World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
8048
World Ranking
5300
National Ranking
186

Anthony S. Kiem publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony S. Kiem sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 185 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anthony S. Kiem D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony S. Kiem sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony S. Kiem is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a substantial number of publications contributing to these fields.

The main subfields of study they engage with include global and planetary change, atmospheric science, water science and technology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, and sociology and political science. Their work spans several critical topics such as climate variability and models, hydrology and drought analysis, hydrology and watershed management studies, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, climate change and health impacts, cryospheric studies and observations, and flood risk assessment and management.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Anthony S. Kiem include:

  • Tessa R. Vance
  • Emma Austin
  • Andrew D. Magee
  • Jane Rich
  • Brian Kelly

Their research has been published across several venues, with multiple papers appearing in the Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies, Communications Earth & Environment, Scientific Reports, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, and Climatic Change.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Causes of the Widespread 2019-2020 Australian Bushfire Season, 2020, Earth's Future
  • Concerns about climate change among rural residents in Australia, 2020, Journal of Rural Studies
  • Links between Large-Scale Modes of Climate Variability and Synoptic Weather Patterns in the Southern Indian Ocean, 2020, Journal of Climate
  • Fully integrated numerical simulation of surface water-groundwater interactions using SWAT-MODFLOW with an improved calibration tool, 2021, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
  • Evaluation of rainfall-runoff model performance under non-stationary hydroclimatic conditions, 2020, Hydrological Sciences Journal

Best Publications

  • Multi‐decadal variability of flood risk

    Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks;George Kuczera

  • Farmers׳ perception of drought impacts, local adaptation and administrative mitigation measures in Maharashtra State, India

    Parmeshwar Udmale;Yutaka Ichikawa;Sujata Manandhar;Hiroshi Ishidaira

  • Nature and causes of protracted droughts in southeast Australia: Comparison between the Federation, WWII, and Big Dry droughts

    Danielle C. Verdon-Kidd;Anthony S. Kiem

  • From barriers to limits to climate change adaptation: path dependency and the speed of change

    Jon Barnett;Louisa S. Evans;Catherine Gross;Anthony S. Kiem

  • Multidecadal variability of rainfall and streamflow: Eastern Australia

    Danielle C. Verdon;Adam M. Wyatt;Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks

  • Estimating potential evapotranspiration using Shuttleworth–Wallace model and NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data to feed a distributed hydrological model over the Mekong River basin

    M.C. Zhou;H. Ishidaira;H.P. Hapuarachchi;J. Magome

  • Natural hazards in Australia: droughts

    Anthony S. Kiem;Fiona Johnson;Seth Westra;Albert van Dijk

  • Multi-decadal variability of drought risk, eastern Australia

    Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks

  • Drought and the future of rural communities: Opportunities and challenges for climate change adaptation in regional Victoria, Australia

    Anthony S. Kiem;Emma K. Austin

  • Climate variability over the last 35,000 years recorded in marine and terrestrial archives in the Australian region: an OZ-INTIMATE compilation

    Jessica M. Reeves;Timothy T. Barrows;Timothy J. Cohen;Anthony S. Kiem

  • On the identification of ENSO-induced rainfall and runoff variability: a comparison of methods and indices

    Anthony S. Kiem;Stewart W. Franks

  • Interdecadal Pacific variability and eastern Australian megadroughts over the last millennium

    Tessa Vance;J. L. Roberts;J. L. Roberts;C. T. Plummer;A. S. Kiem

  • Drought-related stress among farmers: findings from the Australian Rural Mental Health Study

    Emma K Austin;Tonelle Handley;Anthony S Kiem;Jane L Rich

  • Drought and water policy in Australia: Challenges for the future illustrated by the issues associated with water trading and climate change adaptation in the Murray–Darling Basin

    Anthony S. Kiem

  • On the uncertainties associated with using gridded rainfall data as a proxy for observed

    C. R. Tozer;A. S. Kiem;D. C. Verdon-Kidd

  • Natural hazards in Australia: floods

    Fiona Johnson;Christopher J. White;Albert van Dijk;Marie Ekstrom

  • Causes of the Widespread 2019–2020 Australian Bushfire Season

    Proloy Deb;Hamid Moradkhani;Peyman Abbaszadeh;Anthony S. Kiem

  • Understanding hydroclimate processes in the Murray-Darling Basin for natural resources management

    Ailie Jane Eyre Gallant;A S Kiem;D C Verdon-Kidd;Roger Christopher Stone

  • The Southern Annular Mode: a comparison of indices

    M. Ho;A. S. Kiem;D. C. Verdon-Kidd

  • Local perceptions of and adaptation to climate variability and change: the case of shrimp farming communities in the coastal region of Bangladesh

    Masud Iqbal Md Shameem;Salim Momtaz;Anthony S. Kiem

  • Future hydroclimatology of the Mekong River basin simulated using the high-resolution Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) AGCM

    Anthony S. Kiem;Hiroshi Ishidaira;Hapuarachchige P. Hapuarachchi;Maichun C. Zhou

  • Towards understanding hydroclimatic change in Victoria, Australia – preliminary insights into the "Big Dry"

    A. S. Kiem;D. C. Verdon-Kidd

Frequent Co-Authors

George Kuczera
George Kuczera University of Newcastle Australia
Jason L. Roberts
Jason L. Roberts Australian Antarctic Division
Garry Willgoose
Garry Willgoose University of Newcastle Australia
Stewart W. Franks
Stewart W. Franks University of Tasmania
Hiroshi Ishidaira
Hiroshi Ishidaira University of Yamanashi
Mark A. J. Curran
Mark A. J. Curran University of Tasmania
Kuniyoshi Takeuchi
Kuniyoshi Takeuchi University of Yamanashi
Seth Westra
Seth Westra University of Adelaide
Jason P. Evans
Jason P. Evans University of New South Wales
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Students interested in expanding their knowledge might explore related fields such as sociology, which plays a crucial role in understanding human-environment interactions. Finding a best online sociology bachelor degree program can complement environmental studies by offering insights into social behavior and community dynamics.

For those aiming to advance into leadership or academic roles, pursuing higher education online has become more accessible. One can consider enrolling in online ed d programs without dissertation, which allow for professional growth without the traditional dissertation requirement, making advanced degrees more flexible.

Additionally, bridging programs like the eds to edd bridge program provide a streamlined pathway for educators and environmental professionals to elevate their qualifications and impact.

Social work also intersects with environmental concerns, and students interested in holistic community well-being may explore fully funded dsw programs online to integrate social justice and sustainability in their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony S. Kiem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles