World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charlene L. Muehlenhard

Charlene L. Muehlenhard

Charlene L. Muehlenhard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlene L. Muehlenhard sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charlene L. Muehlenhard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlene L. Muehlenhard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Charlene L. Muehlenhard is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research work primarily focuses on the social sciences, with particular emphasis on gender studies and sexual assault and victimization studies.

Their scholarly output includes publications in peer-reviewed journals, with recent work published in "Psychology of Violence." Notably, their 2024 publication is titled A broader view of sexual consent: Prerequisites that make consent more meaningful.

The following list summarizes key aspects of their research profile:

  • Recent papers: A broader view of sexual consent: Prerequisites that make consent more meaningful (2024, Psychology of Violence)

  • Frequent publication venues: Psychology of Violence

  • Main fields of study: Social Sciences

  • Subfields of study: Gender Studies

  • Main topics of work: Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Muehlenhard's collaborative network does not list frequent co-authors, indicating a possible focus on independent research or diverse collaborative partnerships.

Their career achievements include being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors.

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Melaney A. Linton

  • Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex.

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Lisa C. Hollabaugh

  • The Complexities of Sexual Consent Among College Students: A Conceptual and Empirical Review

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Terry P. Humphreys;Kristen N. Jozkowski;Zoë D. Peterson

  • “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations

    Susan E. Hickman;Charlene L. Muehlenhard

  • Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity.

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Stephen W. Cook

  • Was It Rape? The Function of Women's Rape Myth Acceptance and Definitions of Sex in Labeling Their Own Experiences

    Zoë D. Peterson;Charlene L. Muehlenhard

  • Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women???s Risk of Sexual Assault While in College

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Zoë D. Peterson;Terry P. Humphreys;Kristen N. Jozkowski

  • Is Date Rape Justifiable?: The Effects of Dating Activity, Who Initiated, Who Paid, and Men's Attitudes toward Women

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Debra E. Friedman;Celeste M. Thomas

  • The Social Construction of Violence: The Case of Sexual and Domestic Violence

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Leigh Ann Kimes

  • Definitions of Rape: Scientific and Political Implications

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Irene G. Powch;Joi L. Phelps;Laura M. Giusti

  • Misinterpreted dating behaviors and the risk of date rape

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard

  • Double Standard/Double Bind: The Sexual Double Standard and Women's Communication about Sex

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Marcia L. McCoy

  • Conceptualizing the "wantedness" of women's consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: implications for how women label their experiences with rape.

    Zoe D. Peterson;Charlene L. Muehlenhard

  • Distinguishing Between Sex and Gender: History, Current Conceptualizations, and Implications

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Zoe D. Peterson

  • COLLEGE WOMEN'S FEARS AND PRECAUTIONARY BEHAVIORS RELATING TO ACQUAINTANCE RAPE AND STRANGER RAPE

    Susan E. Hickman;Charlene L. Muehlenhard

  • Token Resistance to Sex: New Perspectives on an Old Stereotype

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Carie S. Rodgers

  • Men's and Women's Reports of Pretending Orgasm

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Sheena K. Shippee

  • III. Wanting and Not Wanting Sex: The Missing Discourse of Ambivalence

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Zoë D. Peterson

  • Women's Beliefs About Women Who “Lead Men on”

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Jennifer S. MacNaughton

  • Men's heterosocial skill and attitudes toward women as predictors of verbal sexual coercion and forceful rape

    Charlene L. Muehlenhard;Polly L. Falcon

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. McFall
Richard M. McFall Indiana University
Christian Grov
Christian Grov City University of New York
Geoff MacDonald
Geoff MacDonald University of Toronto
H. Jonathon Rendina
H. Jonathon Rendina City University of New York
Ana Ventuneac
Ana Ventuneac Start Treatment & Recovery Centers
Jeffrey T. Parsons
Jeffrey T. Parsons City University of New York
Jessica M. Sales
Jessica M. Sales Emory University
Jerome L. Singer
Jerome L. Singer Yale University
Amy Muise
Amy Muise York University
Clyde Hendrick
Clyde Hendrick Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology offers an array of opportunities, especially with the rise of flexible online learning. Many students are now considering affordable online counseling master's degrees in the US to advance their education while balancing personal and professional commitments.

Accessibility and cost are key considerations. For those in the western region, there are cheapest online counseling master's degrees in the West, offering regional flexibility and budget-friendly options. Likewise, students based in Michigan can explore affordable online counseling degrees in Michigan tailored to state-specific licensure requirements.

In New York, many programs focus on both accreditation standards and reasonable tuition, as highlighted by the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in New York. By researching these options, students can chart clear career pathways, from clinical practice to academic research, and meet the evolving needs of the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Charlene L. Muehlenhard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles