World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
128
Citations
89829
World Ranking
2650
National Ranking
1482

Robert J. Gillies publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Gillies sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 606 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert J. Gillies D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Gillies sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Gillies was affiliated with the Moffitt Cancer Center in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields related to medicine, with a primary focus on radiology, oncology, and molecular biology. Over the course of their career, they contributed extensively to the study and application of radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, cancer biology, and diagnostic techniques.

The main fields of study for Robert J. Gillies included Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. More specifically, their subfields of study incorporated Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Oncology.

Their research topics demonstrated a strong emphasis on:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis
  • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
  • Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth

Robert J. Gillies published numerous papers during their career, with significant contributions to the understanding of radiomic features and their clinical applications. Notable papers include:

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping, 2020, Radiology
  • The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features, 2021, Radiology
  • The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features, 2021, Radiology
  • Non-invasive decision support for NSCLC treatment using PET/CT radiomics, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Non-invasive measurement of PD-L1 status and prediction of immunotherapy response using deep learning of PET/CT images, 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Their frequent co-authors included:

  • Matthew B. Schabath
  • Robert A. Gatenby
  • Michal R. Tomaszewski
  • Wei Mu
  • Ilke Tunali

Robert J. Gillies published extensively in several key venues, indicating their active engagement with leading journals and platforms in their discipline. These venues included:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Tomography
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Radiology

Best Publications

  • Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

    Robert J. Gillies;Paul E. Kinahan;Hedvig Hricak

  • Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis

    Robert A. Gatenby;Robert J. Gillies

  • Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

    Philippe Lambin;Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez;Ralph Leijenaar;Sara Carvalho

  • Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach

    Hugo J W L Aerts;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Ralph T H Leijenaar;Chintan Parmar

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping

    Alex Zwanenburg;Alex Zwanenburg;Martin Vallières;Mahmoud A. Abdalah;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts

  • Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.

    Wenya Linda Bi;Ahmed Hosny;Matthew B. Schabath;Maryellen L. Giger

  • Acidity generated by the tumor microenvironment drives local invasion

    Veronica Estrella;Tingan Chen;Mark Lloyd;Jonathan Wojtkowiak

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Acid-Mediated Tumor Invasion: a Multidisciplinary Study

    Robert A. Gatenby;Edward T. Gawlinski;Arthur F. Gmitro;Brant Kaylor

  • A microenvironmental model of carcinogenesis

    Robert A. Gatenby;Robert J. Gillies

  • Determination of cell number in monolayer cultures

    R.J. Gillies;N. Didier;M. Denton

  • Causes and Consequences of Increased Glucose Metabolism of Cancers

    Robert J. Gillies;Ian Robey;Robert A. Gatenby

  • Bicarbonate increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastases

    Ian F. Robey;Brenda K. Baggett;Nathaniel D. Kirkpatrick;Denise J. Roe

  • Evolutionary dynamics of carcinogenesis and why targeted therapy does not work.

    Robert J. Gillies;Daniel Verduzco;Robert A. Gatenby

  • MRI of the tumor microenvironment.

    Robert J. Gillies;Natarajan Raghunand;Gregory S. Karczmar;Zaver M. Bhujwalla

  • Tumor pH and its measurement

    Xiaomeng Zhang;Yuxiang Lin;Robert J. Gillies

  • Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features: A Systematic Review.

    Alberto Traverso;Leonard Wee;Andre Dekker;Robert Gillies

  • Acidic pH enhances the invasive behavior of human melanoma cells.

    Raul Martínez-Zaguilán;Elisabeth A. Seftor;Richard E B Seftor;Yi Wen Chu

  • pH sensing and regulation in cancer.

    Mehdi Damaghi;Jonathan W. Wojtkowiak;Robert J. Gillies

  • Corrigendum: Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach

    Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Emmanuel Rios Velazquez;Ralph T.H. Leijenaar;Chintan Parmar

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Gatenby
Robert A. Gatenby Moffitt Cancer Center
Dmitry B. Goldgof
Dmitry B. Goldgof University of South Florida
Lawrence O. Hall
Lawrence O. Hall University of South Florida
Victor J. Hruby
Victor J. Hruby University of Arizona
Hugo J.W.L. Aerts
Hugo J.W.L. Aerts Brigham and Women's Hospital
Alexander R. A. Anderson
Alexander R. A. Anderson Moffitt Cancer Center
Philippe Lambin
Philippe Lambin Maastricht University
Joel S. Brown
Joel S. Brown University of Illinois at Chicago
Sandy Napel
Sandy Napel Stanford University
Philip K. Maini
Philip K. Maini University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in Medicine or related fields, there are flexible online degree options to help you advance your education and skills. For nurses looking to attain the highest clinical degree, exploring the best online bsn to dnp programs can help you build advanced leadership and practice expertise.

Aspiring pharmacists can benefit from searching for the cheapest online pharmacy school. These programs provide a flexible, cost-effective way to earn a doctoral degree in pharmacy, opening the door to a variety of healthcare roles.

For those interested in the vital role of managing patient data and health records, a health information management bachelor degree online offers robust training while fitting busy schedules.

Additionally, those seeking quick entry into healthcare administration can consider medical billing and coding online programs to start their journey in a high-demand specialty. These online pathways support diverse career goals while making education more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Gillies

Recently Published Articles