World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ronald Boellaard

Ronald Boellaard

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
44932
World Ranking
8473
National Ranking
332

Ronald Boellaard publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Boellaard sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 889 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronald Boellaard D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Boellaard sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald Boellaard is affiliated with Amsterdam UMC in the Netherlands and has an extensive body of research primarily within the field of medicine, with a particular focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Their work spans multiple subfields, including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, pathology and forensic medicine, and neurology.

Their research topics are diverse and encompass various aspects of medical imaging and its applications. Key thematic areas include medical imaging techniques and applications, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, radiopharmaceutical chemistry, advanced X-ray and CT imaging, advanced MRI techniques, and dementia and cognitive impairment research.

Boellaard has contributed to numerous scholarly articles published in several specialized journals. Some of their recent significant papers include:

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping (2020) in Radiology
  • A Guide to ComBat Harmonization of Imaging Biomarkers in Multicenter Studies (2021) in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • EANM procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [18F]FDG, version 3 (2021) in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • EANM practice guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for dopaminergic imaging in Parkinsonian syndromes 1.0 (2020) in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Convolutional Filters for Reproducible Radiomics and Enhanced Clinical Insights (2024) in Radiology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Boellaard on multiple occasions include Gerben J.C. Zwezerijnen, Josée M. Zijlstra, Sandeep S.V. Golla, Maqsood Yaqub, and Otto S. Hoekstra.

Boellaard's publications frequently appear in journals such as the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Alzheimer's & Dementia, EJNMMI Research, and EJNMMI Physics, reflecting a strong emphasis on nuclear medicine and neurodegenerative disease research.

Best Publications

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping

    Alex Zwanenburg;Alex Zwanenburg;Martin Vallières;Mahmoud A. Abdalah;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts

  • FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

    Ronald Boellaard;Roberto Delgado-Bolton;Wim J. G. Oyen;Francesco Giammarile

  • FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0

    Ronald Boellaard;Mike J. O'Doherty;Wolfgang A. Weber;Felix M. Mottaghy

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis

    Ronald Boellaard

  • Effects of Noise, Image Resolution, and ROI Definition on the Accuracy of Standard Uptake Values: A Simulation Study

    Ronald Boellaard;Nanda C. Krak;Otto S. Hoekstra;Adriaan A. Lammertsma

  • Microglia activation in recent-onset schizophrenia: a quantitative (R)-[11C]PK11195 positron emission tomography study

    Bart N. van Berckel;Matthijs G. Bossong;Ronald Boellaard;Reina Kloet

  • 89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer

    Frederike Bensch;Elly L. van der Veen;Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge;Annelies Jorritsma-Smit

  • Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0.

    Ian Law;Nathalie L. Albert;Javier Arbizu;Ronald Boellaard;Ronald Boellaard

  • Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol induces dopamine release in the human striatum.

    Matthijs G Bossong;Bart N M van Berckel;Bart N M van Berckel;Ronald Boellaard;Lineke Zuurman

  • 89Zr Immuno-PET: Comprehensive Procedures for the Production of 89Zr-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies

    Iris Verel;Gerard W M Visser;Ronald Boellaard;Marijke Stigter Van Walsum

  • Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

    A. N. Niemeijer;D. Leung;M. C. Huisman;I. Bahce

  • The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials

    Ronald Boellaard;Wim J. G. Oyen;Corneline J. Hoekstra;Otto S. Hoekstra

  • Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability

    Ralph T. H. Leijenaar;Sara Carvalho;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Wouter J. C. van Elmpt

  • The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.

    Ralph T.H. Leijenaar;Georgi Nalbantov;Sara Carvalho;Wouter J.C. van Elmpt

  • Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner

    Hugo W A M de Jong;Floris H P van Velden;Reina W Kloet;Fred L Buijs

  • Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System

    Joyce J van Sluis;Johan R. de Jong;Jenny Schaar;Walter Noordzij

  • Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial

    Nanda C. Krak;R. Boellaard;Otto S. Hoekstra;Jos W. R. Twisk

  • Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters

    Marinke Westerterp;Jan Pruim;Wim Oyen;Otto Hoekstra

  • Repeatability of Radiomic Features in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Studies: Impact of Reconstruction and Delineation.

    Floris H. P. van Velden;Floris H. P. van Velden;Gerbrand M. Kramer;Virginie Frings;Ida A. Nissen

Frequent Co-Authors

Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Adriaan A. Lammertsma VU University Medical Center
Otto S. Hoekstra
Otto S. Hoekstra Amsterdam UMC
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Rik Ossenkoppele
Rik Ossenkoppele Lund University
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Wiesje M. van der Flier
Wiesje M. van der Flier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Egbert F. Smit
Egbert F. Smit VU University Medical Center
Rudi Dierckx
Rudi Dierckx University Medical Center Groningen
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those exploring careers related to medicine in the USA, online degree programs offer flexibility and a wide range of pathways. Healthcare is evolving rapidly, and earning an advanced credential can open doors to diverse roles in the industry.

Nutrition is a crucial component of health care, and enrolling in online nutrition degree programs can lead to opportunities in wellness, public health, or clinical settings. If you are interested in hospital or healthcare leadership, consider online mha programs cahme accredited, which are recognized for quality and industry relevance.

Registered nurses can advance their careers with rn to bsn online no clinicals programs, allowing them to earn a bachelor’s degree without additional on-site clinical requirements. For those pursuing the highest level of nursing practice, accelerated dnp programs provide a streamlined path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Each of these online education options can help you build specialized skills, meet changing workforce demands, and prepare for a rewarding career supporting healthier communities.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald Boellaard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles