World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
23748
World Ranking
11931
National Ranking
6120

Edward Ellis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward Ellis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 304 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward Ellis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward Ellis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward Ellis is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and dentistry, with a particular emphasis on surgical and oral surgical disciplines.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Dentistry

Within these broader fields, their work focuses on several subfields, such as:

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Orthodontics
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy

Edward Ellis's research covers a series of key topics, notably:

  • Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

Their publication record includes a significant number of articles in several respected journals, particularly:

  • Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (13 publications)
  • International Journal of Business Information Systems (2 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (1 publication)
  • Seminars in Plastic Surgery (1 publication)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Edward Ellis showcase a focus on mandibular fractures, surgical treatment, and comparative effectiveness of interventions. These include:

  • Complications of Mandibular Fracture Repair and Secondary Reconstruction, 2020, Seminars in Plastic Surgery
  • Effectiveness of different treatments for odontogenic keratocyst: a network meta-analysis, 2022, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Comparison of the Accuracy of Maxillary Positioning With Interim Splints Versus Patient-Specific Guides and Plates in Executing a Virtual Bimaxillary Surgical Plan, 2022, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Combination of Rigid and Nonrigid Fixation Versus Nonrigid Fixation for Bilateral Mandibular Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Treatment for Adult Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials, 2023, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Edward Ellis frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Daniel Pérez
  • Felix Jose Amarista
  • Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi
  • Jason P. Jones
  • David Szalay

These collaborations have led to multiple publications, emphasizing the multidisciplinary and cooperative nature of their research in oral and maxillofacial surgery and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

    [edited by] James R. Hupp;Edward Ellis;Myron R. Tucker.

  • Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases

    Edward Ellis;Khursheed Francis Moos;Amir El-Attar

  • Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.

    Edmund C. Guyer;Edward E. Ellis;James A. McNamara;Rolf G. Behrents

  • Components of adult class III malocclusion

    Edward Ellis;James A. McNamara

  • Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate

    Edward Ellis;Lee R Walker

  • An analysis of 2,067 cases of zygomatico-orbital fracture

    Edward Ellis;Amir El-Attar;Khursheed Francis Moos

  • Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures

    Edward Ellis;David McFadden;Patricia Simon;Gaylord Throckmorton

  • Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations.

    Edward Ellis;Gaylord S. Throckmorton

  • Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh.

    Edward Ellis;Yinghui Tan

  • Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle

    Edward Ellis

  • Analysis of treatment for isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.

    Edward Ellis;Winai Kittidumkerng;Winai Kittidumkerng

  • Rigid fixation of mandibular condyle fractures

    Edward Ellis;Jeffrey Dean

  • Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures Using the AO Reconstruction Plate

    E. Ellis

  • Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process.

    Edward Ellis;Patricia Simon;Gaylord S. Throckmorton

  • Major psychological disorders in acute and chronic TMD: An initial examination

    Robert J. Gatchel;John Paul Garofalo;Edward Ellis;Charles Holt

  • Lag screw fixation of mandibular angle fractures

    Edward Ellis;G.E. Ghali

  • Lag screw fixation of anterior mandibular fractures

    Edward Ellis;G.E. Ghali

  • Surgical treatment of adult mandibular condylar fractures provides better outcomes than closed treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi;Edward Ellis

  • Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion☆

    Edward Ellis;James A. McNamara

  • Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two noncompression miniplates

    Edward Ellis;Lee Walker

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Gatchel
Robert J. Gatchel The University of Texas at Arlington
James A. McNamara
James A. McNamara University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter H. Buschang
Peter H. Buschang Texas A&M University
Craig G. Crandall
Craig G. Crandall The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and alternative career pathways to explore. These programs offer flexibility and specialized training without requiring a traditional, in-person medical school experience.

For those interested in nutrition and wellness, an online dietitian degree is a solid option that can lead to careers in healthcare, community education, or private practice. Aspiring healthcare administrators may want to pursue a program accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education (CAHME). Explore respected schools through the cahme resource for Master of Healthcare Administration degrees.

Registered nurses looking to advance their credentials and salary prospects can benefit from the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, which are ideal for working professionals seeking online study options. In addition, those aiming for the highest nursing qualifications may be interested in the shortest dnp programs to fast-track their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

These online programs provide accessible pathways for individuals passionate about healthcare, whether your interests lie in clinical practice, nutrition, or healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Edward Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles