World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 131 2358 2195 89 88 1196 82086

Philippe Lambin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philippe Lambin between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philippe Lambin published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 36 papers a year. Output peaked at 91 publications in 2016. 33 of the 1,474 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 91. Peak 91 publications in 2016. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 44 publications 2006: 46 publications 2007: 62 publications 2008: 39 publications 2009: 75 publications 2010: 63 publications 2011: 49 publications 2012: 69 publications 2013: 76 publications 2014: 80 publications 2015: 81 publications 2016: 91 publications 2017: 91 publications 2018: 65 publications 2019: 51 publications 2020: 62 publications 2021: 87 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 87 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 10 publications
1985 2025

1,474 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philippe Lambin: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 5
1989 1
1990 2
1991 9
1992 7
1993 13
1994 9
1995 4
1996 18
1997 9
1998 10
1999 10
2000 8
2001 21
2002 15
2003 16
2004 30
2005 44
2006 46
2007 62
2008 39
2009 75
2010 63
2011 49
2012 69
2013 76
2014 80
2015 81
2016 91
2017 91
2018 65
2019 51
2020 62
2021 87
2022 32
2023 87
2024 23
2025 10
Total 1,474
Download as CSV

Philippe Lambin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Lambin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,181–1,200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,196 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39 1,196
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philippe Lambin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Lambin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 130–131 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179 131
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philippe Lambin is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a notable focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, and Oncology.

The scientist's work concentrates heavily on topics related to Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, covering a significant number of publications in this area. Other primary research topics include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, AI in cancer detection, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism.

Philippe Lambin's recent papers illustrate the diversity and focus of their research interests. Notable publications include:

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping, 2020, Radiology
  • Transparency of deep neural networks for medical image analysis: A review of interpretability methods, 2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine
  • Radiomics: from qualitative to quantitative imaging, 2020, British Journal of Radiology
  • A review in radiomics: Making personalized medicine a reality via routine imaging, 2021, Medicinal Research Reviews
  • Development of a clinical decision support system for severity risk prediction and triage of COVID-19 patients at hospital admission: an international multicentre study, 2020, European Respiratory Journal

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Henry C. Woodruff
  • Ludwig J. Dubois
  • Ralph T. H. Leijenaar
  • Sergey Primakov
  • Abdalla Ibrahim

Lambin's research has been published in several key venues, often contributing multiple works to these outlets. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Radiotherapy and Oncology
  • Cancers
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

    Philippe Lambin;Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez;Ralph Leijenaar;Sara Carvalho

  • Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach

    Hugo J W L Aerts;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Ralph T H Leijenaar;Chintan Parmar

  • Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine

    Philippe Lambin;Ralph T H Leijenaar;Timo M Deist;Jurgen Peerlings

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping

    Alex Zwanenburg;Alex Zwanenburg;Martin Vallières;Mahmoud A. Abdalah;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers

    Chintan Parmar;Chintan Parmar;Patrick Grossmann;Johan Bussink;Philippe Lambin

  • The unfolded protein response protects human tumor cells during hypoxia through regulation of the autophagy genes MAP1LC3B and ATG5

    Kasper M.A. Rouschop;Twan van den Beucken;Ludwig Dubois;Hanneke Niessen

  • Low-dose hypersensitivity : Current status and possible mechanisms

    Michael C Joiner;Brian Marples;Philippe Lambin;Susan C Short

  • CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

    Thibaud Patrick Coroller;Thibaud Patrick Coroller;Patrick Grossmann;Patrick Grossmann;Ying Hou;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez

  • Robust Radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation.

    Chintan Parmar;Chintan Parmar;Chintan Parmar;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Ralph Leijenaar;Mohammed Jermoumi;Mohammed Jermoumi

  • A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry.

    Wouter van Elmpt;Leah McDermott;Sebastiaan Nijsten;Markus Wendling

  • Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer

    Paul C. Boutros;Paul C. Boutros;Michael Fraser;Nicholas J. Harding;Richard De Borja

  • Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: the model-based approach.

    Johannes A. Langendijk;Philippe Lambin;Dirk De Ruysscher;Joachim Widder

  • Nomograms for Predicting Local Recurrence, Distant Metastases, and Overall Survival for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer on the Basis of European Randomized Clinical Trials

    Vincenzo Valentini;Ruud G.P.M. Van Stiphout;Guido Lammering;Maria Antonietta Gambacorta

  • Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer

    Chintan Parmar;Chintan Parmar;Ralph T. H. Leijenaar;Patrick Grossmann;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez

  • Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability

    Ralph T. H. Leijenaar;Sara Carvalho;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Wouter J. C. van Elmpt

  • The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.

    Ralph T.H. Leijenaar;Georgi Nalbantov;Sara Carvalho;Wouter J.C. van Elmpt

  • Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems

    Philippe Lambin;Ruud G. P. M. van Stiphout;Maud H. W. Starmans;Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez

  • Time Between the First Day of Chemotherapy and the Last Day of Chest Radiation Is the Most Important Predictor of Survival in Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Dirk De Ruysscher;Madelon Pijls-Johannesma;Søren M. Bentzen;André Minken

  • Corrigendum: Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach

    Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Ralph T.H. Leijenaar;Chintan Parmar

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk De Ruysscher
Dirk De Ruysscher Maastricht University
Hugo J.W.L. Aerts
Hugo J.W.L. Aerts Brigham and Women's Hospital
Bradly G. Wouters
Bradly G. Wouters Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Anne-Marie C. Dingemans
Anne-Marie C. Dingemans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul C. Boutros
Paul C. Boutros University of California, Los Angeles
Felix M. Mottaghy
Felix M. Mottaghy RWTH Aachen University
László P. Biró
László P. Biró Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science
Johan Bussink
Johan Bussink Radboud University
Jozef Anné
Jozef Anné KU Leuven
Claudiu T. Supuran
Claudiu T. Supuran University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but want flexible learning or alternative healthcare roles, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways to explore. These programs offer accessible options for getting started in the healthcare field or advancing your current expertise.

One growing area is healthcare informatics, which blends IT skills with medical knowledge. Accredited healthcare informatics degree programs offer affordable, remote study options for students interested in managing health data and technology systems in clinical settings.

For those interested in administrative roles, medical billing and coding online courses provide a practical pathway into the medical field, opening job opportunities in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

Nursing remains a highly demanded profession with several online pathways. Those aiming for advanced practice roles can look into the cheapest np programs online to become nurse practitioners. Meanwhile, those starting their nursing journey can compare options to discover what is the cheapest online college for nursing? and begin a rewarding career with greater financial flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Lambin

Trending Scientists