World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
R. Edward Coleman

R. Edward Coleman

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
45850
World Ranking
4383
National Ranking
2395

R. Edward Coleman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Edward Coleman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 534 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

R. Edward Coleman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Edward Coleman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Edward Coleman was affiliated with Duke University in the United States during their academic career. The scientist passed away, and the professional record reflects their past contributions to the academic community.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or frequent publication venues are recorded in the available data for R. Edward Coleman. Similarly, there is no information on any book publications linked to the scientist.

The data does not list any main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of work. Likewise, there are no awards or formal recognitions documented for R. Edward Coleman.

Given this, the profile focuses on the historical affiliation, with no further publicly recorded contributions in research output, collaboration patterns, or professional distinctions documented at this time.

Best Publications

  • A Tabulated Summary of the FDG PET Literature

    Sanjiv S. Gambhir;Johannes Czernin;Judy Schwimmer;Daniel H. S. Silverman

  • Use of Florbetapir-PET for Imaging β-Amyloid Pathology

    Christopher M. Clark;Julie A. Schneider;Barry J. Bedell;Thomas G. Beach

  • Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology

    James W. Fletcher;James W. Fletcher;Benjamin Djulbegovic;Heloisa P. Soares;Barry A. Siegel

  • Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology

    Eric M. Rohren;Timothy G. Turkington;R. Edward Coleman

  • Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study

    Christopher M Clark;Michael J Pontecorvo;Thomas G Beach;Barry J Bedell

  • Procedure Guideline for Tumor Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0

    Dominique Delbeke;R. Edward Coleman;Milton J. Guiberteau;Manuel L. Brown

  • Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy: a reversible form of left ventricular dysfunction.

    Douglas L. Packer;Gust H. Bardy;Seth J. Worley;Mark S. Smith

  • Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning.

    E F Patz;V J Lowe;J M Hoffman;S S Paine

  • Cardiovascular and Behavioral Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training in Healthy Older Men and Women

    James A. Blumenthal;Charles F. Emery;David J. Madden;Linda K. George

  • Indium-111 labeled platelets: Studies on preparation and evaluation of in vitro and in vivo functions

    Mathew L. Thakur;Michael J. Welch;J. Heinrich Joist;R. Edward Coleman

  • Effects of Exercise and Stress Management Training on Markers of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease A Randomized Controlled Trial

    James A. Blumenthal;Andrew Sherwood;Michael A. Babyak;Lana L. Watkins

  • Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.

    Timothy R. DeGrado;R. Edward Coleman;Shuyan Wang;Steven W. Baldwin

  • Neuroimaging and early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease : a look to the future

    Jeffrey R. Petrella;R. Edward Coleman;P. Murali Doraiswamy

  • Mental stress--induced myocardial ischemia and cardiac events.

    Wei Jiang;Michael Babyak;David S. Krantz;Robert A. Waugh

  • Staging non-small cell lung cancer with whole-body PET

    Marom Em;McAdams Hp;Erasmus Jj;Goodman Pc

  • Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Alone on Expected Management of Patients With Cancer: Initial Results From the National Oncologic PET Registry

    Bruce E. Hillner;Barry A. Siegel;Dawei Liu;Anthony F. Shields

  • The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

    Vinita Ahuja;R. Edward Coleman;James Herndon;Edward F. Patz

  • Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

    J J Erasmus;E F Patz;H P McAdams;J G Murray

  • Clinical Experience with α-Particle–Emitting 211At: Treatment of Recurrent Brain Tumor Patients with 211At-Labeled Chimeric Antitenascin Monoclonal Antibody 81C6

    Michael R. Zalutsky;David A. Reardon;Gamal Akabani;R. Edward Coleman

  • Recommendations on the Use of 18 F-FDG PET in Oncology

    James W. Fletcher;Benjamin Djulbegovic;Heloisa P. Soares;Barry A. Siegel

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Provenzale
James M. Provenzale Duke University
Barry A. Siegel
Barry A. Siegel Washington University in St. Louis
Michael R. Zalutsky
Michael R. Zalutsky Duke University
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Lawrence B. Marks
Lawrence B. Marks University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Darell D. Bigner
Darell D. Bigner Duke University
James E. Herndon
James E. Herndon Duke University
Allan H. Friedman
Allan H. Friedman Duke University
Henry S. Friedman
Henry S. Friedman Duke University
Mark A. Mintun
Mark A. Mintun University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens many more doors beyond traditional medical degrees. Today, online education offers accessible alternatives that can lead to rewarding healthcare roles. One popular choice is a health care administration degree online, which prepares graduates for leadership positions in hospitals and clinics.

For those seeking advanced training, pursuing the cheapest online mha programs can be an effective way to deepen your expertise in healthcare systems and management. Additionally, nursing professionals may consider enrolling in one of the cheapest dnp programs, leading to clinical or academic leadership roles.

Aspiring pharmacists are now able to earn credentials flexibly through an online pharmacist degree. These online pathways make it easier for both new students and working professionals to expand their horizons, enhance qualifications, and enjoy a wide array of career options in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing R. Edward Coleman

Recently Published Articles