World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
7349
World Ranking
4673
National Ranking
200

Bruno Fady publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Fady sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 174 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Bruno Fady D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Fady sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Fady is affiliated with INRAE: Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement in France. Their research spans multiple fields including Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work covers several specialized subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology. Key research topics include Genetic diversity and population structure, Forest ecology and management, Forest Insect Ecology and Management, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Forest Management and Policy, and Horticultural and Viticultural Research.

Bruno Fady has contributed to numerous recent scientific papers. Notable publications include:

  • "The GenTree Dendroecological Collection, tree-ring and wood density data from seven tree species across Europe" (2020, Scientific Data)
  • "Biodiversity, climate change, and adaptation in the Mediterranean" (2022, Ecosphere)
  • "Evolutionary rate and genetic load in an emblematic Mediterranean tree following an ancient and prolonged population collapse" (2020, Molecular Ecology)
  • "Adaptation to drought is coupled with slow growth, but independent from phenology in marginal silver fir ( Abies alba Mill.) populations" (2020, Evolutionary Applications)
  • "The legacy of climate variability over the last century on populations' phenotypic variation in tree height" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)

Frequent co-authors in their research include Giovanni G. Vendramin, Filippos A. Aravanopoulos, Francesca Bagnoli, Santiago C. González-Martínez, and Caroline Scotti-Saintagne.

Bruno Fady's work has appeared consistently in several publication venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Scientific Data, Molecular Ecology, and Current Forestry Reports.

The scientist has also contributed to book publications by FAO eBooks, including titles like "Indicators of the genetic diversity of trees - State, pressure, benefit and response" (2020) and "Delivering tree genetic resources in forest and landscape restoration" (2024).

Best Publications

  • Nature-based Solutions : New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in Europe

    Hilde Eggermont;Estelle Balian;Jose Manuel N. Azevedo;Victor Beumer

  • The GenTree Dendroecological Collection: tree-ring and wood density data from seven tree species across Europe

    Elisabet Martínez-Sancho;Lenka Slámová;Sandro Morganti;Claudio Grefen

  • The role of forest genetic resources in responding to biotic and abiotic factors in the context of anthropogenic climate change

    René I. Alfaro;Bruno Fady;Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin;Ian K. Dawson

  • Postglacial range expansion and its genetic imprints in Abies alba (Mill.) — A synthesis from palaeobotanic and genetic data

    Sascha Liepelt;Rachid Cheddadi;Jacques-Louis de Beaulieu;Bruno Fady

  • GENETICALLY DEPAUPERATE BUT WIDESPREAD: THE CASE OF AN EMBLEMATIC MEDITERRANEAN PINE

    Giovanni G. Vendramin;Bruno Fady;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Feng Sheng Hu;Feng Sheng Hu

  • Translating conservation genetics into management: Pan-European minimum requirements for dynamic conservation units of forest tree genetic diversity

    Jarkko Koskela;François Lefèvre;Silvio Schueler;Hojka Kraigher

  • Genetic effects of forest management practices: Global synthesis and perspectives

    R Wickneswari V Ratnam;Om P. Rajora;Reiner Finkeldey;Filippos Aravanopoulos

  • Evolution-based approach needed for the conservation and silviculture of peripheral forest tree populations

    Bruno Fady;Filippos A. Aravanopoulos;Paraskevi Alizoti;Csaba Mátyás

  • Forests and global change: what can genetics contribute to the major forest management and policy challenges of the twenty-first century?

    Bruno Fady;Joan Cottrell;Lennart Ackzell;Ricardo Alía

  • Advances in ecological genomics in forest trees and applications to genetic resources conservation and breeding.

    Jason A. Holliday;Sally N. Aitken;Janice E. K. Cooke;Bruno Fady

  • Fatty acids from seeds of Pinus pinea L.: composition and population profiling.

    Nizar Nasri;Abdelhamid Khaldi;Bruno Fady;Saida Triki

  • Considering evolutionary processes in adaptive forestry

    François Lefèvre;Thomas Boivin;Aurore Bontemps;François Courbet

  • Putative glacial refugia of Cedrus atlantica deduced from Quaternary pollen records and modern genetic diversity

    Rachid Cheddadi;Bruno Fady;L. François;L. Hajar

  • Forest tree genomics: 10 achievements from the past 10 years and future prospects

    Christophe Plomion;Christophe Plomion;Catherine Bastien;Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot;Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot;Laurent Bouffier;Laurent Bouffier

  • Macroecological patterns of species and genetic diversity in vascular plants of the Mediterranean basin

    Bruno Fady;Cyrille Conord

  • Modelling seed dispersal to predict seedling recruitment: Recolonization dynamics in a plantation forest

    Fabrice Sagnard;Fabrice Sagnard;Christian Pichot;Philippe Dreyfus;Pedro Jordano

  • Mediterranean forests, land use and climate change: a social-ecological perspective

    Thierry Gauquelin;Geneviève Michon;Richard Joffre;Robin Duponnois

  • Genomic and cDNA microsatellites from apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)

    L. S. Hagen;J. Chaib;B. Fady;V. Decroocq

  • Geography determines genetic relationships between species of mountain pine (Pinus mugo complex) in western Europe.

    Myriam Heuertz;Myriam Heuertz;Jennifer Teufel;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Alvaro Soto;Alvaro Soto

  • Large-scale longitudinal gradients of genetic diversity: a meta-analysis across six phyla in the Mediterranean basin.

    Cyrille Conord;Jessica Gurevitch;Bruno Fady

  • Characterization of nuclear microsatellites in Pinus halepensis Mill. and their inheritance in P. halepensis and Pinus brutia Ten.

    RN Keys;A Autino;Keith J Edwards;B Fady

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni G. Vendramin
Giovanni G. Vendramin National Research Council (CNR)
Santiago C. González-Martínez
Santiago C. González-Martínez University of Bordeaux
François Lefèvre
François Lefèvre INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Ricardo Alía
Ricardo Alía Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
Christophe Plomion
Christophe Plomion University of Bordeaux
Frédéric Médail
Frédéric Médail Aix-Marseille University
Myriam Heuertz
Myriam Heuertz University of Bordeaux
Martin Lascoux
Martin Lascoux Uppsala University
Panayotis Dimopoulos
Panayotis Dimopoulos University of Patras
Felix Gugerli
Felix Gugerli Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary career pathways. If you're seeking flexibility, online degree programs offer a convenient way to gain the skills needed in today’s dynamic job market. For example, those interested in the environmental and biological sciences may benefit from a strong analytical background. Programs like online mathematics degrees can enhance your data analysis and research capabilities.

For creative-minded students, considering fields that blend science and design can be rewarding. The best online graphic design degree programs can help you communicate scientific findings visually, a crucial skill in science communication and outreach careers.

Those interested in sustainability and environmental planning may look to naab-accredited online architecture degrees, which prepare graduates for roles in eco-friendly urban development and green building design. Additionally, if you are making a career shift, you might explore science-adjacent fields. For instance, some biology graduates transition into healthcare paths; understanding the education required to be a speech pathologist can provide insight into how your background can transfer to allied health professions.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Fady

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles