World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stewart W. Franks

Stewart W. Franks

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 6944 6673 254 247 157 11646

Stewart W. Franks publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stewart W. Franks between 1996 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stewart W. Franks published across 23 years, from 1996 to 2018, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2005. 1 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2005. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1996 2018

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stewart W. Franks: publications per year, 1996 to 2018
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 9
2000 3
2001 7
2002 10
2003 18
2004 8
2005 29
2006 17
2007 9
2008 10
2009 7
2010 4
2011 6
2012 1
2013 3
2014 3
2015 7
2016 1
2017 0
2018 1
Total 160
Download as CSV

Stewart W. Franks publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart W. Franks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 157
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Stewart W. Franks D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart W. Franks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Stewart W. Franks is currently affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their academic profile reflects institutional association but does not provide specific details on research projects, exact fields of study, or publication records.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues listed, limiting insight into research collaborations or dissemination outlets. Similarly, no data is available regarding book publications authored or contributed to by Stewart W. Franks.

No information is provided concerning the main or subfields of study, nor on research topics covered. Awards or distinctions received by Stewart W. Franks have not been recorded in the provided data.

The available information establishes Stewart W. Franks as a researcher active within academia, specifically at the University of Tasmania, but lacks detailed content about their scholarly contributions or thematic areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences

    M. Sivapalan;K. Takeuchi;S. W. Franks;V. K. Gupta

  • Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors

    Benjamin Renard;Dmitri Kavetski;George Kuczera;Mark Thyer

  • Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory

    Dmitri Kavetski;Dmitri Kavetski;George Kuczera;Stewart W. Franks

  • Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application

    Dmitri Kavetski;Dmitri Kavetski;George Kuczera;Stewart W. Franks

  • Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops

    Q. Duan;J. Schaake;V. Andréassian;S. Franks

  • Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parameters

    George Kuczera;Dmitri Kavetski;Stewart Franks;Mark Thyer

  • Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis

    Mark Thyer;Benjamin Renard;Dmitri Kavetski;George Kuczera

  • Multi‐decadal variability of flood risk

    Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks;George Kuczera

  • Confronting Input Uncertainty in Environmental Modelling

    Dmitri Kavetski;Stewart W. Franks;George Kuczera

  • On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process.

    Stewart W. Franks;Stewart W. Franks;Philippe Gineste;Keith J. Beven;Philippe Merot

  • Multidecadal variability of rainfall and streamflow: Eastern Australia

    Danielle C. Verdon;Adam M. Wyatt;Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks

  • Long‐term behaviour of ENSO: Interactions with the PDO over the past 400 years inferred from paleoclimate records

    Danielle C. Verdon;Stewart W. Franks

  • Toward a reliable decomposition of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: Characterizing rainfall errors using conditional simulation

    Benjamin Renard;Dmitri Kavetski;Etienne Leblois;Mark Thyer

  • On the sensitivity of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: equifinality and the problem of robust calibration

    Stewart Franks;K. J. Beven;P. F. Quinn;I. R. Wright

  • Multi-decadal variability of drought risk, eastern Australia

    Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks

  • Flood frequency analysis: Evidence and implications of secular climate variability, New South Wales

    Stewart W. Franks;George Kuczera

  • Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited: 1. Overcoming numerical artefacts

    Dmitri Kavetski;George Kuczera;Stewart W. Franks

  • Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in land surface‐atmosphere flux predictions

    Stewart W. Franks;Stewart W. Franks;Keith J. Beven

  • Multi-parameter fingerprinting of sediment deposition in a small gullied catchment in SE Australia

    A.K. Krause;S.W. Franks;J.D. Kalma;R.J. Loughran

  • On the identification of ENSO-induced rainfall and runoff variability: a comparison of methods and indices

    Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks

Frequent Co-Authors

George Kuczera
George Kuczera University of Newcastle Australia
Dmitri Kavetski
Dmitri Kavetski University of Adelaide
Jetse D. Kalma
Jetse D. Kalma University of Newcastle Australia
Anthony S. Kiem
Anthony S. Kiem University of Newcastle Australia
Hoshin V. Gupta
Hoshin V. Gupta University of Arizona
Thorsten Wagener
Thorsten Wagener University of Potsdam
Keith Beven
Keith Beven Lancaster University
Murugesu Sivapalan
Murugesu Sivapalan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Matthew F. McCabe
Matthew F. McCabe King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Harald Kunstmann
Harald Kunstmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various online degree options that cater to different interests and career goals. For students seeking flexibility and a lighter course load, exploring the easy bachelor's degree programs can provide a manageable academic experience without compromising educational quality.

Those passionate about Earth's physical processes might consider online geology programs, which offer specialized training in rock formations, minerals, and natural resource management. The online geology programs highlighted by research.com showcase some of the top options to build a solid foundation in geosciences.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another growing field closely linked with environmental studies. GIS professionals use technology to analyze spatial data for environmental planning and conservation efforts. Checking out the best gis programs can help students find comprehensive courses that boost their technical skills.

For those interested in leadership and administrative roles in public or environmental sectors, pursuing an advanced degree like a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is beneficial. Many students appreciate the balance between rigor and accessibility found in the easiest online mpa programs, which can accelerate career advancement in policy and management.

Best Scientists Citing Stewart W. Franks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles