World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
8900
World Ranking
5480
National Ranking
245

Myriam Heuertz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myriam Heuertz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Myriam Heuertz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myriam Heuertz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Myriam Heuertz is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, environmental science, and agricultural and biological sciences. Their research primarily focuses on genetics and related subfields such as plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, molecular biology, and ecology.

Their work covers a variety of main topics including genetic diversity and population structure, plant and animal studies, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, species distribution and climate change, and plant diversity and evolution.

Myriam Heuertz has published multiple research papers in notable peer-reviewed venues. Some of the recent papers include:

  • Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved (2020, Biological Conservation)
  • Post-2020 goals overlook genetic diversity (2020, Science)
  • Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible (2021, BioScience)
  • Genetic diversity goals and targets have improved, but remain insufficient for clear implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework (2023, Conservation Genetics)
  • Effective population size remains a suitable, pragmatic indicator of genetic diversity for all species, including forest trees (2020, Biological Conservation)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Myriam include:

  • Niklas Tysklind
  • Sylvain Schmitt
  • Sean Hoban
  • Ivan Paz-Vinas
  • Linda Laikre

The primary publication venues for their work are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Conservation Genetics
  • Biological Conservation

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Microsatellite Allele Sizes: A Simple Test to Assess Their Significance on Genetic Differentiation

    Olivier J Hardy;Nathalie Charbonnel;Hélène Fréville;Myriam Heuertz

  • Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved

    Sean Hoban;Michael Bruford;Josephine D'Urban Jackson;Margarida Lopes-Fernandes

  • Chloroplast DNA variation and postglacial recolonization of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Europe.

    Myriam Heuertz;S Fineschi;M Anzidei;R Pastorelli

  • Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst)

    Myriam Heuertz;Emanuele De Paoli;Thomas Källman;Hanna Larsson

  • Post-2020 goals overlook genetic diversity

    Linda Laikre;Linda Laikre;Sean Hoban;Sean Hoban;Michael W. Bruford;Michael W. Bruford;Gernot Segelbacher;Gernot Segelbacher

  • Assessment of genetic diversity within and among germplasm accessions in cultivated sorghum using microsatellite markers

    Y. Djè;M. Heuertz;C. Lefèbvre;X. Vekemans

  • NUCLEAR MICROSATELLITES REVEAL CONTRASTING PATTERNS OF GENETIC STRUCTURE BETWEEN WESTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPEAN POPULATIONS OF THE COMMON ASH (FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR L.)

    Myriam Heuertz;Jean-Franclois Hausman;Olivier J. Hardy;Giovanni G. Vendramin

  • Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible.

    Sean Hoban;Michael W Bruford;W Chris Funk;Peter Galbusera

  • Estimating seed vs. pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash.

    Myriam Heuertz;Xavier Vekemans;Xavier Vekemans;JF Hausman;M Palada

  • Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of European ashes, Fraxinus sp. (Oleaceae): roles of hybridization and life history traits.

    M. Heuertz;S. Carnevale;S. Fineschi;F. Sebastiani

  • Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist's view

    G Nieto Feliner;I Álvarez;J Fuertes-Aguilar;M Heuertz

  • Genetic structure and assignment tests demonstrate illegal translocation of red deer (Cervus elaphus) into a continuous population.

    A. C. Frantz;J. Tigel Pourtois;M. Heuertz;L. Schley

  • Living on the edge: timing of Rand Flora disjunctions congruent with ongoing aridification in Africa.

    Lisa Pokorny;Ricarda Riina;Mario Mairal;Andrea S. Meseguer

  • Comparative phylogeography of African rain forest trees: A review of genetic signatures of vegetation history in the Guineo-Congolian region

    Olivier J. Hardy;Céline Born;Katarina Budde;Kasso Daïnou

  • Advances in ecological genomics in forest trees and applications to genetic resources conservation and breeding.

    Jason A. Holliday;Sally N. Aitken;Janice E. K. Cooke;Bruno Fady

  • Forest tree genomics: 10 achievements from the past 10 years and future prospects

    Christophe Plomion;Christophe Plomion;Catherine Bastien;Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot;Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot;Laurent Bouffier;Laurent Bouffier

  • Molecular Proxies for Climate Maladaptation in a Long-Lived Tree (Pinus pinaster Aiton, Pinaceae)

    Juan-Pablo Jaramillo-Correa;Isabel Rodríguez-Quilón;Delphine Grivet;Camille Lepoittevin;Camille Lepoittevin

  • Assessment of genetic structure within and among Bulgarian populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.).

    Myriam Heuertz;Jean-François Hausman;Ivaylo Tsvetkov;Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste

  • Geography determines genetic relationships between species of mountain pine (Pinus mugo complex) in western Europe.

    Myriam Heuertz;Myriam Heuertz;Jennifer Teufel;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Alvaro Soto;Alvaro Soto

  • The complex biogeographic history of a widespread tropical tree species.

    Christopher C.W. Dick;Christopher C.W. Dick;Myriam Heuertz;Myriam Heuertz

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivier J. Hardy
Olivier J. Hardy Université Libre de Bruxelles
Santiago C. González-Martínez
Santiago C. González-Martínez University of Bordeaux
Giovanni G. Vendramin
Giovanni G. Vendramin National Research Council (CNR)
Jean-Louis Doucet
Jean-Louis Doucet Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech
Xavier Vekemans
Xavier Vekemans University of Lille
Christian Lexer
Christian Lexer University of Vienna
Christopher W. Dick
Christopher W. Dick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christophe Plomion
Christophe Plomion University of Bordeaux
Sean Hoban
Sean Hoban Morton Arboretum
Jean-Francois Hausman
Jean-Francois Hausman Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution can be enhanced by exploring related online degrees and flexible academic tracks. As digital learning becomes more accessible, options such as an online math degree can provide strong analytical skills useful in research, modeling, and data analysis within ecology and evolution fields.

For those interested in communicating scientific findings or enhancing presentation skills, online graphic design programs are a great way to learn visual storytelling. This is especially valuable in sharing research with academic and public audiences.

Flexibility is also key, and affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees allow students to tailor coursework to fit diverse interests, integrating subjects such as biology, environmental policy, or computer science.

Additionally, students considering career advancement or academic research roles may be interested in an online history master's degree, which can add context and depth to the understanding of environmental changes and evolutionary processes through time.

Best Scientists Citing Myriam Heuertz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles