World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Santiago C. González-Martínez

Santiago C. González-Martínez

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
11491
World Ranking
2223
National Ranking
90

Santiago C. González-Martínez publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago C. González-Martínez sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 190 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Santiago C. González-Martínez D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago C. González-Martínez sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Santiago C. González-Martínez is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their research primarily spans across Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these main fields, they have focused extensively on subfields such as Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, and Ecological Modeling.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics linked to genetic diversity and population structure, forest ecology and management, genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, species distribution and climate change, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, forest insect ecology and management, as well as forest management and policy.

González-Martínez has published numerous papers, including the following notable works:

  • The GenTree Dendroecological Collection, tree-ring and wood density data from seven tree species across Europe, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Evolutionary rate and genetic load in an emblematic Mediterranean tree following an ancient and prolonged population collapse, 2020, Molecular Ecology
  • The application gap: Genomics for biodiversity and ecosystem service management, 2023, Biological Conservation
  • Polygenic adaptation and negative selection across traits, years and environments in a long-lived plant species (Pinus pinaster Ait., Pinaceae), 2022, Molecular Ecology
  • Genetic basis of growth, spring phenology, and susceptibility to biotic stressors in maritime pine, 2021, Evolutionary Applications

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Evolutionary Applications
  • Tree Genetics & Genomes

Among their recurring collaborators are:

  • Giovanni G. Vendramin
  • Delphine Grivet
  • Ricardo Alía
  • Francesca Bagnoli
  • Stephen Cavers

Best Publications

  • Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations

    Florian J. Alberto;Florian J. Alberto;Florian J. Alberto;Sally N. Aitken;Ricardo Alía;Santiago C. González‐Martínez

  • The GenTree Dendroecological Collection: tree-ring and wood density data from seven tree species across Europe

    Elisabet Martínez-Sancho;Lenka Slámová;Sandro Morganti;Claudio Grefen

  • Patterns of Population Structure and Environmental Associations to Aridity Across the Range of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae)

    Andrew J. Eckert;Joost van Heerwaarden;Jill L. Wegrzyn;C. Dana Nelson

  • Association Genetics in Pinus taeda L. I. Wood Property Traits

    Santiago C. Gonzalez-Martinez;Santiago C. Gonzalez-Martinez;Nicholas C. Wheeler;Elhan Ersoz;C. Dana Nelson

  • Forest-tree population genomics and adaptive evolution.

    Santiago C. González‐Martínez;Konstantin V. Krutovsky;David B. Neale;David B. Neale

  • Back to nature: ecological genomics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae)

    Andrew J. Eckert;Andrew D. Bower;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Jill L. Wegrzyn

  • DNA sequence variation and selection of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms at candidate genes for drought-stress response in Pinus taeda L.

    Santiago C. González-Martínez;Elhan Ersoz;Garth R. Brown;Nicholas C. Wheeler

  • Contrasting Patterns of Selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. Drought Stress Candidate Genes as Revealed by Genetic Differentiation Analyses

    Emmanuelle Eveno;Carmen Collada;M. Angeles Guevara;Valérie Léger

  • GENETICALLY DEPAUPERATE BUT WIDESPREAD: THE CASE OF AN EMBLEMATIC MEDITERRANEAN PINE

    Giovanni G. Vendramin;Bruno Fady;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Feng Sheng Hu;Feng Sheng Hu

  • Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest ( Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain

    M Valbuena-Carabaña;S C González-Martínez;V L Sork;C Collada

  • Range-wide phylogeography and gene zones in Pinus pinaster Ait. revealed by chloroplast microsatellite markers

    Gabriele Bucci;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Grégoire Le Provost;Christophe Plomion

  • Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. II. Carbon isotope discrimination

    S C González-Martínez;D Huber;E Ersoz;J M Davis

  • Molecular Footprints of Local Adaptation in Two Mediterranean Conifers

    Delphine Grivet;Federico Sebastiani;Federico Sebastiani;Ricardo Alía;Ricardo Alía;Thomas Bataillon

  • Fine-Scale Genetic Structure and Gene Dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated Paternity Within and Among Sibships

    Olivier J. Hardy;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Bruno Colas;Hélène Fréville;Hélène Fréville

  • Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: Strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability

    Marta Dubreuil;Miquel Riba;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Giovanni G. Vendramin

  • Forests and global change: what can genetics contribute to the major forest management and policy challenges of the twenty-first century?

    Bruno Fady;Joan Cottrell;Lennart Ackzell;Ricardo Alía

  • Advances in ecological genomics in forest trees and applications to genetic resources conservation and breeding.

    Jason A. Holliday;Sally N. Aitken;Janice E. K. Cooke;Bruno Fady

  • Effective gene dispersal and female reproductive success in Mediterranean maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton).

    Santiago C. González-Martínez;Jaroslaw Burczyk;Ran Nathan;Nikos Nanos

  • Mediterranean Stone Pine: Botany and Horticulture

    Sven Mutke;Rafael Calama;Santiago C. González‐Martínez;Gregorio Montero

  • Molecular Proxies for Climate Maladaptation in a Long-Lived Tree (Pinus pinaster Aiton, Pinaceae)

    Juan-Pablo Jaramillo-Correa;Isabel Rodríguez-Quilón;Delphine Grivet;Camille Lepoittevin;Camille Lepoittevin

  • Geography determines genetic relationships between species of mountain pine (Pinus mugo complex) in western Europe.

    Myriam Heuertz;Myriam Heuertz;Jennifer Teufel;Santiago C. González-Martínez;Alvaro Soto;Alvaro Soto

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni G. Vendramin
Giovanni G. Vendramin National Research Council (CNR)
Ricardo Alía
Ricardo Alía Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
Myriam Heuertz
Myriam Heuertz University of Bordeaux
Christophe Plomion
Christophe Plomion University of Bordeaux
Bruno Fady
Bruno Fady INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Luis Gil
Luis Gil Technical University of Madrid
David B. Neale
David B. Neale University of California, Davis
Christian Lexer
Christian Lexer University of Vienna
Miguel Verdú
Miguel Verdú University of Valencia
Outi Savolainen
Outi Savolainen University of Oulu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to a diverse range of career paths, from research and conservation roles to opportunities in public health and education. For those considering further studies, online degree programs provide flexible pathways to build expertise and open doors to emerging fields.

Many students interested in science continue their education through healthcare-related degrees, as these areas often intersect in environmental health and policy. For example, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online allow graduates from non-nursing backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles.

If you’re looking for the best value nursing education online wgu, comparison guides can help you find programs that balance affordability and quality. Those who already hold a BSN might consider the cheapest bsn to msn online to expand career options efficiently.

When choosing an online degree, always consider accreditation and reputation. Opt for non profit universities to ensure your program meets industry standards and is recognized by employers. Online study offers flexible and sustainable ways to advance your science career.

Best Scientists Citing Santiago C. González-Martínez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles