genetics, plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Their research concentrates on topics such as plant reproductive biology, plant and animal studies, genetic diversity and population structure, plant molecular biology research, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, chromosomal and genetic variations, and evolution and genetic dynamics.

Among recent publications attributed to the research community including Vekemans, notable papers include:

  • DILS: Demographic inferences with linked selection by using ABC, 2021, Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Evolution of self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: Lessons from a textbook example of natural selection, 2020, Evolutionary Applications
  • Maintenance of Adaptive Dynamics and No Detectable Load in a Range-Edge Outcrossing Plant Population, 2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Whole-genome sequencing and genome regions of special interest: Lessons from major histocompatibility complex, sex determination, and plant self-incompatibility, 2021, Molecular Ecology
  • Transition to Self-compatibility Associated With Dominant S-allele in a Diploid Siberian Progenitor of Allotetraploid Arabidopsis kamchatica Revealed by Arabidopsis lyrata Genomes, 2023, Molecular Biology and Evolution

Vekemans has collaborated frequently with several researchers in the field, including:

  • Vincent Castric
  • Mathieu Genête
  • Camille Roux
  • Éléonore Durand
  • Céline Poux

The scientist's work has been published in various venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Molecular Ecology Resources
  • eLife

This publication record reflects a broad engagement with research communities focusing on molecular ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and related disciplines. The diversity of topics and coauthors illustrates an interdisciplinary approach to studying plant reproductive biology and genetic mechanisms underlying self-incompatibility and adaptation.

Best Publications

  • spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels

    Olivier J. Hardy;Xavier Vekemans

  • New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations.

    Xavier Vekemans;Olivier J. Hardy

  • Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size.

    Xavier Vekemans;Thomas Beauwens;Muriel Lemaire;Isabel I. Roldán-Ruiz

  • Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models

    Olivier J Hardy;Xavier Vekemans

  • Chromosome-scale assemblies of plant genomes using nanopore long reads and optical maps

    Caroline Belser;Benjamin Istace;Erwan Denis;Marion Dubarry

  • Chloroplast DNA variation and postglacial recolonization of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Europe.

    Myriam Heuertz;S Fineschi;M Anzidei;R Pastorelli

  • Plant self-incompatibility in natural populations: a critical assessment of recent theoretical and empirical advances.

    Vincent Castric;Xavier Vekemans

  • Assessment of genetic diversity within and among germplasm accessions in cultivated sorghum using microsatellite markers

    Y. Djè;M. Heuertz;C. Lefèbvre;X. Vekemans

  • NUCLEAR MICROSATELLITES REVEAL CONTRASTING PATTERNS OF GENETIC STRUCTURE BETWEEN WESTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPEAN POPULATIONS OF THE COMMON ASH (FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR L.)

    Myriam Heuertz;Jean-Franclois Hausman;Olivier J. Hardy;Giovanni G. Vendramin

  • The effect of subdivision on variation at multi-allelic loci under balancing selection.

    Mikkel H. Schierup;Xavier Vekemans;Deborah Charlesworth

  • Estimating seed vs. pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash.

    Myriam Heuertz;Xavier Vekemans;Xavier Vekemans;JF Hausman;M Palada

  • Genetic variation in the endangered wild apple (Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill.) in Belgium as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism and microsatellite markers.

    Els Coart;Xavier Vekemans;Marinus J. M. Smulders;Iris Wagner

  • Gene and allelic genealogies at a gametophytic self-incompatibility locus.

    Xavier Vekemans;Montgomery Slatkin

  • Plant self-incompatibility systems: a molecular evolutionary perspective

    Deborah Charlesworth;Xavier Vekemans;Vincent Castric;Sylvain Glémin

  • QUANTIFYING GENE FLOW FROM SPATIAL GENETIC STRUCTURE DATA IN A METAPOPULATION OF CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA (LEGUMINOSAE)

    Charles B. Fenster;Xavier Vekemans;Olivier J. Hardy

  • Repeated adaptive introgression at a gene under multiallelic balancing selection.

    Vincent Castric;Jesper Bechsgaard;Mikkel H. Schierup;Xavier Vekemans

  • The signature of balancing selection: Fungal mating compatibility gene evolution

    Georgiana May;Frank Shaw;Hassan Badrane;Xavier Vekemans

  • On the evolution of heavy‐metal tolerant populations in Armeria maritima: evidence from allozyme variation and reproductive barriers

    Xavier Vekemans;C. Lefebvre

  • The Transition to Self-Compatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana and Evolution within S-Haplotypes over 10 Myr

    Jesper S. Bechsgaard;Vincent Castric;Deborah Charlesworth;Xavier Vekemans

  • MATE AVAILABILITY AND FECUNDITY SELECTION IN MULTI-ALLELIC SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS IN PLANTS.

    Xavier Vekemans;Mikkel M.H. Schierup;Freddy F.B. Christiansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivier J. Hardy
Olivier J. Hardy Université Libre de Bruxelles
Pierre Jacques Meerts
Pierre Jacques Meerts Université Libre de Bruxelles
Mikkel H. Schierup
Mikkel H. Schierup Aarhus University
Myriam Heuertz
Myriam Heuertz University of Bordeaux
Deborah Charlesworth
Deborah Charlesworth University of Edinburgh
Pierre Saumitou-Laprade
Pierre Saumitou-Laprade University of Lille
Hélène Bergès
Hélène Bergès INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Nicolas Bierne
Nicolas Bierne University of Montpellier
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Shamil R. Sunyaev Harvard University
Anne-Laure Jacquemart
Anne-Laure Jacquemart Université Catholique de Louvain

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to an array of online degree options and specialized career pathways. Many students explore online degrees in nutrition, which can lead to careers in health education, wellness coaching, and food science. Nutritionists are in demand across healthcare, corporate, and public health sectors.

There is also growing interest in technical healthcare roles. Programs like online sonography programs prepare students for diagnostic imaging careers, combining biology with hands-on technology skills. Similarly, an associates degree in radiology equips graduates to work as radiologic technologists in hospitals and clinics, interpreting images for medical teams.

If you aim to work directly with patients in medical nutrition therapy, exploring best dietitian programs online can help you qualify as a registered dietitian. Each of these online degree paths provides flexibility and strong employment prospects for students with a foundation in biology or biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Xavier Vekemans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles