World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
21655
World Ranking
16263
National Ranking
8175

Mitchell S. Anscher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell S. Anscher sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 408 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mitchell S. Anscher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell S. Anscher sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mitchell S. Anscher is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several interconnected subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work centers on topics related to prostate cancer, with significant contributions to Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research as well as Diagnosis and Treatment of prostate cancer. Additional areas of focus include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques, Radiation Dose and Imaging, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, and the use of MRI in cancer diagnosis.

Mitchell S. Anscher has published multiple papers, and some of the recent notable publications include:

  • FDA Approval Summary: Rucaparib for the Treatment of Patients with Deleterious BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, 2020, The Oncologist
  • Therapy-Induced Senescence: Opportunities to Improve Anticancer Therapy, 2021, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Association of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Factors With Receipt of Nondefinitive Therapy Among Younger Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Definitive Treatment of Early Stage Kidney Cancer: A Survival Comparison With Surgery, Tumor Ablation, and Observation, 2020, Advances in Radiation Oncology
  • Hypofractionated Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer to Reduce Toxicity and Improve Patient Convenience: A Phase 1/2 Trial, 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Chad Tang
  • Steven J. Frank
  • Brian F. Chapin
  • Chana Weinstock
  • Richard Pazdur

Their publications are frequently found in a variety of scientific journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Oncologist
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Mitchell S. Anscher's research explores technical aspects of radiation therapy and cancer treatment modalities, with a concentration on improving treatment strategies and understanding the biological impacts of therapy. Their work bridges clinical applications and molecular approaches, informing both clinical practice and cancer research.

Best Publications

  • Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms.

    Helen B. Stone;C. Norman Coleman;Mitchell Steven Anscher;William H. McBride

  • Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Peter T. Scardino;Michael W. Kattan;Thomas M. Pisansky

  • Hepatic toxicity resulting from cancer treatment

    Theodore S. Lawrence;John M. Robertson;Mitchell Steven Anscher;Randy L. Jirtle

  • Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity: a dose-volume histogram analysis in 201 patients with lung cancer

    Maria L. Hernando;Lawrence B. Marks;Gunilla C. Bentel;Su Min Zhou

  • The response of the urinary bladder, urethra, and ureter to radiation and chemotherapy

    Lawrence B. Marks;Peter R. Carroll;Thomas C. Dugan;Mitchell S. Anscher

  • Transforming Growth Factor β as a Predictor of Liver and Lung Fibrosis after Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Advanced Breast Cancer

    Mitchell S. Anscher;William P. Peters;Herbert Reisenbichler;William P. Petros

  • Preoperative Radiation and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum

    Ravi S. Chari;Douglas S. Tyler;Mitchell Steven Anscher;Linda Russell

  • Contemporary Update of a Multi-Institutional Predictive Nomogram for Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy

    Rahul D. Tendulkar;Shree Agrawal;Tianming Gao;Jason A. Efstathiou

  • Radiation-induced lung injury.

    Lawrence B Marks;Xiaoli Yu;Zjelko Vujaskovic;William Small

  • Radiation Pulmonary Toxicity: From Mechanisms to Management

    Paul R. Graves;Farzan Siddiqui;Mitchell S. Anscher;Benjamin Movsas

  • Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.

    M S Anscher;P Jones;L R Prosnitz;W Blackstock

  • Plasma transforming growth factor β1 as a predictor of radiation pneumonitis

    Mitchell S. Anscher;Feng Ming Kong;Katrina Andrews;Robert Clough

  • Models for Evaluating Agents Intended for the Prophylaxis, Mitigation and Treatment of Radiation Injuries Report of an NCI Workshop, December 3–4, 2003

    Helen B. Stone;John E. Moulder;C. Norman Coleman;K. Kian Ang

  • Physical and biological predictors of changes in whole-lung function following thoracic irradiation

    Lawrence B. Marks;Michael T. Munley;Gunilla C. Bentel;Su Min Zhou

  • Radiation-induced hypoxia may perpetuate late normal tissue injury

    Zeljko Vujaskovic;Mitchell S. Anscher;Qin Fu Feng;Zahid N. Rabbani

  • Elevated plasma transforming growth factor-β1 levels in breast cancer patients decrease after surgical removal of the tumor

    Feng-Ming Kong;Mitchell Anscher;Tadashi Murase;Barbara Abbott

  • Radiotherapy for a rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: the first 10 years.

    Mitchell S Anscher;Robert Clough;Richard Dodge

  • Predicting the risk of symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury using both the physical and biologic parameters V30 and transforming growth factor β

    Xiao Long Fu;Hong Huang;Gunilla Bentel;Robert Clough

  • Clinical and dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity.

    Patrick D. Maguire;Gregory S. Sibley;Su Min Zhou;Timothy A. Jamieson

  • A small molecular weight catalytic metalloporphyrin antioxidant with superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic properties protects lungs from radiation-induced injury.

    Zeljko Vujaskovic;Ines Batinic-Haberle;Zahid N. Rabbani;Qin fu Feng

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence B. Marks
Lawrence B. Marks University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark W. Dewhirst
Mark W. Dewhirst Duke University
James E. Herndon
James E. Herndon Duke University
Alan Pollack
Alan Pollack University of Miami
Ines Batinic-Haberle
Ines Batinic-Haberle Duke University
R. Edward Coleman
R. Edward Coleman Duke University
Richard K. Dodge
Richard K. Dodge Duke University
Michael W. Kattan
Michael W. Kattan Cleveland Clinic
Herbert Hurwitz
Herbert Hurwitz Duke University
Jeffrey Crawford
Jeffrey Crawford Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following a traditional MD path. Many students explore alternative and online programs that offer flexibility, quicker completion, and entry into high-demand healthcare fields. For those eyeing advanced nursing careers, easiest dnp programs provide a path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, often with formats designed for working professionals.

Newcomers to healthcare may benefit from the accelerated lpn program options online. These programs prepare students for practical nursing careers quickly, helping fill critical workforce gaps. Additionally, those interested in mental health can consider online psych np programs, which equip nurses for advanced psychiatric and mental health practice roles.

Not all healthcare careers are in clinical practice. Management and administrative roles are essential too. The healthcare administration degree online is perfect for those interested in leadership, policy, or hospital operations. These degrees prepare graduates to manage hospitals, clinics, and other care facilities in a rapidly evolving industry.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell S. Anscher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles