What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Radiology
His primary areas of investigation include Nuclear medicine, Positron emission tomography, Internal medicine, Radiology and Pathology.
His Nuclear medicine research includes elements of Carcinoma, Florbetaben and Autopsy.
His Positron emission tomography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Alzheimer's disease, Cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging and Stage.
His studies in Internal medicine integrate themes in fields like Oncology and Cardiology.
His research integrates issues of Respiratory disease, Lung cancer, Malignancy and Prospective cohort study in his study of Radiology.
His work in the fields of Pathology, such as Biopsy, intersects with other areas such as Human herpesvirus 6.
His most cited work include:
- A Tabulated Summary of the FDG PET Literature (804 citations)
- Use of Florbetapir-PET for Imaging β-Amyloid Pathology (789 citations)
- Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology (756 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Nuclear medicine, Internal medicine, Radiology, Positron emission tomography and Cardiology are his primary areas of study.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Tomography, Radiation therapy and Perfusion.
His work in Internal medicine tackles topics such as Pathology which are related to areas like Glioma.
His work carried out in the field of Radiology brings together such families of science as Cancer, Respiratory disease, Lung, Prospective cohort study and Lung cancer.
His work in Positron emission tomography addresses issues such as Alzheimer's disease, which are connected to fields such as Dementia.
His Ejection fraction study combines topics in areas such as Chest pain and Heart rate.
He most often published in these fields:
- Nuclear medicine (32.17%)
- Internal medicine (34.78%)
- Radiology (22.90%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2019)?
- Nuclear medicine (32.17%)
- Positron emission tomography (22.61%)
- Radiology (22.90%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Nuclear medicine, Positron emission tomography, Radiology, Internal medicine and Pathology.
His Bone scintigraphy study in the realm of Nuclear medicine connects with subjects such as In patient.
The Positron emission tomography study combines topics in areas such as Alzheimer's disease, Magnetic resonance imaging, Medical physics and Cervical cancer.
His work deals with themes such as Cancer, Breast cancer, Thyroid cancer, Prospective cohort study and Lung cancer, which intersect with Radiology.
His Internal medicine research incorporates elements of Endocrinology, Oncology and Cardiology.
Radioimmunotherapy and Central nervous system disease is closely connected to Glioma in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Pathology.
Between 2005 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Use of Florbetapir-PET for Imaging β-Amyloid Pathology (789 citations)
- Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology (756 citations)
- Procedure Guideline for Tumor Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0 (504 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Radiology
R. Edward Coleman mostly deals with Nuclear medicine, Radiology, Internal medicine, Positron emission tomography and Cancer.
His Nuclear medicine research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Florbetaben, Ct imaging, Tomography, Prostate cancer and Autopsy.
R. Edward Coleman combines subjects such as Guideline, Prospective cohort study and Confidence interval with his study of Radiology.
His Internal medicine research incorporates themes from Cardiology, Airway obstruction, Oncology and Pathology.
His Positron emission tomography research includes themes of Alzheimer's disease, Tumor imaging and Neoplasms diagnosis.
His Cancer study incorporates themes from Lung cancer and PET-CT.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
